To start off with the LX L's come in a much BETTER BOX! I mean why is it that Alpha binoculars always come in such a nice quality box and they even smell like they cost more. The build quality of the LX L's are much superior to the Monarch's and they appear more durabile.Tolerances are much closer and they LOOK more expensive. The focus, diopter and IPD adjustments all work better and operate smoother. The feel of the XL L's is better with it's new rubber armor feeling great in the hands. The case on the XL L's is also much superior being a nice soft leather with reinforcement in it so it is more rigid. The lining inside is nicer also and it snaps shut with a magnetic clasps like a Gucci purse or something. Way superior to the generic nylon slightly padded case that comes with the Monarch and again moe expensive looking. The objective covers on the LX L also seem of higher quality rubber and they fit the objectives without falling off like they do on the Monarchs. The rainguards again on the LX L also are better rubber and appear to be higher quality. You also get a little better strap on the LX L's. Now on to the binoculars themselves.
The LX L has a wider FOV, it has a larger sweet spot, and it is incredibly sharp to the edge. The resolution or sharpness in the sweetspot is also better on the LX L. A big difference is the superior depth of field on the LX L versus the Monarch. The LX L is beautiful when you look at say a forest of trees that are at varying distances from you and they are all in focus. I noticed this superior feature in all alpha binoculars including the Swarovski's and the Zeiss FL's. The LX L also has better contrast than the Monarch's and I believe they are a little brighter. There is not as much CA in the LX L either.
The Monarch's though for some reason have easier eye placement without as much blackouting as the LX L's. I am not sure why this is because the eye relief on both is about the same.
Overall I would put the Nikon LX L's on par with the Swarovski's and the Zeiss FL's and for alot less money. They are excellent binoculars.
Dennis
The LX L has a wider FOV, it has a larger sweet spot, and it is incredibly sharp to the edge. The resolution or sharpness in the sweetspot is also better on the LX L. A big difference is the superior depth of field on the LX L versus the Monarch. The LX L is beautiful when you look at say a forest of trees that are at varying distances from you and they are all in focus. I noticed this superior feature in all alpha binoculars including the Swarovski's and the Zeiss FL's. The LX L also has better contrast than the Monarch's and I believe they are a little brighter. There is not as much CA in the LX L either.
The Monarch's though for some reason have easier eye placement without as much blackouting as the LX L's. I am not sure why this is because the eye relief on both is about the same.
Overall I would put the Nikon LX L's on par with the Swarovski's and the Zeiss FL's and for alot less money. They are excellent binoculars.
Dennis
Last edited: