• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Northern Harrier Taxonomy Question (1 Viewer)

YourBirdOasis

Well-known member
I'm curious what people's opinions are regarding whether Circus cyaneus cyaneaus and C. c. hudsonius should be split and recognized as two separate species?
 
Ferguson-Lees & Christie 2001

Raptors of the World:
[Hen Harrier] Often treated as conspecific with Northern Harrier, but adults of latter are intermediate in various respects between Palearctic Hen Harrier and Neotropical Cinereous Harrier, and juveniles of Hen differ markedly from those of American forms. All three are geographically isolated and could be considered distinct races of one species, or three species forming a superspecies, which is the course followed here...

It is more customary to regard the Holarctic pair as one species and cinereus as another that is 'perhaps conspecific' (Amadon & Bull 1988). They are similar in structure and habits, and largely confined to temperate and cold climates (Nieboer 1973), but, with geographical isolation, have developed significant plumage differences. In a number of ways, hudsonius is more like cinereus than like cyaneus: for example, the males of both New World forms are closer to each other than to cyaneus in having less extensive black on the tips of the outer five primaries, more tail-barring, and rufous or blackish markings on the white underbody and wing-linings; females and immatures are also more clearly distinct from each other in the American forms.

I suspect that many British and Irish listers now favour a split of hudsonius...

Richard
 
Last edited:
Dobson & Clarke 2011

Dobson & Clarke 2011. Inconsistency in the taxonomy of Hen and Northern Harriers: causes and consequences. British Birds 104(4): 192-201.
Abstract
The Hen Harrier Circus c. cyaneus and Northern Harrier C. cyaneus hudsonius are classified as conspecifics by some modern authors and as separate species by others. The tendency to treat the two as conspecifics may have its origin in erroneous nineteenth-century illustrations, and their allopatry has meant that twentieth-century adherence to the Biological Species Concept has hindered attempts to classify them to universal approval. This dichotomy of opinion is a hindrance to our understanding of both harriers, and may adversely affect their conservation.

[C hudsonius has recently been recognised as a distinct species by Simmons 2000 (Harriers), Ferguson-Lees & Christie 2001 (Raptors), Birding World, UK400 Club, and (tentatively) Rasmussen & Anderton 2005 (S Asia).]
 
BNA Online

Smith, Wittenberg, Macwhirter & Bildstein 2011. Northern Harrier Circus cyaneus. BNA Online 210 [27 Sep 2011].
Systematics: Related Species:
Old World and New World populations of C. cyaneus differ enough genetically, likely simply by virtue of having allopatric breeding ranges, that some have suggested they deserve to be treated as separate species (Simmons 2000, Ferguson-Lees and Christie 2001, Wink and Sauer-Gurth 2004). Some authorities have included C. cinereous [sic], the Cinereous Harrier of southern Central America, in C. cyaneus or grouped the two species into a superspecies (e.g., Amadon and Short 1976), but molecular phylogenetics imply that this species is distantly related to C. cyaneus (Wink and Sauer-Gurth 2004).
 
Based on my field knowledge of both, plumage being well different, shape slightly different and behaviour and voice similar, I'm favourable for splitting them as allospecies.

Cheers
 
Warning! This thread is more than 6 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top