|
Welcome, Guest. |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 2
|
Sigma 150 - 500 noise
I have the above lens and I am very happy with the results. The one thing I am not too sure about is the noise. Not digital noise but the noise the IS makes when it is on. Its a type of chattering and is far louder than the auto focus. Can any of you who have this lens confirm this is normal or should I look at returning it before it grinds to a halt. All the other lens I have with IS are Canon and very quite
Thanks |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Henry's loyal companion
|
Kayjay, it's normal for the Sigma. Apparently the Canon "IS" is a bit quieter. Not sure about the Nikon "VR". It took me by surprise the first time I used the 150-500, but I soon got used to it. FWIW I've stopped using OS while tripod mounted because it slows down the lock-on process by a half second, or so. It sure is a godsend when hand held near dusk or dawn, though.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 2
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 13
|
For Fowl Mouth, the OS should never be used when the lens is on a tripod according to sigma. I don't know why but it applies to all lenses with anti shake gizmos.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Henry's loyal companion
|
Thanks Malc1. It is true that it isn't recommended to use OS (or IS, or VR, etc...) while tripod mounted. I will retort, though, that despite what Sigma says, it actually works fine on a tripod by reducing virtually any residual shake, making the recommendation a curiosity to me (and many others, from what I have read elsewhere). My point is that if you have a tripod and can use proper long lens technique, you don't need to use the OS, and can speed up auto focus lock on time. Your observation might be valid, though. I could be missing something?
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: british columbia
Posts: 15,030
|
I think this is a bit strange too. I used my Canon 300 f2.8 IS (and my Sigma 150-500 OS) on tripod with IS on (mode 1) and can't see anything wrong with the image.
I won't bother it UNLESS with IS on when tripod mounted will cause damage to the IS mechanism. Perhaps the company should clarify it. |
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
| Advertisement |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Which Sigma Lens, Sigma 50-500 or 150-500 ? | Geoff Haynes | Sigma & Other Third Party Lenses | 2 | Friday 13th March 2009 21:39 |
| Sigma 1.4 DG Tele-converter on Sigma 150-500 OS Lens. | WHIMBREL | Sigma & Other Third Party Lenses | 2 | Friday 6th March 2009 17:14 |
| new sigma 150-500 lens | mark richards | Sigma & Other Third Party Lenses | 6 | Monday 20th October 2008 22:46 |
| Sigma 50-500 vs. 150-500 vs. Nikon 80-400 | Brookie | Nikon | 7 | Tuesday 1st July 2008 07:55 |