|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: ashland oregon
Posts: 933
|
Not waterproof?
I've often used non waterproof compacts for many years but I was always super careful not to get them wet and have managed to do that quite well. Of course I just didn't get them out in rainy conditions or if I did it was just for a peak and then back under the coat or in a waterproof pack.
My question is based on ignorance from never having gotten a pair of these bins really wet. I was looking, longingly at the Bushnell 7x26 Elites and saw this in the description. The binocular also offers clarity in the foulest conditions thanks to the patented RainGuard HD coating, , a patented, permanent, water-repellant coating that causes moisture from rain, snow, sleet, and condensation to bead up and scatter less light. To my understanding these are not water or fog proof bins and so my question would be how wet can you get these guys without worry and what happens when you do get them really wet?
__________________
Beneath the civilized veneer, man remains the supreme predator. Cursed with what he believes is understanding, his true soul blossoms godlike in the heart of the nuclear inferno. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 1,449
|
Not tested the limit myself but as Sancho found out to his cost, even a damp pocket has the potential for problems.
http://www.birdforum.net/showthread....26#post2049941 Much as like them, I leave them at home on wet days. Not worth the risk. David |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Delaware
Posts: 973
|
If you search and look thru the forum and threads, you will see what other members have said and done about this problem.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: ashland oregon
Posts: 933
|
I found this thread http://www.birdforum.net/showthread....on+water+proof
Seems to be mixed opinions on the issue. Tropics or places like Alaska being especially problematic. It seems if bins get wet and you let them dry out every thing is usually ok as long as you don't give fungus a chance to grow. Would you say that is correct?
__________________
Beneath the civilized veneer, man remains the supreme predator. Cursed with what he believes is understanding, his true soul blossoms godlike in the heart of the nuclear inferno. |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Corvus brachyrhynchos watcher
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Lake Michigan Watershed
Posts: 941
|
Quote:
Yes, the waterproof/water-resistant/etc debate does continue... ![]() Here is what i have learned, mostly by reading. Anyone please feel free to correct me. 1. The only truly "waterproof" porro prisms are individual focus models. Source: bino repair folks who like porros, over on Cloudy Nights. 2. If you are using an instrument in the tropics, sub-tropics, or in wet weather conditions, you should consider the roof prism design. 3. Quality porro prisms that are central focus that are advertised as waterproof, or in some way, water-resistant, should be able to stand up to light drizzle for short periods, and moist air, in temperate zones. Some do use them in the tropics, but store them in drying boxes or such (somewhere on BF these have been described). 4. Fungus can be a problem in any bino that is not purged with nitrogen or argon etc., or was but has broken seals, if used or stored in moist conditions. What do i do? I am in the temperate zone. I usually take the Nikon 8x32 SE spring/summer/fall, unless it is raining or rain is a high probability. Then, and in winter also, I use a roof.
__________________
"If there is a heaven, and i am allowed entrance, I will ask for no more than an endless living world to walk through and explore. I will carry with me an inexhaustible supply of notebooks from which i can send back reports to the more sedentary spirits." E.O. Wilson Last edited by jaymoynihan : Thursday 19th January 2012 at 19:04. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: ashland oregon
Posts: 933
|
Thanks. I'm going to play it safe I guess although that's likely being a bit paranoid. But then I don't worry and that's worth it even if over kill. Almost everything I own but my old bins are WP now but there's still a few non WP that are tempting me. In about 40 years of owning I've never had a problem but I worried about them and that's not worth any savings to me now.
__________________
Beneath the civilized veneer, man remains the supreme predator. Cursed with what he believes is understanding, his true soul blossoms godlike in the heart of the nuclear inferno. |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Lawrence, Kansas, USA
Posts: 1,702
|
Quote:
--AP |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Corvus brachyrhynchos watcher
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Lake Michigan Watershed
Posts: 941
|
Quote:
__________________
"If there is a heaven, and i am allowed entrance, I will ask for no more than an endless living world to walk through and explore. I will carry with me an inexhaustible supply of notebooks from which i can send back reports to the more sedentary spirits." E.O. Wilson |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 625
|
I could be wrong, but I think the the Opticron, Leupold and Minox internal focus Porro's are waterproof. Frank or John Dracon would probably know for sure.
Bruce Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Eastern Pennsylvania
Posts: 6,426
|
Porros with movable oculars like the Nikon Action, Bushnell Legend, etc... and that are advertised as waterproof utilize rubber o-ring type seals to prevent water from entering. I don't know if they are actually submersible but I doubt they would be affected in a light to moderate rainstorm.
Coincidentally, it is these rubber o-rings that cause a bit of the focusing stiffness on these models. The internal focus porros such as the Minox BD BP, Opticron HR WP, Leupold Cascade, etc.... are as waterproof as their roof prism counterparts.
__________________
One thing to note when reading these forums is to make sure and "filter" the reviews through the prism of knowledge that we are a bunch of OCD nutcases who hyperanalyze any minute differences in order to have stuff to talk about here.... Eitanaltman |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 334
|
I have had Ultravids out in the worst of conditions and they are sealed tight - no problems.
I do own a pair of Pentax waterproof bins that went for a 10 min swim on a canoe adventure when the dog leaned over one side to get a better look at a Canada goose. They developed some condensation on a lens on one side. Pentax either replaced or repaired for free quickly (excellent warranty). Prior to that I had the Pentax's out in rain, snow, fog, temperature changes, mist etc. without a problem. Birding in the rain is not one of my favorite things to do. But I do it. I make every attempt to use the rain guards and only remove them when the bins are horizontal to avoid wetting the glass. I don't violate that rule more than 10 times a day. The hydrophobic coatings help but I dont always get a clean shake. After a wrist snap shake its not like the bins are restored to no rain viewing. But they are improved. Is there a trick to getting a clean shake? I may start a thread on that topic. But I am very thankful new bins are less likely to get wet in mist, spray, rain, and fog and temperature change condensation. Last edited by Tvc15_2000 : Sunday 22nd January 2012 at 00:50. |
|
|
| Advertisement |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Got a non-waterproof scope? | stevetb | Spotting Scopes & tripod/heads | 4 | Tuesday 9th February 2010 09:25 |
| Waterproof boots? | spartacus mills | Outdoor Clothing | 46 | Wednesday 12th August 2009 17:50 |
| Waterproof | Simon HB9DRV | Canon | 7 | Friday 2nd June 2006 12:37 |
| waterproof trousers? | matt green | Outdoor Clothing | 6 | Wednesday 24th May 2006 10:37 |
| Waterproof SE | Atomic Chicken | Nikon | 4 | Tuesday 1st June 2004 11:45 |