• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

What kind of snake is this? (1 Viewer)

bamabluebird

Well-known member
We're thinking that it may be a ratsnake, but not sure.
 

Attachments

  • snake 1.jpg
    snake 1.jpg
    69.7 KB · Views: 370
  • snake 2.jpg
    snake 2.jpg
    61.2 KB · Views: 517
  • snake 3.jpg
    snake 3.jpg
    66.5 KB · Views: 484
i live in central alabama if that's what you mean. i live out in the country so there are lots of open fields around my house. i haven't seen him since so hopefully he was "just passin' thru" and won't bother any of my birds.
 
keith richter said:
it looks poisonous. becuse if you look at the head if it is like a diamond it is poisonous. and i think it is a rat snake
I thought rat snakes were non-venemous?
 
bamabluebird said:
i live in central alabama if that's what you mean. i live out in the country so there are lots of open fields around my house. i haven't seen him since so hopefully he was "just passin' thru" and won't bother any of my birds.

It is a grey rat snake then. It is not poisonous, but it may take the odd bird I am afraid. But don't let that put you off, snakes have a bad press and need our help as much as the birds do.

Mark
 
well, at least i know for sure what it was. haven't seen it since. i didn't think it was poisonous. it obviously wasn't aggressive either. my boyfriend was taking the pictures of it (and getting kind of close to do that) and trying to steer it clear of the bird feeding area (it was headed straight for it!) and it didn't even try to strike.
 
Isurus said:
I thought rat snakes were non-venemous?
Rat snakes are venomous but are "Back fanged"this means that the fangs are at the back of the mouth and not the front rendering this species unable to strike.

Colin.
 
mothman said:
Rat snakes are venomous but are "Back fanged"this means that the fangs are at the back of the mouth and not the front rendering this species unable to strike.

Colin.

No they are not, the north American Ratsnakes are not rear fanged or venomous.

Mark
 
stronzo1 said:
No they are not, the north American Ratsnakes are not rear fanged or venomous.

Mark

Exactly. While the majority of colubrids do posses venom glands (formerly viewed as unique organels - Duvernoys glands - but now taken at face value again) there are still some that don't. Additionally, many venomous colubrids do not posses the modified dentition be be classed as rear fanged. For example, in the US Hognosed snake and Lyre snakes are rear fanged and venomous. The coachwhips are venomous but not rear fanged, while the American ratsnakes, kings, milks, gopher/bull snakes are non-venomous. The ratsnake issue can cause confusion as many Asian species are, indeed, venomous. But these are taxonomically very distinct from the American snakes of the same name.

A good bit of background info into this can be found on this PDF:

http://biology.bangor.ac.uk/~bss166/Publications/Colubritoxin.pdf

In the US, the only dangerously venomous snakes are the vipers/rattlers and the coral snake. All of which are easy enough to ID most of the time (biggest risk for confusion being corals/milksnakes and cottonmouth/water snakes).

The diamond shaped head division between ven. and non-ven. is woefully vague and is best forgotton as it doesn't work.

The snake pictured is indeed a ratsnake, Pantherophis obsoleta (Formerly Elaphe obsoleta).

Regards, Lee.
 
It looks like the black rat snakes we get here. They're very handsome. They bite when cornered but they're not dangerous. I remember seeing one on the road while Dad and I were out biking. He looked kind of kinked up, which, upon research, the rat snakes do when startled.

For the pit vipers, the broad head is the best identification. For coral snakes..."red touch yellow/dangerous fellow/red touch black/safe for Jack"
 
BRsnake

bamabluebird said:
We're thinking that it may be a ratsnake, but not sure.

I think it looks like the species is Rat snake. Black, Gray, Baird's, Texas, Yellow and Everglades Rat Snakes are all subspecies of Rat Snake. I would say yours subspecies is the Black Rat Snake - a very common snake in the south east.
 
LAF said:
Exactly. While the majority of colubrids do posses venom glands (formerly viewed as unique organels - Duvernoys glands - but now taken at face value again) there are still some that don't. Additionally, many venomous colubrids do not posses the modified dentition be be classed as rear fanged. For example, in the US Hognosed snake and Lyre snakes are rear fanged and venomous. The coachwhips are venomous but not rear fanged, while the American ratsnakes, kings, milks, gopher/bull snakes are non-venomous. The ratsnake issue can cause confusion as many Asian species are, indeed, venomous. But these are taxonomically very distinct from the American snakes of the same name.

A good bit of background info into this can be found on this PDF:

http://biology.bangor.ac.uk/~bss166/Publications/Colubritoxin.pdf

In the US, the only dangerously venomous snakes are the vipers/rattlers and the coral snake. All of which are easy enough to ID most of the time (biggest risk for confusion being corals/milksnakes and cottonmouth/water snakes).

The diamond shaped head division between ven. and non-ven. is woefully vague and is best forgotton as it doesn't work.

The snake pictured is indeed a ratsnake, Pantherophis obsoleta (Formerly Elaphe obsoleta).

Regards, Lee.




i seem to remember something about indian cobras escaping into the wild in florida some time ago.....
 
I believe Western Hogs are back fanged? In fact I'm almost certain, as I used to have one!! Also had a Burmese Python, Desert Boa, Tia Beauty Snake & a few commoner sp. Great animals but not that ideal when a family comes along....
 
Warning! This thread is more than 18 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top