• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

What Kind of Hawk In Flight? (1 Viewer)

It appears you're right. Don't bet much on my opinion, though, as someone will probably come along and say it's something else.
 
I believe you're right, and a juvenile also.

The carpal joints (wrists) would protrude farther than this bird's do and also the tail to me looks rounded at the edges suggesting Cooper's hawk!

-Matt
 
actually now I'm second guessing myself, the wings are broad yes, but the tail doesn't look long enough for an accipiter, I'm staying with my Coop's theory for now but...

Could it be a Juvie Red-Shouldered or am I right with juvenile cooper's hawk.

-Matt
 
Why couldn't it be a Red-shouldered Hawk? It has what look like wing crescents and the tail looks short for a Cooper's and broad for either Sharp-shin or Cooper's.
 
Last edited:
Why couldn't it be a Red-shouldered Hawk? It has what look like wing crescents and the tail looks short for a Cooper's and broad for either Sharp-shin or Cooper's.

You know, now after looking hard at the picture again the wing tips are kind of translucent, maybe it could be as I suggested earlier a juv RSH, but then again maybe not I don't know.

I changing my vote again to undecided!;)

-Matt
 
Hello Larry.

Do you have som more images? A Red-shouldered Hawk doe´s not have barred 'fingers', unless it´s an adult, which this bird isn´t. The shape of the wings, with bulgig secondaries, pinched in inner hand and narrow wing tipp looks more like an Accipiter.The pale crescent on the primaries looks different in a Red-shoukdered, it´s not a crescent in this bird.

Maybe the tail looks kind of short for an Accipiter, Cooper´s or Sharp-shinned, but that might be the angle, I said might be. If an Accipiter the square tail might suggest Sharp-shinned, a well fed one.
I like to see some more images before I can settle with the raptor.

JanJ
 
Well - there you go Larry, now we are in Accipiter camp, and it looks more like a Cooper´s Hawk. Any maore Larry?

JanJ
 
here's the last image I have. I didn't see any crescents when I was looking taking a photo of the bird.-I hadn't considered sharpie because it just seemed to big to me.-Of course my experience in identifying hawks in flight is limited or I wouldn't be asking in the first place.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_9851.JPG
    IMG_9851.JPG
    93 KB · Views: 99
It's interesting how a photo taken from one angle can be misleading.-I've had the same trouble this year when trying to identify hawks when I see them flying from a distance.-I haven't had the good fortune of being out on a day when a lot of hawks were passing through so that I can get some practice.-It's nice when there's a definitive field mark like black wing border and tail band of a broad-wing or the windows are clearly showing on a red-shouldered but sometimes those types of marks just aren't visible.

-Thanks to all for the input on this thread.
 
Last edited:
Sorry if I missed it but what is the consensus? I thought the tail looked a little bit roundish but I don't want to make a call on this one, but curious if a definite answer was made?

-Matt
 
The broad tail, large head, streaking limited to upper and mid breast signals Cooper´s.

But see these:

Note the tail shape:

http://www.pbase.com/joseph_kennedy_36/image/86760686

http://www.pbase.com/joseph_kennedy_36/image/86760695

http://www.pbase.com/joseph_kennedy_36/image/87276010

SSH:

http://www.pbase.com/joseph_kennedy_36/image/70330737

Note the Cooper´s like breast streaking, althoughthe white tipps to the tail feathers looks Sharp-shinned like.

http://www.pbase.com/joseph_kennedy_36/image/70330737

JanJ
 
Warning! This thread is more than 16 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top