• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

"phase" or "morph"? (1 Viewer)

Samuel Perfect

Well-known member
Is there a difference between the use of the words "phase" and "morph"? I've been asking around about this a bit but I'm still not absolutely certain if there is a rule set in stone. I've gotten as far as to believe that "phase" refers to a changing stage in plumage colour and "morph" being a permanent colour type.

Any further info would be much appreciated :t:
 
I have to say I use the change pretty much interchangeably - worse than that I tend to say pale phase Arctic Skua but dark morph Arctic Skua - for no apparent reason.

For changing state of plumage I use a descriptor of the condition - ie winter plumaged.
 
I was shown this link but I don't think it resolves much... http://www.kastehachapibird.org/birding-articles/86-phase-morph-or-color-variations-.html

I don't think phase and morph should be used interchangeably though. It seems to me that "morph" is a more appropriate word when referring to skuas and buzzards etc. as they remain dark/intermediate/pale whilst "phase" suggests a change in the colour (although I can't think any examples off the top of my head where this would be the case)
 
Richards 1980 (The Birdwatcher's A-Z)...
Morph
A term introduced by J. S. Huxley to replace the less precise 'phase', denoting any one of the different forms of a species population subject to polymorphism.
See Polymorphism

Phase
Equivalent of morph.
See Morph

Polymorphism
The co-existence of two or more readily distinguishable 'morphs' or phases within a single inter-breeding population in numbers too great to be merely a recurrent mutation. The plumage phases differ markedly from each other independently of sex, age, season or geographical race. ...
 
Thanks for the reference, Richard. Nice to know the history. It's interesting that the two terms continue to coexist after all these years.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 10 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top