|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: York
Posts: 62
|
New carbon fibre tripod for Swaro ATS 80?
Hi All
Would be grateful for your thoughts. I want to buy a new CF tripod to use with my swaro ATS80 and ideally I don't want to use a base plate - I think this means using either the swaro head FH 101 or the Manfrotto 128RC. I will be digiscoping with my setup so want it to be stable and rugged. I have found the swaro legs and head "on offer" at £300, but would be grateful for any thoughts you may have on legs/heads combinations Regards
__________________
Mark UK & Irish List 220 Woodlark 220 |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: York
Posts: 62
|
anybody? please !?
__________________
Mark UK & Irish List 220 Woodlark 220 |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: London
Posts: 622
|
I have a similar Swaro and use the Velbon Sherpa Pro CF 635, which is excellent. Cost c £180 (including one of the cheaper Velbon heads) from South West Optics about 18 months to two years ago. Note that this is a tall tripod suitable for people of 5ft 10in or over but there are similar, shorter models.
Manf 128rc fits fine. I don't think Swaro heads and tripods are good value for money. Sean |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 16,474
|
The Velbon 635CF is very similar to the Swaro CF legs but a chunk cheaper so may be worth a look. Personally I'd go for a Manfrotto 128 everytime, it's a great bit of gear, coupled with the Velbon legs it should come in at ~£250-260.
|
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: York
Posts: 62
|
Thanks Sean and PostcardCV
I am 6ft 1 so height of tripod not a problem. I have seen the Swaro tripod and head for £300. What makes the Manfrotto head better in your opinion? I am planning to try both at some point but would be interested in what potential problems with either head I might encounter
__________________
Mark UK & Irish List 220 Woodlark 220 |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 16,474
|
I've used 128 heads for many years and have never had a problem with one. Most of the birds I know use this head - it is rock solid and has nice smooth movement, you can leave the pan loose and just lock off the tilt with a slight twist of the knob when needed. To me the Swaro head seems a bit over designed, too many bits to fiddle with in my opinion.
|
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#7 |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Salford England
Posts: 40,423
|
I use the Velbon 635. It is very light weight but very rigid. When I lost my first one I had no hesitation in replacing it with the same or similar. You might question if it is too light for scoing but that problem is easily solved with stacking it with weight, it should come with a bag which you can attach to add more weight if you wish. I haggled with price and got mine for £150 but I consider it a bargain at full price.
|
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
| Advertisement |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| lightweight carbon fibre tripod and head | horukuru | Tripod and Heads | 21 | Wednesday 16th April 2008 15:30 |
| Carbon fibre tripod: any ideas? | gmax | Photographic Tripods / Heads | 9 | Thursday 8th February 2007 06:56 |
| Aluminum or Carbon-fibre tripod? | James Eaton | Spotting Scopes & tripod/heads | 21 | Sunday 11th December 2005 13:56 |