|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
|
|
#176 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Location: hamburg
Posts: 996
|
Roy,
sorry my fault since my question was mistakable. I'd like to add the species name with the camera just after taken the photo while on the tour as long as the expert or guide could tell me the needed information. Steve |
|
|
|
|
#177 |
|
Mike Powell
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Nottingham, England
Posts: 3,430
|
You could try shooting a few seconds of video and speak the name of the species as you record.
Mike |
|
|
|
|
#178 |
|
Robert L Jarvis
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Burnley, Lancashire
Posts: 5,619
|
Hi Steve
It would be easier to add a title or caption when processing the image or editing the video. It cannot be done when you are taking a still but you can do a voice over when you are videoing. Problem is make sure you have the video settled, no wobbling or zooming when you speak because when you come to edit this part it may end up on the cutting room floor.
__________________
I now have my own website at www.robertljarvisimages.zenfolio.com. New photos and videos regularly uploaded to view. Great Crested Grebe video now added. |
|
|
|
|
#179 |
|
Registered User
|
I haven't had much opportunity to do much birding recently but I've been taking the kids to a lot of museums recently. I continue to be very impressed by the SX40's ability to take photos without a flash in a museum or in dark areas. Not much zoom of course but not needed.
Here's a model of a ship taken from about 3 feet away inside a museum. And a photo from down in the lower deck of a 200+ year old sailing ship the USS Constitution. |
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#180 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Chepstow
Posts: 44
|
I compared the Canon SX40 and the Nikon P510 head to head at a local store at full zoom. The P510 was smaller and easier in the hand. The additional zoom power of the P510 was suprisingly apparent in the few test shots I took.
I could not judge image quality based on looking at the lcd screen since the Nikon display has considerably more pixels. I did form the impression that the auto focus of the Canon was quicker and more reliable than that of the P510 but perhaps that was down to my handling. Ultimately, I have opted for the SX40. I know that I will be aquiring a camera which many users are very satisfied with. I have also seen plenty of bird pictures and video which suggest that it will not dissapoint. I use a Canon ixus 300 HS for digiscoping which uses the same back lighing technology as the SX40. Although I liked the look and feel of the P510, I was not prepared to take a punt on a product which has received remarkably little interest from BF users considering the fact that it has such a powerful zoom. |
|
|
|
|
#181 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: poole
Posts: 22
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#182 |
|
Gallery Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NE England
Posts: 27,501
|
Just in case you may still be thinking about buying a Cannon SX40HS
The todays special value on QVC UK [shopping channel] is the Cannon Powershot SX40HS for £311.88 or 3 instalments of £103.96. This is until midnight tonight or until it sells out. With QVC you can use it for up to 30 days and if you dont like it you send it back to them and get your money refunded apart from the postage. Here is a link http://www.qvcuk.com/ukqic/qvcapp.as....KeywordSearch NB the price has now gone up to £377.50 as it only is Todays special value for one day only, then after that is its normal selling price.
__________________
Marmot Avatar by Birdforum Member - Pavlik Last edited by Marmot : Sunday 6th May 2012 at 06:25. |
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#183 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: poole
Posts: 22
|
I have tried out one or two cameras from QVC and sent them back because they werent what i was looking for , ive now got the SX40 which is just what i was looking for , i bought mine for £309.99 so the QVC price is very good especially since you can use it , put it through its paces , and even pay for it in 3 easy payments , NO BRAINER !!
|
|
|
|
|
#184 |
|
Occasional bird snapper
|
The QVC price is very competitive as according to 'Camera Price buster' apart from Pixmania (£302) the cheapest UK price is Amazon at £317 post paid.
|
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#185 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Little Aston
Posts: 506
|
4 gig card included as well - I am tempted, but the wife isn't
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#186 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: barnsley
Posts: 929
|
|
|
|
|
|
#187 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Little Aston
Posts: 506
|
Married 32 years and she will get a good pension - I will get nowt, so going to stick with her for the time being I reckon.
I still might sneakily get the camera and have it delivered elsewhere. hehe Last edited by punta : Saturday 5th May 2012 at 18:26. |
|
|
|
|
#188 |
|
Just call me Tim
|
There is 5% cash back (not guaranteed, but likely) if you purchase online from QVC via the TopCashBack website. You need to be a TopCashBack member, which is free to join. I've been with them for 2-3 years and have received £300 in cash back to date.
__________________
"Tim" |
|
|
|
|
#189 |
|
Gallery Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NE England
Posts: 27,501
|
It always worth checking out QVC for cameras, they seem to have them as a TSV about every 6 weeks and always seems to be on a Saturday as well.
They had the Fuji HS30 as TSV in March when they were selling it for £359.
__________________
Marmot Avatar by Birdforum Member - Pavlik |
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#190 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: poole
Posts: 22
|
Walking around this morning , noticed loads of young swallow flying around , this one was having a rest , it was about 20-30 feet away , i zoomed in on it this is the result , no photo shopping just cropped , not bad eh ? this Sx40 is a great camera .
Last edited by woody66 : Sunday 6th May 2012 at 13:34. |
|
|
|
|
#191 | |
|
Occasional bird snapper
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#192 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: poole
Posts: 22
|
Ha ha , believe me i tried , so i took the easy route and waited till one rested .
|
|
|
|
|
#193 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Hong Kong (ex Sydney)
Posts: 9,087
|
I had the SX40HS around my neck on a trip to the wetlands last week and grabbed these two shots.
The main advantage of the SX40HS over the Nikons is the Image Stabilisation. In the Canon it's excellent , in the Nikon it doesn't work as intended. It's amazing with the SX40 to hand hold at 840 mm and shoot a video and it's rock steady. With the Nikon I have to shoot it on a tripod. Neil |
|
|
|
|
#194 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 414
|
Quote:
So I did some research and found this thread, and then found a "used" model offered by LCE. It arrived two days ago, and I've been busy getting to understand how a Super Zoom Compact works. I've been very pleased with some of my results, (hand held at max zoom) and less so with the unfamiliar interface, which I'm gradually getting to understand. I've also tried the video and on general subjects, such as wind blown foliage, and ripples on the local pond, it's OK. However, it's quite disappointing on fast trains, and to my surprise, even slow moving canal boats show jitter - I'll stick to my camcorders for those sorts of subject. I'll give it more testing this next few days, as I'm off to Norfolk & Suffolk, and hope to visit some bird reserves.
__________________
- - - - - - - - - Malcolm Stewart Milton Keynes, UK |
|
|
|
|
|
#195 |
|
Occasional bird snapper
|
I will be interested on what you think of it when using in the field Malcolm. BTW the 840mm includes (and is calculated by) the crop factor of the Camera so using a Canon 800/5.6 on your 50D would give you 1280mm reach when calculated in the same way (mind you the SX40 is even cheaper than a MKIII converter let alone the price of DSLR telephoto lenses).
|
|
|
Click here to Support BirdForum |
|
|
#196 |
|
Robert L Jarvis
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Burnley, Lancashire
Posts: 5,619
|
Hi Malcolm
I did report some posts way back that video on the SX40 could not handle fast moving objects, they became blurs. Also this is not a fault, it is a failing recognised by Canon and is mentioned in the Sx40 manual. I do not think the Panasonic FZ150 has this problem. If the subjects are slow moving or still the video is excellent. I rather think this may be something to do with the sensor used and may be fixed on the next incarnation of the SX40. Robert
__________________
I now have my own website at www.robertljarvisimages.zenfolio.com. New photos and videos regularly uploaded to view. Great Crested Grebe video now added. |
|
|
|
|
#197 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: poole
Posts: 22
|
Wow , beautiful birdshot neil , well done .
|
|
|
|
|
#198 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Location: hamburg
Posts: 996
|
What I don't like with this camera is the flimsy small plastic wheel at the back one has to use for manual focussing. It's not easy to avoid accidental pressing of one of the four positions for other functions this wheel has.
Steve |
|
|
|
|
#199 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 414
|
Quote:
I've also included a screen capture showing that the angles of view are very similar. Of course, what is different is the depth of field, shown very clearly in the foliage behind the chimney. What is puzzling is that both shots show similar sharpness at the 100% pixels level, and I'm now wondering what magic Canon have incorporated into the lens of the SX40 HS so that fluorite elements aren't needed! (Or perhaps ED/UD glass has now been improved to quite a high level...?) I'm still struggling with the "strange-to-me" camera interface, and I'll be surprised if I can do half-decent birds-in-flight with the SX40. But others do quite well, so there's a new challenge.
__________________
- - - - - - - - - Malcolm Stewart Milton Keynes, UK |
|
|
|
|
|
#200 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wherever I lay my hat...
Posts: 167
|
Quote:
I'm no expert, but I can't really see why the Nikon's appear to have fallen by the wayside. Seriously, the attached images were all taken with a P500, hand held using full zoom and I am more than happy with the results. Take a good look and tell me where Nikon are going wrong? AndyM |
|
|
|
| Advertisement |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| which compact super-zoom? | Amarillo | Panasonic | 14 | Thursday 10th December 2009 11:17 |
| Canon SX1 IS Super Zoom | RJM | Canon | 32 | Monday 24th August 2009 20:55 |
| New Super Zoom. When? | Saxdude | Panasonic | 2 | Tuesday 9th June 2009 19:08 |
| Super Zoom-when is it available ? | David Smith | Olympus | 8 | Thursday 15th February 2007 13:53 |
| Super Super Zoom | Alan G | Olympus | 17 | Saturday 27th January 2007 12:24 |