View Full Version : swift audubon kestrel 10x50 h. r. 5.
stuart C smith
Monday 11th December 2006, 21:07
i have a pair of swift kestrel 10x50 hr5. binoculars very, very, near mint . cased boxed etc anybody know how much their worth please. regards stuart.
chartwell99
Monday 11th December 2006, 21:36
i have a pair of swift kestrel 10x50 hr5. binoculars very, very, near mint . cased boxed etc anybody know how much their worth please. regards stuart.
I would guess $175+ but don't do it - I sold mine years ago and have regretted it ever since.
stuart C smith
Monday 11th December 2006, 21:39
I would guess $175+ but don't do it - I sold mine years ago and have regretted it ever since.
thanks chartwell99 thats not a lot of money.
chartwell99
Monday 11th December 2006, 22:04
thanks chartwell99 thats not a lot of money.
Unfortunately, full size porros with fold down rubber eyecups, faux leather (gutta percha) exterior and no weatherproofing are presently very much out of favor. I sold my Kestrel believing in error that it was redundant of my 8.5 x 44 Audubon. Both the Kestrel and the Audubon are superb glasses.
stuart C smith
Monday 11th December 2006, 22:10
Unfortunately, full size porros with fold down rubber eyecups, faux leather (gutta percha) exterior and no weatherproofing are presently very much out of favor. I sold my Kestrel believing in error that it was redundant of my 8.5 x 44 Audubon. Both the Kestrel and the Audubon are superb glasses.
thanks chartwell99 getting offers to buy already.
zurtfox
Tuesday 12th December 2006, 19:40
Hi Stuart,
Do you know what the eye relief is on them? I ask because I have a feeling it is in the region of 10mm which could cause problems with spectacle wearers.
Chris
stuart C smith
Tuesday 12th December 2006, 20:17
Hi Stuart,
Do you know what the eye relief is on them? I ask because I have a feeling it is in the region of 10mm which could cause problems with spectacle wearers.
Chris
hi chris, its 10mm regards stuart.
elkcub
Tuesday 12th December 2006, 21:24
i have a pair of swift kestrel 10x50 hr5. binoculars very, very, near mint . cased boxed etc anybody know how much their worth please. regards stuart.
Stewart,
Basically, you've got a reasonably hard to find collectible, which aficionados will pay more for based on condition and paperwork. For one in superb condition, $200-250 USD would not be unreasonable to expect in a bidding situation. If I didn't already own one in beautiful condition that's what I might be willing to pay. Incidentally, a near-mint standard 804 Audubon will fetch about $200 nowadays, and an 804ED about $400 if you can find one with nice cosmetics and in working condition. I think the 826 Audubon/Kestrel is less plentiful than the standard 804, but I have no production or sales numbers to base that on. Other than not being waterproof, I concur that both the 8.5x44 and 10x50 Audubons are magnificent instruments, only surpassed by the 804ED, in my opinion.
Incidentally, what are the first two digits of the serial number, i.e., the date, and is "Audubon" mentioned on it?
Ed
stuart C smith
Wednesday 13th December 2006, 17:57
Stewart,
Basically, you've got a reasonably hard to find collectible, which aficionados will pay more for based on condition and paperwork. For one in superb condition, $200-250 USD would not be unreasonable to expect in a bidding situation. If I didn't already own one in beautiful condition that's what I might be willing to pay. Incidentally, a near-mint standard 804 Audubon will fetch about $200 nowadays, and an 804ED about $400 if you can find one with nice cosmetics and in working condition. I think the 826 Audubon/Kestrel is less plentiful than the standard 804, but I have no production or sales numbers to base that on. Other than not being waterproof, I concur that both the 8.5x44 and 10x50 Audubons are magnificent instruments, only surpassed by the 804ED, in my opinion.
Incidentally, what are the first two digits of the serial number, i.e., the date, and is "Audubon" mentioned on it?
Ed
full digits 001012 , audubon is not mentioned on them. regards stuart
elkcub
Thursday 14th December 2006, 08:11
Well, as you already know, they were made in 2000. Mine are two years older, made in 1998. Lots of folks are probably jealous of us. hehe ;)
Enjoy the view,
Ed
PS. Sorry to misspell your name.
stuart C smith
Thursday 14th December 2006, 15:18
;) ;) Well, as you already know, they were made in 2000. Mine are two years older, made in 1998. Lot's of folks are probably jealous of us. hehe ;)
Enjoy the view,
Ed
PS. Sorry to misspell your name.
hi elkcub, dont worry about the spelling, i get called allsorts of things, as long as its not late for dinner i dont mind. thanks for your good wishes, if i get a really, really good price i might sell them as it will save the wife selling them when i am gone. kind regards stuart, living on the edge. ;)
WJC
Friday 22nd December 2006, 23:52
Well, as you already know, they were made in 2000. Mine are two years older, made in 1998. Lots of folks are probably jealous of us. hehe ;)
Enjoy the view,
Ed
PS. Sorry to misspell your name.
But then, some folks wouldn't--especially if they have the Audubon and Kestrel, nee Audubon 10x50, in their arsenal.
Merry Christmas, Ed,
Bill
vBulletin® v3.6.8, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.