View Full Version : Somali Ostrich
martinf
Thursday 15th February 2007, 22:46
What was the rationale for splitting molybdophanes into Somali Ostrich, althogh obviously some phenotypic differences. Where would the extinct syriacus form sit?
cuckooroller
Thursday 15th February 2007, 23:03
What was the rationale for splitting molybdophanes into Somali Ostrich, althogh obviously some phenotypic differences. Where would the extinct syriacus form sit?
The split of Somali Ostrich is primarily based on geographical, morphological, and genetic evidence.
Somali Ostrich Struthio molybdophanes
Reichenow 1883
Somalia; s Ethiopia; se Sudan; ne Kenya: s to Tsavo East NP
split from: Struthio camelus
insert after: Struthio camelus
S. Freitag & T.J. Robinson,
Phylogeographic Patterns in Mitochondrial DNA of the Ostrich (Struthio camelus)
The Auk 110, 3 (1993): 614-622
All the African races hybridize one with the other. I would imagine that syriacus would have done so as well. Sounds like one polytypic species to me.
Xenospiza
Thursday 15th February 2007, 23:11
Somali Ostrich was reported to be quite divergent in mtDNA (which is "split friendly") from all other extant Ostriches, but sampling sizes (except australis) were small (78 australis, 10 massaicus, 8 molybdophanes, 1 camelus). If it would hold up to closer scrutiny (like using AFLP markers, which is more "lump friendly") should really be investigated.
You can read it here: http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Auk/v110n03/index.php
I advise you to take the DjVu reader, because the pdf-files from the site tend to take forever...
njlarsen
Friday 16th February 2007, 01:30
I guess this shows that I have not read enough primary litterature lately, but are there really still people around using AFLP? Twenty years ago, they were hot because they could deliver some fast results without much prior knowledge of the species, but it was also widely agreed that they lived up to both parts of "quick and dirty"; especially because they underestimated the differential in that fragments that came out with the same size could originate in different parts of the genome.
Cheers
Niels
Xenospiza
Friday 16th February 2007, 09:13
Unless I'm really mistaken, they were used in the Green Warbler–Double-barred Leaf Warbler studies (which have something like 6 mtDNA clades, but a continuous change in the AFLP markers showed all populations were connected).
jurek
Friday 16th February 2007, 11:59
Syriacus was genetically and visually very similar to camelus except smaller size.
BTW, anybody knows about Asian Ostrich? There are some rumours (paintings on Chinese artifacts etc.) that Ostrich historically occured in C Asian steppes, too.
cuckooroller
Friday 16th February 2007, 23:03
Syriacus was genetically and visually very similar to camelus except smaller size.
BTW, anybody knows about Asian Ostrich? There are some rumours (paintings on Chinese artifacts etc.) that Ostrich historically occured in C Asian steppes, too.
Hi Jurek,
The fossil record is not clear on this. It is known that there were several Struthio sp. stretching from C China to SW Asia prehistorically. Supposedly the last of these Asian Struthio died out about the end of the last Ice Age. The artifactual testimony of the Middle Kingdom goes back about 8,000 years so it is possible that there was still something around living among the early Chinese.
njlarsen
Saturday 17th February 2007, 03:26
Unless I'm really mistaken, they were used in the Green Warbler–Double-barred Leaf Warbler studies (which have something like 6 mtDNA clades, but a continuous change in the AFLP markers showed all populations were connected).
Because you cannot really know if the fragment present in two different lanes are actually the same or not, I would have problems trusting a result made with AFLP ... If you want a result from the non-mitochondrial genome, use ten reactions for microsattelites instead, even though the total experiment will become more expensive. Or, sequence some introns.
Just my two cents
Niels
vBulletin® v3.6.8, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.