|
Author
|
|
Tord S Eriksson
Tord
Registered: July 2010
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 41
|
|
Review Date: Tue November 30, 2010
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid?: $1,700.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Tough, fast, big sensor and durable
|
|
Cons:
|
Not FF!
|
|
The last year, or so, has seen four new DSLRs from Pentax, the first being the K-7, aimed at the pros, and advanced amateurs, that wanted a stylish, yet rugged camera, with lots of features, suitable for outdoor, and studio work, where the lighting is good. The 14MP sensor isn't the fastest around, so while the pros liked it quite well, some found the noise at ISO 3200 hampering.
Then came the cheap & mechanically noisy, but fast, K-x, that amazed with its huge dynamic range, and the ability to take photos at ISO 6400. Plastic feel, even if there is a steel frame inside, somewhere. Very much a cut-down version, with just the essentials, but nice speed!
The next came a model, that eventually will replace the K-x (if it hasn't already done so), which added some features of the K-7 to a K-x, thus improved ergonomics, speed and looks, plus more options in the menus.
Late in the year of 2010 came the K-5, which could be called a souped up K-7, with some nice new touches:
The K-5 is fully a pro-style DSLR, top-of-the-range at Pentax, which means it is has a durable, rain-proof body, made mostly out of magnesium. At a distance there is nothing that differs it from the K-7, but the K-5 logo, and a button, or two.
But what differs is the sensor: a 16+MP CMOS sensor from Sony (actually the same as you can find in the Sony A55), which gives the camera an astounding ISO range - expanded: 80-51400 (or basic setting: 100-12800).
But it is not the sheer ompf that really took me by storm, but the results of my photos with it, using the same lenses as before: The green grass is no longer just one green colour, but a spectrum of green colours - just as my eyes see it; the birds look much more alive, and so on.
Independent testers have found it to be performance-wise on par with Nikon D700, a camera loved by many.
In short, it should be called K-7 Mark II, and it so good that my critical wife, who used prefer her Olympus E-PL1 to my first Pentaxes - and shots taken side by side with her E-PL1, and my K-7, with as simlar lenses as possible (say the Panasonic 20mm pancake on hers, and DA21 on mine) almost always were won by her camera, at high ISO, or low.
At high ISO both stinks, by the way :-)!
I almost bought a D300S a year ago, but the sheer bulk of the camera scared me - I wanted a DSLR that would replace my favourite compact, my old Olympus C-8080, which is outstanding in some ways, and terrible in some other, not a behemoth (thus I ended up with the Pentax K-x).
My wife later thought about the Canon 550D, but that was just too big for her hands, so now we both have Pentax K-5s, and are very happy with our choices! The K-7 will be sold, soon!
Update, June, 2011:
I have now used my K-5 for quite a while, not least during a trip to Slimbridge and Newent, recently coming home. Sadly the K-5 fell on its back while attached to a monopod, which has forced me to send it off for repairs - auto focus didn't work quite right, nor could it use lenses with the focusing mechanism built-in at all.
Other than that it has worked effortlessly, but the camera has a problem with reds, including imfrareds, so I now have bought some IR-blocking Heliopan filters (very expensive) that seems to help a lot!
Update, August, 2011:
The repair took about a month, due to a lack of spare parts (in this case the tape that holds the replacement display 'glass' in place, as the original glass was slightly damaged when the camera fell on its back. The serious damage was to the bayonet, and that was fixed in a matter of minutes, but the tape took ages!
Update 2012:
then it refused to read the SD cards!!! Back to Pentax, and this time I got a brand new one - no further issues!
------------------------------
Tord S Eriksson,
enthusiast for everything done outdoors, including photography, and reading a good book!
Pentax K-x, K-7 & K-5, plus a heap of lenses from Pentax, Tamron & Sigma
|
|
|
|
gary1952
Second childhood and loving it.
Registered: February 2010
Location: Thailand
Posts: 77
|
|
Review Date: Sat April 2, 2011
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid?: None indicated
| Rating: 8
|
|
Pros:
|
High ISO, shutter speed, image qiality
|
|
Cons:
|
None after the pittiful K-7
|
|
I use this body for birding and wildlife only. Coupled with the Sigma 300mm f2.8 and the Sigma 500mm f4.5 lens. This is a pretty good combo now. I was in a panic with the K-7. It is still sitting in my bag unused. I used the K-x exclusively until the k-5. I only shoot during the day and evening. Never at night. AF is fine and has pegged most fast shots. So very peased so far.
Actually I have a flickr page dedicated to the Sigma 300mm f2.8 and the Sigma 500mm f4.5 lenses which is also with the Pentax K-5 or the K-x.
You can judge for yourself from the pics there. I have seen many pics with the 7D, D3s, and not really impressed. But I am sure they are not impressed with the Pentax K-5 either.
Retired I shoot everyday. So far the K-5 has proven it's worth. Rugged and built like a small tank. I really put it thru the works let me tell you. Rain forests and mud and all weather situations.
Update: 8/2/2011 I am starting to change from Pentax to Canon. I am having so many QC problems with the Pentax. AF is a hit or miss with the 300mm f2.8 lens. Very poor.
The IQ is great. But not a camera for birding in my opinion.
www.flickr.com/photos/avianphotos/
|
|
|
|
|
ariban
Registered User
Registered: August 2010
Location: Kolkata, India
Posts: 792
|
|
Review Date: Sat June 11, 2011
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid?: None indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Lovely High ISo, great AF and totally customizable. Built to last.
|
|
Cons:
|
Negative? Huh! What negative?
|
|
beautiful to look and beautiful to use. Right no. of buttons at the right places. Good easy to use menu. Fully customizable.
The AF is good and fast. better lenses of course help. All in all exudes reliability!
|
|
|
|
|
PentxOrni
Registered User
Registered: July 2011
Location: Riedstadt, Germany
Posts: 1
|
|
Review Date: Sun July 31, 2011
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid?: None indicated
| Rating: 8
|
|
Pros:
|
High ISO IQ, mostly inline/better vs CaNikons but lighter,smaller,tough
|
|
Cons:
|
AF features could be improved further
|
|
The K5 is a wonderful improvement over the K7. Especially in IQ at high ISO it's best in class in crop cam's together with Nikon's D7000 that seems to have a very similar sensor setup. Still looking sometimes to Canon 7D's AF features... there is still "room for improvement" for Pentax, e.g. AF manual selection of fields on other than DA-lenses. But this is very small wishlist item for the future ;-)
Almost all of my fotos are shot with Pentax:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/avifuzz...7627174256633/
Am using Sigma 300 2.8 plus 1.4 TC, DA*300 plus 1.5 TC or most recently the new "Bigma" 50-500 that shows also nice improvement over the long lasting evergreen...
|
|
|
|
|
JSER
Forum Member
Registered: July 2011
Posts: 265
|
|
Review Date: Sun July 31, 2011
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid?: None indicated
| Rating: 0
|
|
Plastic pentax. Pentax lost their way, I remember the Spotmatic, Me, LXand super, when though Nikon and Canon introduced the 10D and Nikon the D100, up to even now Pentax have the silver plastic cheap looking DSLRs.
But what of the KR, K7, RX, the K5 is ok, however like it or not design and asthetics count for a lot these days and Pentax are lagging, Canon and Nikon "look the part" Pentax looks 5 years out of date,but for the price I will stay with Canon and Nikon.
Shame as the K5 is indeed a very good camers.
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/pentaxk5/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to BirdForum.
