Welcome, Guest.
CLICK HERE TO REGISTER


Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old Wednesday 4th November 2009, 12:24   #1
kayjay200
Registered User

 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 2
Sigma 150 - 500 noise

I have the above lens and I am very happy with the results. The one thing I am not too sure about is the noise. Not digital noise but the noise the IS makes when it is on. Its a type of chattering and is far louder than the auto focus. Can any of you who have this lens confirm this is normal or should I look at returning it before it grinds to a halt. All the other lens I have with IS are Canon and very quite
Thanks

kayjay200 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 4th November 2009, 22:09   #2
Fowl Mouth
Henry's loyal companion
 
Fowl Mouth's Avatar

 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 2,794
Blog Entries: 7
Kayjay, it's normal for the Sigma. Apparently the Canon "IS" is a bit quieter. Not sure about the Nikon "VR". It took me by surprise the first time I used the 150-500, but I soon got used to it. FWIW I've stopped using OS while tripod mounted because it slows down the lock-on process by a half second, or so. It sure is a godsend when hand held near dusk or dawn, though.
__________________
Jason ®
birdsbyjason
Fowl Mouth is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Saturday 7th November 2009, 08:38   #3
kayjay200
Registered User

 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fowl Mouth View Post
Kayjay, it's normal for the Sigma. Apparently the Canon "IS" is a bit quieter. Not sure about the Nikon "VR". It took me by surprise the first time I used the 150-500, but I soon got used to it. FWIW I've stopped using OS while tripod mounted because it slows down the lock-on process by a half second, or so. It sure is a godsend when hand held near dusk or dawn, though.
Thanks for that, I thought it was normal, but just wanted some re assuarance. Yes I found out about the tripod stuff as well. Thanks again
kayjay200 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Saturday 14th November 2009, 22:15   #4
malc1
Registered User

 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 13
For Fowl Mouth, the OS should never be used when the lens is on a tripod according to sigma. I don't know why but it applies to all lenses with anti shake gizmos.
malc1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 16th November 2009, 03:17   #5
Fowl Mouth
Henry's loyal companion
 
Fowl Mouth's Avatar

 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 2,794
Blog Entries: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by malc1 View Post
For Fowl Mouth, the OS should never be used when the lens is on a tripod according to sigma. I don't know why but it applies to all lenses with anti shake gizmos.
Thanks Malc1. It is true that it isn't recommended to use OS (or IS, or VR, etc...) while tripod mounted. I will retort, though, that despite what Sigma says, it actually works fine on a tripod by reducing virtually any residual shake, making the recommendation a curiosity to me (and many others, from what I have read elsewhere). My point is that if you have a tripod and can use proper long lens technique, you don't need to use the OS, and can speed up auto focus lock on time. Your observation might be valid, though. I could be missing something?
__________________
Jason ®
birdsbyjason
Fowl Mouth is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 16th November 2009, 21:44   #6
eastwood
Registered User

 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: british columbia
Posts: 15,030
I think this is a bit strange too. I used my Canon 300 f2.8 IS (and my Sigma 150-500 OS) on tripod with IS on (mode 1) and can't see anything wrong with the image.
I won't bother it UNLESS with IS on when tripod mounted will cause damage to the IS mechanism. Perhaps the company should clarify it.
eastwood is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter BF Supporter 2007 BF Supporter 2008 BF Supporter 2009
Click here to Support BirdForum
Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Which Sigma Lens, Sigma 50-500 or 150-500 ? Geoff Haynes Sigma & Other Third Party Lenses 2 Friday 13th March 2009 21:39
Sigma 1.4 DG Tele-converter on Sigma 150-500 OS Lens. WHIMBREL Sigma & Other Third Party Lenses 2 Friday 6th March 2009 17:14
new sigma 150-500 lens mark richards Sigma & Other Third Party Lenses 6 Monday 20th October 2008 22:46
Sigma 50-500 vs. 150-500 vs. Nikon 80-400 Brookie Nikon 7 Tuesday 1st July 2008 07:55

{googleads}
Search the net with ask.com
Help support BirdForum
Ask.com and get

Page generated in 0.13045812 seconds with 18 queries
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:27.