Join for FREE
It only takes a minute!
Magnifying the passion for nature. Zeiss Victory Harpia 95. New!

Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old Tuesday 20th September 2016, 07:54   #1
Telephoto Paul
Registered User
 
Telephoto Paul's Avatar

 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 276
Sigma 500mm F4

Sigma have announced a 500mm f4 due for releases Oct/Nov. RRP is $6k so about 2/3rd of Canikon equivalents. Given they seem to have raised their optics game lately, it'll be interesting to see how it performs. Autofocus performance (esp. consistency) and weight (Canon did a very good job last time around) will I think be the challenge.
Telephoto Paul is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 22nd September 2016, 03:47   #2
Fowl Mouth
Just a guy with dogs
 
Fowl Mouth's Avatar

 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 6,161
Blog Entries: 9
I think the last iteration of the 500 4.5 priced itself out of the market. $5k USD for f4.5 is really pushing it. I own that lens, but the pre DG version. I picked it up used last year, so for me the price I paid was well worth the performance. Back to topic, only $1k more for a full f4, plus OS...not bad. I have high hopes for this proper 500. I won't be upgrading because I have way too many financial commitments these days. But I quietly always route for Siggy. Nice to see this is FINALLY here.
Fowl Mouth is offline  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2010 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Old Thursday 22nd September 2016, 07:18   #3
Chosun Juan
Given to Fly
 
Chosun Juan's Avatar

 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Central West NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,110
Question

Proper 500mm f4, $6K, 380mm long, 3310grams, hmmmm .....

Close enough weight wise, yet not as expensive as the CaNikons, to be a consideration ??? Wonder if the iq and AF will be comparable ?? .......


Chosun
Chosun Juan is offline  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2016 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Old Thursday 22nd September 2016, 08:25   #4
Vespobuteo
Registered User

 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Utopia
Posts: 1,673
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o936Z2bk-P0

Nikon version has the electro magnetic shutter,

Price (6499 ) will be about the same as the previous (pre-FL) Nikon 500/4 VR.
Vespobuteo is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 22nd September 2016, 18:00   #5
Frank Anderson
Registered User

 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Tyneside
Posts: 102
I've always felt the Canon 500mm was priced well out of my reach and not a justifiable expense. Although this is still expensive it could be in reach and once second hand copies start coming onto the market, who knows.

If the 500 f4.5 is anything to go by, then this one shouldn't be far of the Canon/Nikon equivalents in quality.
Frank Anderson is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Saturday 24th September 2016, 15:29   #6
seaspirit
Registered User

 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 439
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vespobuteo View Post

Nikon version has the electro magnetic shutter,
.
Aperture, shutters are in mostly found in camera bodies .......

What it will offer, that non of the other big name primes has to offer is the USB-port to fine-tune lens performance to a camera body and shooting scenario, and to update firmware without sending gear in for service.
seaspirit is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Tuesday 22nd November 2016, 10:10   #7
Telephoto Paul
Registered User
 
Telephoto Paul's Avatar

 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 276
Park Cameras have a Nikon-mount copy in stock and for sale. Price is 6000, compared to 8000 for Nikon's own, and 7500 for Canon's.
Telephoto Paul is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 23rd November 2016, 05:41   #8
Chosun Juan
Given to Fly
 
Chosun Juan's Avatar

 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Central West NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,110
Quote:
Originally Posted by Telephoto Paul View Post
Park Cameras have a Nikon-mount copy in stock and for sale. Price is 6000, compared to 8000 for Nikon's own, and 7500 for Canon's.
Priced too close for comfort in making a truly compelling argument as an alternative given the roughly 10% extra weight it carries? ..... I had hoped for keener pricing than that .....


Chosun
Chosun Juan is offline  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2016 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Old Wednesday 23rd November 2016, 08:53   #9
Vespobuteo
Registered User

 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Utopia
Posts: 1,673
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chosun Juan View Post
Priced too close for comfort in making a truly compelling argument as an alternative given the roughly 10% extra weight it carries? ..... I had hoped for keener pricing than that .....


Chosun
You could always want a lower price...expected perhaps a bit lower price also
but the price difference mentioned above is not quite valid around here,
I guess exchange rates may be the reason.
Here the sigma is close to being half the price of the nikon 500 FL VR,
(60 vs 110 SEK).

Sigma IQ and quality have been improved compared to 10-15 years ago.
Will be interesting to see reviews.
Vespobuteo is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 28th April 2017, 22:45   #10
Vespobuteo
Registered User

 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Utopia
Posts: 1,673
The 500/4 Sigma gets a very good review result here:

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/R...orts-Lens.aspx

Don't see much difference from the Canon 500/4 IS USM II, but the Sigma have less CA.
It's only a 21 MP cam of FF though:

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/R...mp=0&APIComp=0

Another positive review, with some samples, bokeh looks good to:

http://natuurfotografie.nl/review-si...-os-hsm-sport/

Another comparison Nikon 500/4 vs Sigma 500/4. Autofocus speed seem to be competitive in the Sigma
and the Nikon-version of the Sigma have a Electromagnetic Diaphragm (which the Canon version does NOT have):

http://www.naturalart.ca/voice/blog.html#500mm_wars_4

A lot of reading there, but the short summary is that he finally decided on the Sigma.

Last edited by Vespobuteo : Saturday 29th April 2017 at 22:27.
Vespobuteo is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 18th September 2017, 12:19   #11
Mzungu
Ken Doy
 
Mzungu's Avatar

 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Wellington Point QLD
Posts: 15,377
Have been using the Sigma 500 mm f/4 for a couple of months now along with the Nikon D500 and can't fault the lens in any situation , most of the time used handheld which even at 70 yrs of age is fine . Also occasionally used with the Sigma TC-1401 ( on tripod ) with excellent results and very little difference in focus speed .
__________________
" We are not wholly bad or good.
Who live our lives under Milk Wood "
Dylan Thomas
Mzungu is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 7th December 2017, 23:44   #12
mr_birdman
Canon snob
 
mr_birdman's Avatar

 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 274
I have been offered this lens by Sigma in Sydney, Australia for a weekend's testing over the next weekend (15-17 December). If the deal goes ahead, I will be writing my thorough user review.

There are at least two credible reviews out there I have read that have given it an extremely good rating, on par with the exxy Canon and Nikon 500/4 super teles. However, no one tested it with a 2x converter. That is my only gripe. There are two reasons for that gripe:

1) My current Canon EF500mm f/4L IS USM (series 1) takes the EF 2x MkII very well and if used properly I am capable of capturing very good quality images, even hand held - albeit I need to close the aperture down to f/10 or f/11. Now, I can even put an EF 1.4x MkII converter on to stack the two together (2x + 1.4) for a 1,400mm f/11 lens and I am capable of taking very good images that are of publication worthy quality (I stop down to f/16 though) under the right conditions using my tripod (for 1,400mm I do use a tripod, but hand hold mostly in other instances). So the Sigma has to deliver good IQ at 1,000mm.

2) Will the Sigma 500mm f/4 DG OS HSM be as good wide open with the 2x as the Canon EF 500mm f/4L IS II USM with the EF 2x MkIII? The Canon has superb edge-to-edge image quality at f/8, thus I would not need to stop down to f/10 or f/11 whilst using this set-up. If Sigma is a match at least at the 1,000mm f/8 mark with the Canon EF 500mm f/4L IS II USM then I am sold! If not, I will pay the AUD 11,500 for a new 500/4 from Canon.
__________________
FACEBOOK

Last edited by mr_birdman : Thursday 7th December 2017 at 23:46.
mr_birdman is offline  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2011 2017 2018 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Old Friday 8th December 2017, 00:04   #13
mr_birdman
Canon snob
 
mr_birdman's Avatar

 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 274
Also, here is another very very positive review from E.J. Peiker at Naturescapes:
https://www.naturescapes.net/article...t-lens-review/

Pricing probably varies globally.

The Canon 500 is around AUD 11,000 to 12,000
The Nikon, I have no clue. I would say about a grand more.
The Sigma, I can buy for just over AUD 6,000 so it is a huge saving and I may need to drop my Canon Snob title if I go with a Sigma. As long as it is as good as a Canon, because for me image quality is more important than a cost saving. Even if it's half the price of the Canon equivalent. I guess I could always get a used Canon 500 II in which case, they are around the 8-9K mark.

It would be an honour to endorse a third-party product over the ridiculously priced Canon lens, provided the Sigma is an ass-kicker.
__________________
FACEBOOK

Last edited by mr_birdman : Friday 8th December 2017 at 00:08.
mr_birdman is offline  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2011 2017 2018 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Old Friday 8th December 2017, 06:46   #14
Neil G.
Registered User

 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: coombe martin
Posts: 760
Looking forward to your review......hope it works for you.As you say,canon and nikons big telephoto lenses are ridiculously priced and unjustifiable.
Neil G. is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 8th December 2017, 21:23   #15
Stephen Mark
Registered User

 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: New Bern NC
Posts: 314
Look at the blog on Brad Hills "Natural Are Images" He did a very in depth test of the Sigma against the new Nikon and he kept the Sigma. He leds small group Photo tours thru some wild country in British Columbia and the Yukon. Good read
Steve
Stephen Mark is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Saturday 9th December 2017, 11:12   #16
mr_birdman
Canon snob
 
mr_birdman's Avatar

 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 274
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Mark View Post
Look at the blog on Brad Hills "Natural Are Images" He did a very in depth test of the Sigma against the new Nikon and he kept the Sigma. He leds small group Photo tours thru some wild country in British Columbia and the Yukon. Good read
Steve
I read that review too. Very good read and great to see Sigma picking up their game.
__________________
FACEBOOK
mr_birdman is offline  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2011 2017 2018 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Old Sunday 10th December 2017, 09:16   #17
Neil G.
Registered User

 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: coombe martin
Posts: 760
Seriously,how much better would the image quality be compared to my nikon 200-500 mm used close to its longest focal length......i use mine at about 480mm most of the time.Can someone who owns one post some pics up here.......the sample images ive looked at so far,although great,dont seem to be any more sharp than the results i get from my lens.......certainly not an extra 4000's worth.
Neil G. is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 10th December 2017, 12:35   #18
Stephen Mark
Registered User

 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: New Bern NC
Posts: 314
Neil
Find DP Review's website and in the Third Party Lens forum. There have been several threads with pictures and links to other galleries with this lens. Yes when you pixel peep at 100% there is a difference plus you get better low light and auto-focus performance.
Steve
Stephen Mark is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 10th December 2017, 21:04   #19
mr_birdman
Canon snob
 
mr_birdman's Avatar

 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 274
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil G. View Post
Seriously,how much better would the image quality be compared to my nikon 200-500 mm used close to its longest focal length......i use mine at about 480mm most of the time.Can someone who owns one post some pics up here.......the sample images ive looked at so far,although great,dont seem to be any more sharp than the results i get from my lens.......certainly not an extra 4000's worth.
People have different needs when it comes to equipment. If your need is met by the 200-500 then that is great.
__________________
FACEBOOK
mr_birdman is offline  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2011 2017 2018 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Canon 500mm vs 100-400mm vs Sigma 150-500mm frinky Canon 9 Tuesday 4th September 2012 19:56
Tamron 200-500mm vs. Sigma 50-500mm DG JSI Sigma & Other Third Party Lenses 30 Monday 19th January 2009 09:07
Tamron 200-500mm vs. sigma 170-500mm shutterflyd50 Nikon 27 Thursday 15th January 2009 19:45

{googleads}

Fatbirder's Top 1000 Birding Websites

Help support BirdForum

Page generated in 0.20567799 seconds with 30 queries
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:39.