• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Sir Peter Scott oil painting (1 Viewer)

Hi all-
My name is Frank Monkiewicz and I am a photographer in Boston, MA. When my father died a few years ago, he gave me a painting done by Peter Scott, the son of the explorer Robert Falcon Scott. It is a painting of a pheasant walking through the woods. It is signed by Peter Scott and dated 1935. He gave it as a wedding present to Maribel Vinson Owen in about 1940 who was a ice figure skater from the USA. My father bought their house back in 1964 after their whole family and the entire 1963 US Olympic team perished in an airplane crash in 1963 over Brussels.
I am thinking about selling the painting and was wondering what it is worth?
I know that Scott was a well known painter of wildlife in England and that he was a founder of a wildelife refuge in England.
If anyone is interested, let me know and I can send a photo of the painting to you. I have some written text with the painting and know the complete history of how it came from England to the USA in the 1940's.
Cheers-
Frank
 
Hi Frank,

A warm welcome to BirdForum from all the Moderators and Admin :t:

It would be nice if you could attach a photo. As to the value, I guess a specialist dealer would be the best place to get an estimate.
 
Hi Frank,

Is the Peter Scott painting still available as I am interested in it? If so, please could you send me a photograph. My email address is grahamhonour 'at' aol.com

Many thanks,

Graham
 
Quite a tragic story, Frank. And an original by Sir Peter S would of course fetch a lot of money, and that's as precise as I'm qualified to go!
 
Warning! This thread is more than 16 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top