• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Why two objective lenses? (1 Viewer)

JabaliHunter

Well-known member
Seeing Swarovski launch their latest BTX eyepiece module for their telescopes made me wonder why binoculars are made with two objective lenses? A single objective lens could be larger, yet combined with two eyepieces or ease of viewing. Might this be a way of addressing some of the weaknesses in optical performance, which as has been pointed out before, mostly fail to match the optical performance of some of the best low power telescopes?

Just curious...
 

Attachments

  • Swaro BTX.jpg
    Swaro BTX.jpg
    9.9 KB · Views: 73
Interesting idea but it introduces its own challenges. You need a beam splitter to send the image to two eyeypieces (no doubt with its own array of optical problems) and then there is the issue of providing a sufficiently wide (I mean a wide span from min to max) IPD adjustment. And all while keeping the weight down. Handling would be a bit marmite depending on where the focus was positioned. Close focus would be good though since there would be no cross-eyed effect.

Lee
 
Last edited:
The two binocular objectives are looking through two slightly different and rapidly-changing columns of air. This allows the brain to use an averaging factor to improve visual acuities.

One might say the problem is alleviated by using only one objective. But, as Lee points out, having only one objective introduces other avenues for problems to arise, not the least of which is alignment for the two lines of sight—especially as the IPD is changed. If one will visit sites dedicated to those beam-splitting arrangements, it will soon become clear that collimation issues is more pronounced than with binoculars in general. Most people see problems in observing as being related to an instrument. In reality, they relate as much to, usually not considered, physiological conditions.

Just a thought.

Bill
 
Binomania has a recent comparison of the new Swaro. binoviewer with the Kowa Highlander
and the Docter Aspectem.

Read the review. The Swaro. is very good, but not in some ways to the big twin binoculars.

The advantage would be to scope users who pack and carry things to a site. I suppose more
tests are upcoming on how the viewer compares to the single eyepieces.

In my experience 2 eyes are better than one, in many ways.

Recently, I find I like 15-16 X binoculars better than a spotter, in many ways.

Jerry
 
Warning! This thread is more than 7 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top