That'll be a no then, I'm guessing.
If you accept these data,
lineatus is very, very close to
M. m. govinda, which is usually kept in
M. migrans.
(It's not completely clear from the paper itself, but the bird labelled "BK (India)" in Fig.2, that clusters with the "BK (Japan)" -- this one can only be a
lineatus based on range -- corresponds to a sequence identified as
govinda in GenBank; the second Indian bird is ID'd as a
lineatus in GenBank; the Pakistan bird is said there to be a
govinda -- thus the two taxa would not even appear to have reciprocally monophyletic mtDNA... That said, I'd prefer to see more
govinda data before to regard this as proven. Here they had only two specimens, both collected in winter, at localities where
lineatus is also possible at this time of the year. They don't really make it clear why these could not have
been lineatus as well.)
The
lineatus/govinda group is then closer to Australian
M. m. affinis than the latter is to
M. m. migrans -- thus if you want to make a split, either
affinis should be a distinct species as well, or it should be included in
M. lineatus.
L -