No Paul, not another dig at your website, I was simply correcting an inadvertent error by Steve, something I notice you didn’t rush to correct. In your own reply to me you freely admit that your site is out of touch and people should use reputable bird services for up to date and accurate information, so what’s your problem?
If you’re not an information service why do you keep asking people for news, and what do you think people are coming to your site for? No Paul, whether you claim it or not, you are being used as an information service and as such you should keep it up to date or stop encouraging people to send you information. Otherwise you are guilty of suppressing news, which is what I said to your face when you tried to recruit me to your site.
So you haven’t got a clue Paul? You are either even more stupid than I gave you credit for or yet again you are trying to bluster your way out of a corner. In your arrogance, you asked me for evidence of mistakes with birds, and on your website. When I reeled off a list, you were been unable to refute any of them and went to ground. However, true to form you have reappeared with yet more ridiculous remarks.
Not aware I have had difficulties with Hen/Montague’s Harrier, but whatever, if you say so Paul, that’s fine by me.
Paul, your logic is fatally flawed to the point of being ridiculous. I do not need to be a “professional birder or Ornithologist” to be able to prove your ineptness. Indeed I do not even need to be a better birder than you, your own track record condemns you! Likewise with your incompetence, I do not need to run my own website to point out your shortcomings as an editor, they are there for all to see. The final sentence of your last reply to me perfectly illustrates my point if you think being concerned about spelling is anal. Again throughout this thread you have proved yourself disingenuous, with a trail of lies, half-truths, foul and offensive language. Morally bankrupt may be a bit strong but you have certainly cast serious doubt on your reliability and integrity. On the few occasions when we have met, your behaviour has only served to reinforce this view.
Funnily enough Paul, I also have received e-mails and phone calls supporting what I have said, some from quite surprising quarters! So I know I am not alone.
I’m not trying to ridicule you Paul, you are doing a perfectly good job on your own!
Kind regards
Dave Parker
P.S. Just to show I am prepared to praise you when you actually do something well, congratulations on your first two pelagics, they certainly came up trumps.
