• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Palaelodus: Cranial and Vertebral Morphology (1 Viewer)

Fred Ruhe

Well-known member
Netherlands
Gerald Mayr

Cranial and Vertebral Morphology of the Straight-billed Miocene Phoenicopteriform Bird Palaelodus and Its Evolutionary Significance

Zoologischer Anztiger on line first

Abstract: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.jcz.2014.10.002

Palaelodidae are the extinct sister taxon of flamingos (Phoenicopteridae). These Cenozoic birds are of significance for an understanding of flamingo evolution, because they have a short and straight beak and exhibit swimming adaptations, thus possibly bridging the morphological gap between flamingos and their closest extant relatives, the grebes (Podicipedidae). Palaelodus bones are very abundant in some fossil localities, but critical osteological details remained unknown, and for the first time more detailed descriptions of the neurocranium, quadrate, mandible, vertebrae, and pedal phalanges are given in the present study. Although the postcranial osteology of Palaelodus closely resembles that of extant flamingos, the skull is utterly different. The morphology of the mandible casts some doubt on previous assumptions that Palaelodus already evolved a filter feeding apparatus. The shape of the pedal phalanges supports swimming habits and differences in the vertebral column are described, which suggest a different feeding position than in extant flamingos. Derived features are identified, which are shared by flamingos, grebes, and some “gruiform” taxa, and which may constrain the candidate taxa for the closest extant relatives of flamingos and grebes.

Have fun,

Fred.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 9 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top