• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Little Stint or Semipalmated Sandpiper (1 Viewer)

jimmmer

Well-known member
Hi Guys,
I would like your help with this bird which i saw on Monday December 04, on the south coast of Barbados. Is it a Stint or Semi?
 

Attachments

  • 20171204-IMG_0076.jpg
    20171204-IMG_0076.jpg
    859 KB · Views: 246
  • 20171204-IMG_0084.jpg
    20171204-IMG_0084.jpg
    732.9 KB · Views: 128
  • 20171204-IMG_0083.jpg
    20171204-IMG_0083.jpg
    523.2 KB · Views: 177
  • 20171204-IMG_0080.jpg
    20171204-IMG_0080.jpg
    673 KB · Views: 200
Stick my neck out without properly consulting references: I'd say stint for the following reasons. Semi should have a fatter-bellied more portly jizz than this; wings clearly extend well beyond tail; primaries well beyond tertials; some vague evidence of white "tram lines" down the back.
 
Semipalmated until unilaterally proven otherwise - for what would be an extraordinary 3rd ever record for all the West Indies (according to eBird data). Little Stint has only been seen from Barbados in April and May - in 1997 and 1999.
 
OK, after a bit more research, and in particular this :

https://www.google.co.uk/url?q=https://www.britishbirds.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/article_files/V77/V77_N07/V77_N07_P293_315_A085.pdf&sa=U&ved=0ahUKEwiZlP2XmfrXAhWPHsAKHdFpAKkQFggLMAA&usg=AOvVaw3lMo9G03MPL6OCgb94ertF

I now think it's probably an abnormal semi. The main thing in favour of the stint is wing length. Some us sites state this is an important diagnostic. On the other hand, the white tramlines are not as strong as classic little stint and there's no real sign of a split supercilium. The overall plumage tone lacks any rufous. The clincher probably _is_ the anchor shaped scaps (a quick look implied that either might have fully dark centred feathers but only semi the anchors). Sorry about that...
 
Warning! This thread is more than 6 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top