Join for FREE
It only takes a minute!

Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old Wednesday 29th June 2011, 18:21   #1
Vernon Barker
Registered User
 
Vernon Barker's Avatar

 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dronfield
Posts: 2,154
Photographing Red Kites

I am planning a trip to Gigrin farm to see the kites.

Which is the best hide and what lens is needed?


__________________
www.vernonbarkerphotography.com
Vernon Barker is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2010 2011 2012 2013
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Wednesday 29th June 2011, 19:50   #2
mdb2
Registered User

 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: hampshire
Posts: 264
HI, I went to Gigrin last winter, I waited for the snow, I chose the newest hide which is obviously the dearest, as well as being the highest. if my memory serves me well, it was about £15. The top level is fully open from about 4ft high. with a small covered section behind you to store your rucksack etc. I wanted to photograph in the snow for the reflection of light under their wings. Its a fair old trip from Hampshire so waited for the right conditions. Get there about an hour early and you will see them coming in for miles. The biggest problem is which kite to photograph. try to keep a level head and try to follow one around. hope this helps. I used a sigma 150-500 but a 400 will be ok. they are very close. mike

Last edited by mdb2 : Wednesday 29th June 2011 at 19:53.
mdb2 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 29th June 2011, 21:44   #3
johnf3f
johnf3f

 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: South Wales UK
Posts: 393
I have been to Gigrin Farm, though I normally go to Llandeusant (bit further for you) as it's cheaper and closer for me. I use a 1 series Canon + a 300 F4 IS. I have also used the 100-400 and 70-200 F2.8 IS with success. I would suggest you take both your 50D & 7D + 100-400 + 400 F5.6. You should have everything covered with these two lenses, you will find the 400 a bit long at times so have the 100-400 in reserve.
Good luck!
johnf3f is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 30th June 2011, 09:12   #4
Vernon Barker
Registered User
 
Vernon Barker's Avatar

 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dronfield
Posts: 2,154
Thanks very much for your advice. It looks like my 500 lens will be too big in this situation. Will take the 100-400 and the 400 prime.
__________________
www.vernonbarkerphotography.com
Vernon Barker is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2010 2011 2012 2013
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Thursday 7th July 2011, 18:42   #5
mike from ebbw
Registered User
 
mike from ebbw's Avatar

 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: S. WALES
Posts: 9,310
Personally I would take the 500mm too Vernon.The walk from the car to the hides isnt that far and you very often get birds on the ground that can be some distance from the hides.
__________________
My Website and Blog
http://mikewarburtonphotography.webs.com/
mike from ebbw is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Red Kites in SW James Thomas Birds & Birding 7 Tuesday 7th June 2011 22:20
red kites ian hamilton Northamptonshire 0 Wednesday 24th November 2010 20:58
red kites normanmc Information Wanted 0 Wednesday 25th November 2009 14:12
Red Kites Hummer Birds & Birding 6 Wednesday 18th January 2006 21:46
Red-shouldered hawk - nesting pair. PM if interested in photographing Terry O'Nolley Birds Of Prey 1 Wednesday 27th April 2005 21:29

{googleads}
Fatbirder's Top 1000 Birding Websites

Search the net with ask.com
Help support BirdForum
Ask.com and get

Page generated in 0.17108488 seconds with 16 queries
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:26.