I also prefer a smaller dimensioned x42 bin, rather than going down to the x32 class. This is for the added twilight factor, and brightness in practice, and ease of eye placement. The one thing that the x30/32 class do have going for them is the "virtual effect" of "stopping down" your own eye (exit<->pupil diameter) to use only the sharpest portion, at the sacrifice of some brightness. I suspect that much of the raving about the sharpness of x30/32 optics is down to this "effect"...... Wearing glasses to correct any vision deficiencies you should get just as sharp a view in practice through the x42's and much brighter during cloudy periods in the shadows, etc.
I am using a Zen-Ray ED3 8x43 which is pretty good bang for the buck, and though not a strict lightweight - feels quite light in the hand due to the open bridge design. It also has a fast Clockwise focuser with large knurled metal alloy focusing wheel which I like.
Be aware, that some units of just about all brands have quoibles and variability at this price point - so it's best to "hands-on" your actual purchase unit, or deal with a reputable supplier with solid returns and warranty support.
Thanks Chosun for speaking to some of my concerns! (or confirming my prejudices
) Sunrise and dusk are brief periods of the day, but cloudy days and forest walks make me feel like I'd appreciate that extra light! I'm no expert, but your explanation on why the 8x30 looks so good to people seems reasonable. Thanks too for the warning about individual units....
Funny about the focuser - direction isn't too important to me I think - seems I can't even say the direction of my current ones! I think I just adjust to whatever I pick up.
Hi Gretchen, I see you did stop at Lost Creek Shoe Shop. It has been quite a while for me to visit this shop. Were you in State College?
Yep, very quick in and out (no I didn't look for any rarely viewed sparrows :-O). Will be back again in a month or 2 probably...
Hi Gretchen,
If FOV is of importance together with good handling properties en good optical performance than it may be worthwile also to consider the Kite Lynx 8x30HD with an FOV of 151m/1000 m.
I haven't heard about this - are they sold in the States?
I'd agree with Chosun, you are going to get a lot more versatility out of a binocular with 42mm objective lenses than 32mm. Fortunately there are several very decent 8 x 42 binoculars that don't weigh much more than the popular 8 x 32 configurations either. Several folks have already mentioned the Zeiss Terra ED 8 x 42, which is barely over a pound and half and is definitely worth a look at $350. The Nikon Monarch 7 8 x 42 is a little lighter and has a larger field of view than the Zeiss and is currently only going for $380 since they have a $100 rebate going. The other one I would take a look at is the Celestron Trailseeker 8 x 42. ...
Thanks for mentioning the Celestron - don't think I tried that one. Puzzling why I didn't think the Monarch 7 looked better. On paper, and according to "everyone" it should be better than the Zeiss, but I just liked the Zeiss better.
It's a pain in the neck ordering the bins online and returning them if you don't like them. I did it twice and don't really want to do that again if I can avoid it...
Thanks for the very practical advice Annabeth!! (again confirming my prejudices, but still, nice to know that I'm not the only one who thinks that way) Also, since I'm traveling a fair bit in the next few months, so if I make the effort, I can stop places that have different bins. (And I'm working on another very consuming project, so this search is just a when-I-have-time hobby right now.)
I will recommend the Sightron Blue Sky 8x32. Open hinge design, light, easy to carry.
Thanks for this recommendation - it sounds appealing. As the same names reappear, I'm getting a better sense of what to give a look at.
Thanks all for your thoughts!