melop said:
Thank you for your detailed reply. So do you think Canon's better than Nikon?
I'm quite confused about the Canon D350 and Nikon D70s, it seems that D350 has higher dimension(8m px), but it is much cheaper than D70s. Why's that? Should I choose Nikon or Canon?
Need more advice.
Hi:
The D70 is a great camera. So likely is the D350 which I have never used.
The poster above likes the D70 as do I. He thinks Sigma lenses are a better deal than Nikon. Nikon telephoto lenses are generally EXPENSIVE. The good news is that Sigma is really doing a nice job in that area.
Re MPixels: MPs just are not the whole story. Not even close. Get the MP race out of your head. It is not that they are not important (for example, it's nice to have extra MP so you can crop a shot if your shooting small birds without losing resolution.) It is just that there are many other things that can add to the price of and results you get from a camera: focusing ability, buffer, frames per second, noise handling and high ISO performance, flash abilities and systems... etc.....
Look at the whole camera.
I liked the D70 because, when I bought it, it offered me a lot more control over exposure and metering than the Canon. I also liked the Nikon flash system. I compared cameras over a year ago though and have not done so lately. I remember the Canon in the same price range did not offer spot metering and that alone sent me looking at Nikons. Some folks might not find that even important.
Many folks buy Canon, in part, cuz of the lenses Canon offers. They have a broader selection of telephoto lenses that Birders are often concerned about.
I use the Sigma 500mm for birding with my D70 and have no regrets.
You can't go far wrong with either Nikon or Canon IMHO.
Good luck
Cheers,
Craig Ryder