After much reading and research I didn\\\'t really know what to expect since the reviews are so divided with this lens. Some love and some have nothing good to say about it at all... after taking the plunge and playing with it for a few weeks I\\\'m in the \\\"I love it\\\" catagory.
The images produced by my lens are superb, in fact I\\\'d say it is very, very close to being on par with Canon\\\'s finest L series super-teles. The biggest selling point for me though was its small size. It weighs a mere 4.3 lbs and is 9.2\\\" long(Compare that to Canon\\\'s 400mm f2.8 at 11.7lbs and 13.7\\\", the 500mm f4 at 8.5lbs and 15.2\\\", and the 600mm f4 at 11.8lbs and 18\\\" long). With a 1.4xTC the DO still produces stunning images like this one http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v156/britishcanuk/kinglet.jpg I feel that this lens is the perfect compromise of size, weight, quality, and features for travel and walkaround photography which is why I bought it.
Anybody that is looking into this lens will undoubtebly find the many negative reviewsas well, just as I did. I\\\'m convinced there must be some poor quality copies around so I suggest you try it out first if you can. If you can\\\'t, there seems to be a time in late 2002 that the quality of this lens became much more consistant. I really can\\\'t quantify this theory but alot of reading asking questions have led me and many others to think there is some validity to it.
Russ