• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Zuiko Digital 50mm f2 macro - any user here? (1 Viewer)

Cristian Mihai

Cristian Mihai
I like to take macro shots and I've used for this purpose my birding lens (Zuiko Digital 70-300 mm and Zuiko Digital 50-200 mm SWD). These are long lens, so I have the usual problems: shallow DOF and a relative long minimum focus distance). I would try to use the 50 mm f2 (probably together with EC-14), because this lens have a minimum focus distance about 0,2 m. Any opinions about this lens? Maybe some shots too..
 
Last edited:
It is fantastic CM, superb, the best from Olympus digital lenses. i got it since June and used it in my sisters before wedding party and the shots were just superb.

used it also for macro shots extensively for some time and got some nice results. i also use it with the 25 EX tube,

also used it for some flying terns shots with the TC 20, which makes the max. f 4.0 which is also good at nicely bright days.

frankly it is much better than the ........... Zuiko 70-300mm.

if you like check this.

http://www.birdforum.net/gallery/showphoto.php/photo/268392/ppuser/71763

http://www.birdforum.net/gallery/showphoto.php/photo/267773/ppuser/71763

http://www.flickr.com/photos/ammadoux/3898058782/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/ammadoux/3823466509/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/ammadoux/3824260100/


i know some are not really sharp, but i cant focus with my glasses on, and i really need reading glasses.
 
I don't have this lens, but I read good reviews on it too. It is also a good indoor/portrait/everyday camera since it is f2.

However, for me, the price is a bit high and I'd probably consider the less pricey 35mm Macro F3.5. and it seems to focus a bit faster too.

Here're two flickr discussions with each lens, and both are provided with excellent photos from members:

50 f/2 - http://www.flickr.com/groups/zuikodigital/discuss/72057594065810835/
35 f/3.5 - http://www.flickr.com/groups/zuikodigital/discuss/72057594065810381/

But I think either would be excellent choice! Good luck.
 
I like to take macro shots and I've used for this purpose my birding lens (Zuiko Digital 70-300 mm and Zuiko Digital 50-200 mm SWD). These are long lens, so I have the usual problems: shallow DOF and a relative long minimum focus distance). I would try to use the 50 mm f2 (probably together with EC-14), because this lens have a minimum focus distance about 0,2 m. Any opinions about this lens? Maybe some shots too..

Hi Cristian, to cut a long story short I was planning to buy this lens last year but then saw a 35mm macro for half price in a local shop, so I bought that instead. With the EC-14 it gives 49mm, so very similar focal length, just with out the max aperture of F2. It's actually about F5 with the converter. I like the focussing speed but it struggles in low light, so I use manual focus.

I have no experience of the 50mm but reviews I've read indicate that it is optically as good or better than virtually any other macro on the market. I believe it does have some quirks with it's focussing, and no focus limiter (I think? can waste time going from minimum to infinity and back without this feature).

I haven't used the 35mm too much yet due to buying at the end of the summer last year, but from the results I've seen so far I can confirm it tales beautiful pictures. It also is useful as a portrait/walkabout lens as it is so small and light. You do need a very confiding subject with both Olympus macros (working distance of the 35mm/EC-14 is perhaps 10-20cm) and be aware that using the manual focus ring could further spook a wary subject. That said, before I bought an SLR I regularly shot butterflies and dragons at these close distances using a compact camera, with very good results. With good field craft all but the most skittish subjects can be approached very closely, but it does take care/patience.

As I see you are also looking into Canon, you could also consider the macro lenses in the 50mm, 60mm, 100mm, 150mm & 180mm focal lengths, both from Canon and Sigma, Tamron etc.

The Sigma 105 and 150 macros are both available for 4/3 cameras and might give you better working distance than the 50mm. Olympus also have a 100mm macro on their 'roadmap' but there is no sign of it coming out soon.

Hope this helps,

Steve

some 35mm/EC-14 shots:
 

Attachments

  • P7315970-2.JPG
    P7315970-2.JPG
    95.1 KB · Views: 96
  • P8036476.jpg
    P8036476.jpg
    110.1 KB · Views: 95
Last edited:
Hi Cristian. I wondered why you hadn't posted any shots taken with it. Make sure you check it for dust when it arrives. ;) Any further progress on the Canon gear yet?

Ron
 
Estimated delivery time: April 24th.

I'm looking forward to seeing how you get on with the new lens Cristian, when it finally arrives.

I'm not sure what your above comment meant re the Canon gear. Are you still planning to run two systems, or are you going to stick just with Olympus for the time being and hold off on the Canon?
 
Some test shots with 50 mm plus E-14. Hand held, windy day. The spider: about 3 mm long, the black insect around 10 mm long. The blue flower about 6 mm in diameter. I think I need a light tripod. I have a gorillapod but the combo E-520 + EC-14 + 50 mm f2 seems to be a little bit too heavy for it.
 

Attachments

  • P4251879m.jpg
    P4251879m.jpg
    124.5 KB · Views: 91
  • P4251936m.jpg
    P4251936m.jpg
    111.4 KB · Views: 73
  • P4252003m.jpg
    P4252003m.jpg
    104.1 KB · Views: 79
  • P4252177m.jpg
    P4252177m.jpg
    101.5 KB · Views: 71
  • P4251926m.jpg
    P4251926m.jpg
    134.6 KB · Views: 75
Last edited:
Nice test shots Cristian. Judging from those first flower shots, there is a very shallow DOF to take into consideration. I like the final shot of the ant in the yellow flower very much. Looking good.

Ron
 
Nice test shots Cristian. Judging from those first flower shots, there is a very shallow DOF to take into consideration. I like the final shot of the ant in the yellow flower very much. Looking good.

Ron

Thank you Ron. I don't think that the insect is an ant, looks more like a wasp/bee of some kind.
 
Sorry, Cristian. I was fooled by the head and antennae. I have had another look and I can see the hairy body and wings. A very well detailed shot.

Ron
 
Warning! This thread is more than 14 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top