• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Kestrel sp.? Greece (Santorini) May 2009 (1 Viewer)

MarcellC

Well-known member
;) just as I was about to post this, I saw a similar query about a bird in Egypt. I got these 3 photos whilst we stayed on Santorini during May 2009. At the time I ID'd the bird as Common Kestrel but now having a look again at the photos after cropping and making them lighter, I'm wondering if it's not a Lesser Kestrel.

The 1st photo does seem to show, faintly so might just be the light, a grey rump like a female LK. it does appear to have fairly strong facial marking though which don't appear on the next 2 photos - initially thought this photo was of the same bird in the following 2 shots. LARGE PHOTO

The photos of the Kestrel chasing the Hooded Crow (last 2 photos) was taken on a different day but same location. LARGE PHOTO #3 (#2 at it's largest)

Any ideas? (hope somebody can make out something from these fairly bad shots)

Cheers
Marcell
 

Attachments

  • 4370219494_896c0ac972.jpg
    4370219494_896c0ac972.jpg
    130.4 KB · Views: 114
  • 4370219496_71bfa0c012_o.jpg
    4370219496_71bfa0c012_o.jpg
    140.1 KB · Views: 117
  • 4370219498_d9db217a62.jpg
    4370219498_d9db217a62.jpg
    138.2 KB · Views: 135
Pics 1 and 3 show primaries 10 (front tip of wing) and 7 are similar in length. This is characteristic of Kestrel. In Lesser Kestrel, 7 is distinctly shorter than 10. But I'm often wrong so perhaps someone else will offer an opinion!
 
This looks like a fairly typical Common Kestrel to me - wing shape is spot on, moustache is strong and the underwing rather too well spotted for Lesser,
 
Warning! This thread is more than 14 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top