paperweight
Well-known member
I own the Fuji X-100 black limited and shoot throught the Kowa 883 (20-60x eyepiece) with the DA 4/DA 10 adapters attached.
So far, I love the results. You can see them in the gallery section. Whenever I go 20x, I will have to select spot vs internal ae, and I will always have to work on the result, crop it to 50% or even 100%.
I shoot RAW and develop with Silky Pix, the software that came with the camera.
These are my questions:
The X-100 has a larger sensor the the RX-100 m2/m3 and shows more detail and image quality. What will I gain when I use the RX-100 and do not crop compared to the X-100? Is there really any gain or rather a loss in image quality?
If I go for the RX-100: I could get a package including the RX-100 M2 plus the electronic viewfinder EV1MK plus spare batteries and external charger (all Sony). This package is 6-months old and will cost me 600 EUR compared to the 800 EUR for the RX-100 m3. Are the better viewfinder, the hot shoe for external flash and the jack for an external microphone arguments for the m2 that weigh more than the new lens and the improved video resolution of the m3?
When I put the black cloth over my head, I will surely need a good viewfinder to go along my varifocal glasses.
So first decision will be RX-100 yes or no, and, if yes, m2 with EV1KM or rather m3?
Thanks a lot for taking your time to read all this and your help in my decision.
So far, I love the results. You can see them in the gallery section. Whenever I go 20x, I will have to select spot vs internal ae, and I will always have to work on the result, crop it to 50% or even 100%.
I shoot RAW and develop with Silky Pix, the software that came with the camera.
These are my questions:
The X-100 has a larger sensor the the RX-100 m2/m3 and shows more detail and image quality. What will I gain when I use the RX-100 and do not crop compared to the X-100? Is there really any gain or rather a loss in image quality?
If I go for the RX-100: I could get a package including the RX-100 M2 plus the electronic viewfinder EV1MK plus spare batteries and external charger (all Sony). This package is 6-months old and will cost me 600 EUR compared to the 800 EUR for the RX-100 m3. Are the better viewfinder, the hot shoe for external flash and the jack for an external microphone arguments for the m2 that weigh more than the new lens and the improved video resolution of the m3?
When I put the black cloth over my head, I will surely need a good viewfinder to go along my varifocal glasses.
So first decision will be RX-100 yes or no, and, if yes, m2 with EV1KM or rather m3?
Thanks a lot for taking your time to read all this and your help in my decision.