• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Unidentified birds (1 Viewer)

Mike Tom

Well-known member
The first I think is a common sandpiper by the very white underbelly and plain brown back. I did think a greenshank but I am sure these have more spots. This was in La Palma in Feb 16. The others were in the Norfolk Broads last month. The second , I only know two waders with red legs, a ruff and a redshank, so I think a redshank as the back again is plain. The third is a black tailed godwit. The 4th I am assuming is a BTG also, maybe a juvenile as its underbelly is so white ?
 

Attachments

  • DSCF5915.jpg
    DSCF5915.jpg
    93.5 KB · Views: 88
  • DSCF3267.jpg
    DSCF3267.jpg
    48.9 KB · Views: 76
  • DSCF3262.jpg
    DSCF3262.jpg
    43.9 KB · Views: 72
  • DSCF3273.jpg
    DSCF3273.jpg
    39.8 KB · Views: 70
Getting there Mike.
For the Common Sandpiper look for the white patch at the joint of the wing and the neck.
The first Godwit is still in breeding plumage while the second was either a non-breeder or has already moulted into winter plumage. At this time of year you will often find waders in a range of plumages from full breeding to full winter all in the same flock. Adds to the 'interest'!
Mick
 
Getting there Mike.
For the Common Sandpiper look for the white patch at the joint of the wing and the neck.
The first Godwit is still in breeding plumage while the second was either a non-breeder or has already moulted into winter plumage. At this time of year you will often find waders in a range of plumages from full breeding to full winter all in the same flock. Adds to the 'interest'!
Mick


Thank you, the differing plumages certainly make for more thought ! Nice to see progress
 
Warning! This thread is more than 7 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top