View Full Version : Convertion mm vs X factor
jose
Saturday 20th December 2003, 20:25
Does anyone know where can I find a convertion table that will tell me what a lens lenght is relatively in magnification factor?
spiderwood
Sunday 21st December 2003, 00:08
Generally 1x per 50mm, or 2x per 100mm.
So a camera with a 300mm lens gives approx the same view as a scope with 6x mag; 400mm gives 8x; 500mm gives 10x; 600mm gives 12x.
Same applies if using teleconvertors...
500mm+2x = 1000mm = 20x Mag.
600mm+2x = 1200mm = 24x Mag.
Hope that helps.
jose
Sunday 21st December 2003, 09:56
It’s exactly what I wanted to know. Many thanks
Tannin
Sunday 21st December 2003, 10:31
The factors are different with most digital cameras, though - at least I believe so. The factor is ... er ... I forget already. Roughly a third, so 500mm in a standard 35mm format is the equivalent of about 750 or 800mm if you are using it with a digital SLR.
Doubtless some kind soul will drop by shortly and give us the correct figures.
spiderwood
Sunday 21st December 2003, 11:04
Sprry...yes, I'm speaking about straight mag on a lens, and would be correct for straight 45mm or a DSLR with a full frame sensor (35mmx24mm).
If your Digicam/camera body has a different sensor size - eg like APS or smaller, then would be a slightly different magnification. EG. the Canon D60/10D has an extra 1.6x increase to those I gave above. Other cameras have different sizes..and yo need to check the manual...
Some will argue it's a crop and not a magnification factor...but the end result is the same.
So for the Canon 10D
a 500mm becomes a 720mm giving 14x
a 600mm becomes 960mm, giving 19x
add a teleconvertor (2x) and you get...
500 + 2x = 1000 x 1.6 = 1600mm = 32x
600 + 2x = 1200 x 1.6 = 1920mm = 38x
If only the world where simple!
vBulletin® v3.6.8, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.