• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Where premium quality meets exceptional value. ZEISS Conquest HDX.

gulls (11 Viewers)

looks like the same adult bird in all pics. very nice displaying its typical caspian wing. left p5 mark broken? (first pic). and very pale iris! (see 4th pic). :t:
 
Some more pics.
 

Attachments

  • P4230289m.jpg
    P4230289m.jpg
    107.1 KB · Views: 93
  • P4230468m.jpg
    P4230468m.jpg
    104 KB · Views: 90
  • P4230491m.jpg
    P4230491m.jpg
    112.7 KB · Views: 88
  • P4230549m.jpg
    P4230549m.jpg
    78 KB · Views: 94
  • P4230561m.jpg
    P4230561m.jpg
    72.3 KB · Views: 82
more pics.
 

Attachments

  • P4230564m.jpg
    P4230564m.jpg
    109 KB · Views: 73
  • P4230565m.jpg
    P4230565m.jpg
    103.1 KB · Views: 84
  • P4230593m.jpg
    P4230593m.jpg
    89.5 KB · Views: 77
  • P4230594m.jpg
    P4230594m.jpg
    124.4 KB · Views: 79
  • P4230596m.jpg
    P4230596m.jpg
    135.9 KB · Views: 78
Some 2cy, 3cy and 4cy birds. For all of them more pics are available.
 

Attachments

  • P4230236m.jpg
    P4230236m.jpg
    111.1 KB · Views: 233
  • P4230294m.jpg
    P4230294m.jpg
    129.1 KB · Views: 230
  • P4230331m.jpg
    P4230331m.jpg
    129.1 KB · Views: 57
  • P4230379m.jpg
    P4230379m.jpg
    136.2 KB · Views: 67
  • P4230411m.jpg
    P4230411m.jpg
    115.1 KB · Views: 69
Last edited:
very nice cristian,

3cy mich, 3cy cach, 2cy cach, 2cy cach, 4cy mich

i hope i can get to photograph some large gulls once again on my trip with birding tourists through dobrogea, d-delta, baragan and carpathians soon (4.-13.may), don't have your mobile nr, could you tell it to me once more please in a PM?
 
very nice cristian,

3cy mich, 3cy cach, 2cy cach, 2cy cach, 4cy mich

i hope i can get to photograph some large gulls once again on my trip with birding tourists through dobrogea, d-delta, baragan and carpathians soon (4.-13.may), don't have your mobile nr, could you tell it to me once more please in a PM?

Your Inbox for PM is full, Lou.
 
Hi Guys,

I was wondering what your thoughts on this little conundrum would be. This bird was photographed on mudflats close to Happy Island, NE China a week or so ago. At a distance, the relatively large size, bulk, pot-bellied appearance indicated Relict Gull, at which folk were relatively happy with. It was slightly bigger and bulkier than nearby Black-headed Gulls but I had some reservations and made my way out onto the mudflats and approached the bird. The images are poor I know, sinking mud, very windy conditions, scope disappearing into the abyss, the usual excuses! There are a couple of features that I wasn't totally happy with, the rather snouty appearance for one, Relict's don't usually show such bill length in my experience. The primaries - retarded? Unfortunately I didn't manage to see or get shots of the upperwing pattern, which apparently looked good, no white leading edge etc It ticks some boxes but perhaps not others, appreciate your thoughts.

Mark
 

Attachments

  • DSCN9358.jpg
    DSCN9358.jpg
    33.2 KB · Views: 74
  • DSCN9361.jpg
    DSCN9361.jpg
    38.9 KB · Views: 64
  • DSCN9364.jpg
    DSCN9364.jpg
    29.7 KB · Views: 56
Last edited:
Hi all,

Describing the age of gulls:

Most of us on here like to use the term 'calendar' when ageing gulls. That is, a 2nd calendar refers to a bird born the previous calendar year.

However, most people still prefer '1st winter, 2nd winter' etc. This seems to be the case for bird reports written in Kent (Dungeness Bird Obs, Sandwich bird Obs, Kent Ornithological Society etc). I'm currently writing up the gull species accounts for the Kent Ornithological Society's bird report.

Most gulls are quite straightforward. But the white-wingers are not. Bird reports to date refer to 1st/2nd calendar Iceland and Glaucous as '1st winters'. Now, as they don't start to moult their juvenile feathers until Mar or later, I want to refer to them as 'juveniles'. OK?

I photographed an Iceland Gull in Mar 08 which had moulted some of its mantle and scapular feathers. Should I refer to this bird as a 1st summer. Note that one report refers to these as 2nd winter (from Apr onwards in 2nd calendar year!).

What do you think?

Cheers,

Andy.
 
Hi Guys,

I was wondering what your thoughts on this little conundrum would be. This bird was photographed on mudflats close to Happy Island, NE China a week or so ago. At a distance, the relatively large size, bulk, pot-bellied appearance indicated Relict Gull, at which folk were relatively happy with. It was slightly bigger and bulkier than nearby Black-headed Gulls but I had some reservations and made my way out onto the mudflats and approached the bird. The images are poor I know, sinking mud, very windy conditions, scope disappearing into the abyss, the usual excuses! There are features that I'm not happy with, the rather snouty appearance for one, Relict's don't usually show such bill length in my experience. The primaries - retarded? Unfortunately I didn't manage to see or get shots of the upperwing pattern, which apparently looked good, no white leading edge etc It ticks some boxes but perhaps not others, appreciate your thoughts.

Mark

hi mark you lucky man,

i don't see much that excludes an adult relict gull here. primary pattern with the clearly visible white mirrors and dark tip to p9,10 but also the very pointed tip of its bill looks ok, maybe on the long side for relict. but i don't have any experience with this sp. other than from images and books (that's why i called you a lucky man..). surely it's no other hooded species occuring in that region and i don't think we are looking at a hybrid here.

all the best

p.s. - i hope tha was a joke with scope in the abbyss ;) - such horrors happened to most of us though at a time given...
 
Warning! This thread is more than 5 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top