• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Olive-backed Pipit and Gt Grey Shrike Bahrain (1 Viewer)

Hello Howard.

Agree with Andrea.

The pipit shows characters more in line with Tree pipit than Olive-backed.

Note in the Olive-backed below the distinct white supercilium which is unstreaked and white only behind the eye and bordered blackish above, rich buff in front of the eye and part of the lore closest to the bill. The white spot below the rear end of the white supercilium is of variable size and seems always to show rather well, and a dark spot immediately below the white spot. However this white spot is also seen in some Tree and sometimes as obvious as the well marked Olive.

http://www.club300.se/Gallery/ViewImage.aspx?imageID=7485

http://www.club300.se/Gallery/ViewImage.aspx?imageID=4077

Note the almost unstreaked back (yunnanensis - which would be the race found also in Bahrain).

http://www.club300.se/Gallery/ViewImage.aspx?imageID=4078

Also whitish breast is a good indication of Tree over Olive which at this time of year is richer buff compared to paler in Tree.

JanJ
 
I think you had better email Brendan - [email protected] -- I was not there when the bird was ringed - however have you compared the measurements given with those in Svensson - Bill width and depth too small for trivialis (tree) at 3.6 and 3.3 hind claw was only 6.8 and measurements of 5th primary at 2.5 and distinct emargination on this plus colouration of tail feathers 4, 5, 6
many factors in favour of Olive-backed over Tree

I am more interested myself in the Shrike
 
Last edited:
Talking in general, ringers are too strict in considering measurements or thinking that a acros or phyllos could be just identified on wing formula or hind claws and that they are the only one able to age a bird ... and that anything outisde Svensson is not identifiable. Always had this problem in Italy (as for. ex. they have no idea how to ID. an Eastern Bonelli's Warbler and about the call, therefore I had to fight to let my obs. in Sicily accepted)

I've seen Song Thrush as small as a Swainson's and a Bar-tailed Godwit preserved at Catania University Museum (here in Sicily) as big as a Marbled Godwit ....

We should be able always to combine measurements with filed apparance and birds characters....

As opposite, most birders are still convinced that pale tips to greater coverts, in for ex. turdidae, are just surely a 1st y bird feature (I've handled a Robin with such tips being ringed 4 yeasr earlier, and many other examples)... or that a marsh harrier with pale shoulders are adult females...

So, always advisable to combine both practise and knowledges....

Anyhow, your pipit its indeed a Tree Pipit without any doubt,

as for the shrikes, I'll check and see what could be figured out...

thanks

Andrea
 
I have passed your comments on to Brendan he will reply in due course himself - however I would point He is a bloody good birders as well as a ringer. I think its fair to say as a University Proffessor he does not make ANY of his decisions without due consideration of all factors - He did a lot of work on Grey Partridge I remember him saying - can't remember how long he's been ringing though but I know its longer than I have be birding.

But this links might help you

http://www.google.com.bh/search?hl=...avanagh&as_q=birds&btnG=Search within results
 
Ok...may be I could be wrong...who knows... :)

Would you be happy if I send the link to my good friend Lars Svensson and ask his master opinion?

May be also to the great Killian Mullarney or Hans Larsson?

I would be happy to may help as probably it is a rare record indeed for your country, therefore its better and always advisable to be 1000% sure and sought for as most opinion as possible (see about the recent Italian Willet, I was sure but I asked support to as many as possible person)...

Cheers and thanks

Andrea Corso
 
However, indeed interesting and difficult bird as underparts streaking/spotting quite interesting as well as tertails and remiges pattern and colour etc...

as well as measurements indeed

so deserve more study about

Andrea
 
Send the link by all means - we have no objections at all, we welcome all comments and suggestions - Its all part of the leaning curve - It has to be said that there is so little information on birds passing through the middle east that not only for this species but for many others we often struggle with simply ID's as the measurements taken are inconsistent with those expected. Many species are not at all well documented in terms of variance for these part of the world hence my questions on the shrike and previously the Clamorous Reed Warbler.

Last year Oman was hit by a cyclone so who knows what wintering species it drew into the region from Asia, cyclones in the Sea of Oman although scarce are a regular feature. Birds caught up in such weather would after then move north through the gulf, assuming that is the urge to move north remains instinctive for that species. I should think covering the gulf there are less than 30 birders from Oman to Kuwait, maybe even less. So we probably miss more than we see, it is a much under watched part of the world.

Add to this that some of the old records, visual observations that is, including some of mine I have to say I now know are dubious. We also have to contend with those from visiting birders who misidentify our species here for those they are familiar with as plumage seen here on migration for many species is unlike anything previously encountered or illustrated in field guides.
 
I should think covering the gulf there are less than 30 birders from Oman to Kuwait, maybe even less. So we probably miss more than we see, it is a much under watched part of the world. ...

And you all do a very good work and rather hard one...

therefore compliments...

As I love North African and Middle Eastern countries I would like to help, that's it.

I would love to go to Kuwait, this winter my best friend Hans "HASSE" Larsson invited me to join his Swedish team but I was short of money to join :-( So SAD!

They have seen so many nice species, and came back very full and satisfied!

I would ask also him about the pipit, that indeed, looking with a fresher, more objective eye, later after first impression, is rather interesting and odd bird indeed....

Hans' opinion wuld be helpful as he is one of the very TOP birder I ever met and I knew...


Thanks foir sharing all your ME records and obs.


Another matter, in the ringing webpage you sent as link, after some pages of searching through the photos, I noticed a Desert Wheatear ringed as Isabelline WH. or at least labelled on the webpage as so....

I think it shouldn't be Issy, a species which I knwo rather well

If you like we can discuss also about this...
 
Oops that probablly me if its a mistake - hopefully a simple typo - often I do the updates late at night or first thing in the morning normally at 5 before going to work we start at 7 so errors are easily made email me on

correct you where right I found the error put the wrong days pictures up

on Isabelline - I think this week we have trapped nine so far only 2 desert - tomorrow morning we are going after Mourning, Red Tailed, Desert,and Isabelline plus Pied, Black-eared and Northern if they have started to move up - all are to be found at one site.
 
Last edited:
I've ringed many spring and fall Trees and just one fall Olive-backed so I don't have extensive experience on both species, but I'd be veeeery surprised if this bird is not a Tree Pipit. Primary tips hardly longer than wing tips (noticiably longer in Olive-backed), head design very pro-Tree, can't see anything wrong with the underparts or back streaking for Tree-looks fine to my eyes, tertial colours also more in line with Tree, p-5 (6) looks shorter than p-4 (7) - should look almost equal in Olive-backed.
Check this october Olive-backed wing for comparison of tertial lenght/pattern/colours and wing formula:
 

Attachments

  • Reajustado_Ant hod 16.jpg
    Reajustado_Ant hod 16.jpg
    40.5 KB · Views: 178
Motmot said:
I've ringed many spring and fall Trees and just one fall Olive-backed so I don't have extensive experience on both species, but I'd be veeeery surprised if this bird is not a Tree Pipit. Primary tips hardly longer than wing tips (noticiably longer in Olive-backed), head design very pro-Tree, can't see anything wrong with the underparts or back streaking for Tree-looks fine to my eyes, tertial colours also more in line with Tree, p-5 (6) looks shorter than p-4 (7) - should look almost equal in Olive-backed.
Check this october Olive-backed wing for comparison of tertial lenght/pattern/colours and wing formula:
Click to expand...

Can say anything myself or pass further comment - I was not in Bahrain when the Bird was caught - Brendan did the ringing Jahanni took the photos.

Can you contact Brendan directly his email is - [email protected]
 
Hind claw 6.8 (see photo!)
Wing 85
Weight 17.9
Tail 58
Bill skull 15.0
Bill depth 3.3 (dist edge nostril)
Bill depth (Proximal edge of nostril) 3.6
Bill width (Proximal edge of nostril) 4.2
Emargination 3,4,5
2nd Primary 4/5
5th Primary 2.5 less than Wing point

The bill measurments are particularly important as they are totally inconsistant with Tree pipit but fit well with A.h yunnanensis
 
That's what I found after checking some data in Alstrom&Mild Pipits and Wagtails and also Svensson's passerines:

Hind claw 6.8 (see photo!)- Good for both sps
Wing 85 - Good for both
Weight 17.9 - Good for both
Tail 58 - Good for both
Bill skull 15.0 - Good for both
Bill depth 3.3 (dist edge nostril). No data.
Bill depth (Proximal edge of nostril) 3.6. Tree (Siberia) 3.8-4.9/Olive-backed (Svensson; no data in Pipits and Wagtails) 3.6-4.6. Very slightly better for Olive-backed.
Bill width (Proximal edge of nostril) 4.2. Tree 4.0-4.7/Olive-backed 3.8-4.5 (Svensson; no data in Pipits and Wagtails). Good for both.
Emargination 3,4,5. Good for both
2nd Primary 4/5. Tree 4/5. Olive-backed 5/6. Good for Tree.
5th Primary 2.5 less than Wing point. Good for both (Svensson).

So, the only I found that matches better Olive-backed is bill depth proximal and only very slightly. I don´t think that'll make a strong case for this bird being an Olive-backed. Sorry.
 
I agree with Motmot!

Svensson says that Olive-backet has almost fully coloured (olive-brown) outer web of outer tail feather and this does not match in this individual.

Although Svensson says too that Tree Pipit's outer tf is much like in Olive-backet, but I think that this is not exact description from reality!!

I think that this outer web of outer tf is one feature which differs these species: at least follow pic the outer web of outer tf in Tree is almost pale as in this case.
And this feature (and the colour of supercium, etc) refers to Tree indeed.
http://www.tarsiger.com/images/hande/Anttri1.jpg
 
Motmot can you email Brendan - I have posted his email again - [email protected] - Brendan would love to discuss the bird with a fellow ringer especially someone with experience of both species in the hand - I can only make a guess from the pictures and I am not particularly familiar with either species and have never seen Olive-backed - as said before I was away in the states at the time the bird was ringed.
 
Last edited:
Howard King said:
Motmot can you email Brendan - I have posted his email again - [email protected] - Brendan would love to discuss the bird with a fellow ringer especially someone with experience of both species in the hand - I can only make a guess from the pictures and I am not particularly familiar with either species and have never seen Olive-backed - as said before I was away in the states at the time the bird was ringed.
Click to expand...

I'll email him.
 
hannu said:
I agree with Motmot!

Svensson says that Olive-backet has almost fully coloured (olive-brown) outer web of outer tail feather and this does not match in this individual.

Although Svensson says too that Tree Pipit's outer tf is much like in Olive-backet, but I think that this is not exact description from reality!!

I think that this outer web of outer tf is one feature which differs these species: at least follow pic the outer web of outer tf in Tree is almost pale as in this case.
And this feature (and the colour of supercium, etc) refers to Tree indeed.
http://www.tarsiger.com/images/hande/Anttri1.jpg
Click to expand...

In this pic you can see the outer tf outer web of an october Olive-backed. It is fully coloured olive-brown indeed. Unfortunately the outer tf in Tree is not too different, maybe paler in some individuals but surely is quite variable in both sps. Check outer tf of autumn Tree down the linked page and compare:

http://www.ibercajalav.net/img/312_Anthus_trivialis.pdf
 

Attachments

  • Reajustado_Ant hod 18.jpg
    Reajustado_Ant hod 18.jpg
    245.9 KB · Views: 173
Last edited:
Warning! This thread is more than 16 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Similar threads

Azan Khan
Olive-backed Pipit or Tree Pipit?
Replies
10
Views
1K
Himalaya
H
Brian Stone
Tenerife January 2024
Replies
11
Views
1K
MKinHK
MKinHK
Evan Atkinson
2 days at Pig Bush, Hampshire.
Replies
4
Views
871
Evan Atkinson
Evan Atkinson
I
Analysis Paralysis- Please help me choose!
2 3
Replies
42
Views
2K
Patudo
P
Evan Atkinson
Another lovely morning at Pig Bush, Hampshire! 30th July 2023
Replies
6
Views
797
Scozmos
Scozmos

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Back
Top