Richard Scott
Thursday 9th December 2004, 20:50
When I began birding back in the seventies I remember the old-timers talking about the legendary British made Ross Stepruva 9x35 binoculars. Now I’m in the market for a pair of top-notch bins to replace my 10 year old Leicas, I can see that Leica, Swarovski, Nikon and Zeiss only seem to produce 7x, 8x, 8.5x and 10x magnification with a 32 or 42m objective for the birding market. What's happened to the number 9?
I think a designation of 9x35 or 9x36 would make a great birding binocular. It would be an ideal compromise between the 8x32 and 10x42. It would have the same exit pupil (near enough), and the size, weight, magnification, field of view and depth of focus would be fall between the two.
Swift made a brave move back in the late 70s (?) when they launched the 8.5x44 Audubons and cornered the birding market and more recently Swarovski had a similar effect with the 8.5x42 ELs. If one of the top brands were brave enough to launch a 9x36 I’d be the first in the queue for a pair.
Rich.
I think a designation of 9x35 or 9x36 would make a great birding binocular. It would be an ideal compromise between the 8x32 and 10x42. It would have the same exit pupil (near enough), and the size, weight, magnification, field of view and depth of focus would be fall between the two.
Swift made a brave move back in the late 70s (?) when they launched the 8.5x44 Audubons and cornered the birding market and more recently Swarovski had a similar effect with the 8.5x42 ELs. If one of the top brands were brave enough to launch a 9x36 I’d be the first in the queue for a pair.
Rich.