• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Take Three (1 Viewer)

OPTIC_NUT

Well-known member
There are likely many here with...um..a bunch of binoculars.
It has become apparent that for some, picking a 'best' to have and hold
would be as hard as for a sheik....the fun would be reduced.
I can't imagine just two without regrets.

So, let's say you were allowed only three pairs. Which three?
Careful, competitors in the same category will eclipse another if you
take them both.
 
1. Leupold Gold Ring HD 8x42
2. Bushnell Rangemaster 7x35, 1953 FPO version
3. Bausch & Lomb Zephyr 8x30, mine dates to 1951
Although in truth, to get to a minimum battery, I'd want a really good 8x32 roof, not yet found what I want
 
1. Zeiss Victory 8x32FL
2. Leica Trinovid 7x42
3. Zeiss (west) Oberkochen 8x30 Porro

But I have no self control where collecting binoculars is concerned, It would create a lot more room in my little house if I could only have 3, in truth, it would create more room if I could only have 20 !!
 
Last edited:
I'm sure a lot of us have more than three uses for binoculars, all requiring different specifications ...

My choices are all current makes :

Knockabout ... Zeiss Conquest HD 8x32

Daily Wear ... Nikon EDG 7x42

After Eight ... Nikon Monarch 5 8x56.
 
1. Zeiss Victory 8X32 FL
2. Leica Trinovid 8X32 BN
3. Zeiss Victory 10X32 FL

Wish list 7X42 Zeiss Victory or Leica Ultravid
 
No surprise here. ;)

8.5x42 SV, for pure birding
8x32 SV, for travel birding, for the wife
8x25 CL Pocket, for lighter travel, backpacking, just out for a walk

Small, medium, and large just about covers it for me. For some reason higher/lower powers don't grab me.
 
Are we referring to which three binoculars we would take out of our current selection or just which three binoculars we would take if we could take any three binoculars?
 
Ah.....good question. I was thinking that myself, units I want to get.

Let's say....you can include a model you don't own if you have direct viewing experience
or have drooled over a lot of reliable data and trusted reviews. (as opposed to
'hey, that would be fun to check out').

Dream binocs allowed, but only if the dream is very technical and vivid. ;-)
 
I'll go with the four I currently have:

1) 7x42 Nikon EDG
2) 8x32 zeiss Conquest HD
3) 7x36 opticron bga classic
4) 8x25 bushnell powerview compact

Plan to try the 7x42 leica UV and a few more reverse poro 8x compact... So that may change.

I know it is four and not three, but I'm a little non-conformist at times.

CG
 
Hmmm, if I had to pick from any binoculars I have owned or used extensively...price is no object... then....

7x42 Zeiss Victory FL (full sized)
8x32 Swaro SV EL (though I could certainly be happy with many others)

Don't really think I would need a third. I could go the compact route like Mark did. Not sure which one I would pick as I don't like dual hinge designs and none of the models I tried had particularly wide fields of view. I don't really like using anything under 13-14 ounces in general if I really want to key in on the view itself versus the portability. Maybe the Opticron Discovery 8x32 since it is so much smaller and daintier than any other 8x32...almost on par with most 8x25s in terms of overall space it occupies.

Truth be told I would take two binoculars and a compact 50 mm class spotter. ;)
 
Very hard. I have to exclude non-waterproof porros (SE & EII) from my harem, as I wouldn´t keep them if I were down to three. So itx42s:

1. Zeiss FL 7x42 (general use)
2, Swarovski SLC 15x56 (stationary seawatching)
2. Leica Ultravid 8x20 (cycling)
 
Hmm...

1. Leica Ultravid HD/BR or Swarovski SLC 7x42
2. Leupold Golden Ring HD 8x32
3. Vortex Razor HD 10x42

I've not looked through the Zeiss Victory FL 7x42, but I may find it preferable to the other 7x options listed.

The Golden Ring HD has amazing optics and ergonomics preferable to my hands and face.

If 10x binoculars had better DoF, I have a feeling I could use the 10x42 Razor HD as a primary binocular - wonderful handling capabilities, alpha-level optics (or at least splitting-hairs close), and a very wide TFoV(as a 10x) and AFoV.

Justin
 
Last edited:
I will hijack this thread since I have never looked thru an alpha.
What would be your top three if money was what defined what you owned?

Well if money was not at issue:
Leica Duovid 8-12x42
Swarovision 8x32
Leica 8x42 Ultravid, the determiner being their compact nature.

If money was the issue:
ZEN ED 2 7x36
Leupold Gold Ring 8x42
Leupold McKinley 10x42
 
I will hijack this thread since I have never looked thru an alpha.
What would be your top three if money was what defined what you owned?

Leupold McKinley BX-4 HD 10x42
Leupold Hawthorne 7x42
Vortex Viper HD 8x32

Warranty, customer service, and durability cause me to favor Leupold and Vortex at the lower-middle range of binoculars. The Zen ED2/ED3 7x36/7x43 would be the one that may supplant the Hawthorne, and the 8x32 Mojave (Based on Steve's and Frank's reviews) or original non-HD Golden Ring could supplant the Viper HD.
 
Last edited:
There are likely many here with...um..a bunch of binoculars.
It has become apparent that for some, picking a 'best' to have and hold
would be as hard as for a sheik....the fun would be reduced.
I can't imagine just two without regrets.

So, let's say you were allowed only three pairs. Which three?
Careful, competitors in the same category will eclipse another if you
take them both.
1)Swarovski Swarovision 8x32(Primary Birding Binocular)
2)Swarovski CL 8x30(Travel and Secondary Birding Binocular)
3)Swarovski CL-P 8x25(Compact Binocular)
 
I will hijack this thread since I have never looked thru an alpha.
What would be your top three if money was what defined what you owned?

I think you mean "if you couldn't spend a lot and spent to fill in the three".

How about $300 total for all three...let's be tough.
Other tradeoffs (like size) acceptable for some, to get the best you can.
..and, round it out for different contexts.
OK:

----Nikon Acculon 211 7x35
(many would agree it's jam-packed with greatness and a spectacular
bargain for $62 ...checked it at bhphotovideo)

----LL Bean / Bushnell 8x25 "Discovery": incredibly sharp bright wide view
for $50. My favorite surprise value, despite the odd silicone
body armor.

----Pentax 10x50 CF (right now, 62$) for distance.
...they are honkin' big, but the raves roll in for the view.
I saw some very far things sharp from the counter.
A good example of bang-per-buck in porro+size trade-off.

This is a good time for low-end bargains.
All 3 use the 'power of the porro' to give you a lot of bang for the buck.
One of the unsung benefits of the reverse-porro (the LL Beans) is
how easy precision assembly is in that 'box' chassis. More savings
and a little ruggedness. Not quite as "3D" but still stereo.

Incredible: it's under $200!
----------------------------------


Or....if you're low on cash but want 1 awesome thing, try the
Bushnell Elite 7x26 for about $240. Any sharper and you would cut
your retinas.

Or get 6.5x32 Meopta MeoPros for $300 and nothing else.

There are some very good roofs under $200 as well.
 
Last edited:
My favourite three are those I spent my money on, after carefully looking through many others:

Kowa Genesis 8x33
Nikon 8x30 EII
Swarovski EL 8x32 Swarovision
 
Warning! This thread is more than 10 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top