No Regrets
Dear all,
I thought I'd have a look to see if there had been any further debate about the Cinnamon Teal's providence during the past week since it hass been a week to the day that I went to see it. Well, I'm pleased to see that a bird of obviously little consequence in terms of it's place on the British list has stirred up such a debate. Mind you, in my experience, the more unlikely the bird, the more talk there is about it.
Obviously I agree this species is an unlikely genuine vagrant. I didn't leave home without first having read about rejections of this species in the USA on the Internet, so I had my eyes wide open when I filled the car with petrol. However, geographically, the Western Isles are well placed for American vagrants to arrive so it adds more credibility to the bird being there than in Hampshire. As I said in my original post, I have seen three Cinnamon Teals myself, each within 20 miles of my home and most unlikely to be genuine by a long chalk.
The photos are poor admittedly, but following the birding code of conduct precluded me from climbing the fencing surrounding the loch, walking through a field of sheep with lambs and possibly blowing future visitor's chances of seeing it. I know such selflessness is unusual in today's birding environment, but that's just the kind of guy I am. The gale outside didn't help much either.
When did this bird arrive? I doubt it was the day news broke somehow. Whether this loch is well watched or not is anyone's guess but if the number of birds that I saw on it is anything to go by - I rather doubt it. In fact, I did hear it was found during a wader survey, so maybe this loch isn't watched at all regularly. If anyone knows any different I'd be interested to know.
To sum up, I personally made the decision to go based on mere probability and not certainty of a wild origin. I also did the same with such birds as Spur-Winged Plover and Ross's Goose. Waiting for certainty in birding often invites failure to see the bird anyway and since hindsight is the only exact science, I'd rather go to see the bird as soon as I can and live with the prospect of having fate step in to reveal whether the bird is wild or not.
Take the Whistling Swan near Glasgow a few years ago for example. I saw that the evening news broke only to find out later it was feeding from the hand. I had wasted my time - but at the time I had no evidence to prove the bird 'guilty' or 'innocent'. It was just one of those things. So what? Win some, lose some, that's what birding is about surely?
By the way, if that swan had appeared in a flock of wild swans at Welney I presume it would have been acceptable without any problems?
Best wishes,
Lancey