|
Author
|
|
Vogelaar.nl
Registered User
Registered: November 2003 Location: Helmond, The Netherlands Posts: 15
|
|
Review Date: Mon December 15, 2003
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid?: $2,600.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
almost everything!
|
|
Cons:
|
maybe the prize....but quality has its prize!
|
|
this is the only telescope aroung with almost perfect vueing capabilities, superb colors and
a Very well thought off design, everything is topquality, and it's the only scope ever on wich i have a good sight WITH my glasses on!
Only the prize is a bit high for the average person!
But quality has a prize!
|
|
|
|
IanF
Moderator
Registered: August 2002 Location: Billingham, NE England Posts: 55451
|
|
Review Date: Fri March 12, 2004
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid?: None indicated
| Rating: 9
|
|
Pros:
|
Compact design, lightweight, ergonomically eyecatching, optics excellent
|
|
Cons:
|
Lack of fine focus adjustment
|
|
I use this scope with the 20-60x eyepiece. For normal scope use then I don\'t think it can be faulted. The eyepieces give a wide field of view and it performs very well even in low light conditions.
Personally though I like to use my scope for digiscoping as well and for that I think it is less well suited than other high-end scopes. It\'s main disadvantage is the helical focus ring. In order to focus the scope you basically have to grab the scope body causing vibration in order to achieve a fine focus. Many other models on the market, in particular the Kowa 823, Zeiss Diascope and Leica have a fine focus adjustment knob which allows delicate one finger adjustment to fine focus the scope.
Whilst of the highest quality optically it is by no means the be all and end all of spotting scopes.
------------------------------ Durham Bird Club -Teesmouth Bird Club---RSPB Saltholme---Durham Birding---Local patch - Cowpen Bewley Woodland Park
|
|
|
|
Henry Chuo
Registered User
Registered: July 2004 Location: Taipei Posts: 3
|
|
Review Date: Tue August 3, 2004
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid?: $2,030.00
| Rating: 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Mac
Just sleeping
Registered: August 2004 Location: Vancouver, British Columbia Posts: 275
|
|
Review Date: Wed October 20, 2004
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid?: $2,000.00
| Rating: 8
|
|
Pros:
|
optics, light weight, compact
|
|
Cons:
|
cost
|
|
Price paid is with 20x-60x zoom eyepiece. I give it an 8, there\\\'s always room for improvement. The image at 20x is stunning, I wish it would continue up to 60x (I know, dream on). I love how light it is, barely more than my old Bushnell Spacemaster. I\\\'m thinking of getting a fixed power eyepiece to take advantage of the optics. I\\\'m still grovelling to my wife though, the kit was $3150 Canadian by the time it got through my door.
|
|
|
|
wizard
Registered User
Registered: January 2003 Location: South Wales Posts: 233
|
|
Review Date: Mon November 15, 2004
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid?: None indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
best buy, cost a lot but you one need to spend once
|
|
Cons:
|
the price, but you do get what you pay for
|
|
i had a good look around before parting with my cash so knew what i wanted, found the best price at the time & went for it. i wanted a light tripod so it was easy to carry, weight being my main concern and i dont stand up watching in the wind so it didnt have to be solid as a rock & weigh about the same. i went for a manfrotto 290N which works fine & fits into my back pack along with the scope so easy to get around. 20-60X zoom works great for watching birds of prey in old quarry\'s (see why i dont need a huge tripod) i had the Swarovski case which is much better than a Skau as it fits like a glove & being made for this scope you have no flaps or annoying velcro etc, i have a daylight/UV filter on protecting the lens as well as doing it\'s job. a second fixing shoe also helps & i have this on my camera so the tripod really is versitile. well worth every penny and the place i had it from will do a good deal & match or better any price http://www.waltersphotovideo.co.uk/ no i dont get commision but they are good to deal with. my bins are Leica 8-12x42 and they are a great combination. go one spend you money on the best, you only live once and there are no pockets in shrowds :-)
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
teamsaint
squeaker
Registered: January 2006 Location: Hampshire, UK Posts: 2809
|
|
Review Date: Sun May 14, 2006
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid?: None indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Sharp image, easy to use and control and not too heavy.
|
|
Cons:
|
None
|
|
------------------------------ Tom
My Gallery: http://www.birdforum.net/gallery/sho...0/ppuser/34765
|
|
|
|
Seaforth87
Registered User
Registered: April 2005 Location: Seaforth, UK Posts: 23
|
|
Review Date: Sun August 8, 2010
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid?: None indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
bright, great field of view, sturdy
|
|
Cons:
|
price
|
|
Combined with a 20-50WA zoom this Swarovski HD scope is superb. Bright, easy to focus, reliable and sturdy and easy to clean and wipe moisture off. This scope is simply brilliant. Obviously one has to accept that its fairly big and heavy but its lighter than many of its size. Purchasing it is somewhat expensive but right now its in the top three scopes on the market and as good as there is for all round birding including seawatching and digiscoping.
|
|
|
|
lmans66
Registered User
Registered: November 2006 Location: South Jersey, USA Posts: 1470
|
|
Review Date: Thu October 13, 2011
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid?: None indicated
| Rating: 10
|
|
Pros:
|
Helican Design, ergonomics, quality, glass, size, rubber armor, eyepiece, digiscoping adapters
|
|
Cons:
|
price
|
|
As Ian stated 'It\'s main disadvantage is the helical focus ring'.... Nah, I don't buy that so it goes to show you how different each of us are on our thinking and our needs. To me, the helical design makes it real easy to achieve focus and by using a timer on my camera, the scope is solid, no wobble...
The helical design to 'me'...is so much easier to use than one where I have dual knobs to worry about. The large helical design allows me to focus with gloves on in the middle of winter...something I find almost impossible with the small dual knobs.
Again, my personal opinion but this scope is tops among all....
------------------------------ lmans
Canon 7D; 40D, Canon 400mm F5.6L, Canon 200F2.8 L, Swarovski 80HD ATM
www.EcuadorBirdingAdventures.com
http://lmans66.zenfolio.com/
|
|
|
|
laccaria
Registered User
Registered: March 2012 Location: Bremen Posts: 23
|
|
Review Date: Mon November 5, 2012
|
Would you recommend the product? Yes |
Price you paid?: None indicated
| Rating: 0
|
|
Pros:
|
Image quality
|
|
Cons:
|
-
|
|
Recently, I was able to compare the STS80 HD with 20-60x eyepiece to the Leica Apo Televid 77 with 20-60x eyepiece, Leica Apo Televid 82 with 25-50x ASPH eyepiece, Nikon EDG 85 A with 20-60x eyepiece and the Nikon ED82 with 25-56x eyepiece. The clear winner in optical performance is the STS80 HD, followed by the EDG 85. Both were sharp up to 60x!! To my eyes, the field of view was a bit smaler in the Swaro, but the view was slightly better. The worst in the test was the older Televid, becaue of some optical disorders after 40x. The new Apo Televid 82 dropped dramatically in image quality in twilight, but at daylight the wide and extremely flat field of view was impressive. I think for the Nikon ED82 the 25-56x isn't the best choice, because of the smale field of view. The image quality was really nice. My favorite is the EDG 85 because of the FSA-L2 zoom adapter for my CANON camera. If anyone is intersted in more information, no problem, questions are welcome! Regards Sebastian
|
|
|
|
|