PDA

View Full Version : Why spend more? $350 Orion 8x42 roof Savannah


Rich N
Thursday 23rd September 2004, 08:58
A couple of years ago I bought an Orion Savanna 8x42 roof prism binocular. It cost about $350 USD. The image quality isn't hugely different from my Leica 8x42BN or new Zeiss 10x42 FL. Yes, I can see a difference, but not so much that I would really miss a significant amount of detail on a bird. I could take them on a briding field hike and enjoy the view.

The Leica 8x42BN and Zeiss 10x42 FL give more of a feeling of looking out a large window. The image is brighter and certainly the Zeiss 10x42 FL has better resolution and contrast but the extra magnification makes the comparison a little more difficult. However, the image in the Savannah isn't bad. I don't think you would miss identify a bird using the Savannah that you would have gotten using the Leica BN.

The apparent field of view is smaller in the less expensive Savannah compared to my Leica but it isn't as bad as looking down a long narrow pipe either.

I guess the Savannah is much like some of the other "store brand" medium priced roofs.

I wouldn't be surprised if my Leica BN would take more of a beating and keep working than the Savannah. OTOH, I'm pretty careful with all my binoculars.

There is more CA with the Savannah but still not so bad that I hate to look through it. It really does make me think I'm a little nuts for buying the high end binoculars. :bounce:

Rich

Len Glasser
Thursday 23rd September 2004, 21:05
A couple of years ago I bought an Orion Savanna 8x42 roof prism binocular. It cost about $350 USD. The image quality isn't hugely different from my Leica 8x42BN or new Zeiss 10x42 FL. Yes, I can see a difference, but not so much that I would really miss a significant amount of detail on a bird. I could take them on a briding field hike and enjoy the view.

The Leica 8x42BN and Zeiss 10x42 FL give more of a feeling of looking out a large window. The image is brighter and certainly the Zeiss 10x42 FL has better resolution and contrast but the extra magnification makes the comparison a little more difficult. However, the image in the Savannah isn't bad. I don't think you would miss identify a bird using the Savannah that you would have gotten using the Leica BN.

The apparent field of view is smaller in the less expensive Savannah compared to my Leica but it isn't as bad as looking down a long narrow pipe either.

I guess the Savannah is much like some of the other "store brand" medium priced roofs.

I wouldn't be surprised if my Leica BN would take more of a beating and keep working than the Savannah. OTOH, I'm pretty careful with all my binoculars.

There is more CA with the Savannah but still not so bad that I hate to look through it. It really does make me think I'm a little nuts for buying the high end binoculars. :bounce:

Rich

Hello Rich,
You are not nuts. Several years ago, before I got to indulging myself on the high end optics, I also purchased 8x42 Savanah's. Still have them and I agree with all your comments. If all my high end optics were to dissapear overnight and I was forced to use them, I would not suffer. My wife loves them and uses them whenever we travel.
Len

Rich N
Friday 24th September 2004, 04:46
Hello Rich,
You are not nuts. Several years ago, before I got to indulging myself on the high end optics, I also purchased 8x42 Savanah's. Still have them and I agree with all your comments. If all my high end optics were to dissapear overnight and I was forced to use them, I would not suffer. My wife loves them and uses them whenever we travel.
Len

Thanks, Len!

Rich

Rich N
Saturday 25th September 2004, 10:39
This evening I was comparing my Orion Savannah 8x42 and Leica 8x42BN, it was amazing how close they were in image quality.

I'm going to take my Savannah (phase coated) to the local Orion
store and and compare it to the new Orion Savannah II. The new Savannah IIs are also phase coated.

Rich

Bill Atwood
Saturday 23rd October 2004, 05:44
The Savannah roofs look alot like the Celestron Regal/Noble, Eagle Optics Rangers and Alpen Apex. They are all priced similarly, except the Nobles which run about $100 less, presumably because they aren't phase coated. I have been told by Celestron that the latest Noble 8x42s are PC.

There are reports about the 8x42 models of all of the above having close to top of the line bin sharpness.

Orion, however, appears to offer only a 2 year limited warranty. Alpen has a limited lifetime warranty. Eagle Optics and Celestron have lifetime no-fault warranties.