If anyone here has read the Cornell Lab Review, do you agree with the findings on the Audubon 8.5X44 for image quality? Cornell gave the Audubons a 3.8 out of a possible 5.0 for Image Quality, while S. Ingraham in BVD rated them even with the 8.5X42 Swaro EL's. From other reviewers or forums comments on these binoculars, I would have expected a much higher Image Quality ratings. Does anyone have any comments on the image quality of these binoculars? I would like any comments on the image quality of these binos. Was it possible the Cornell review had some flaws in the review, or possibly had a poor qulity Audubon?
Hogjaws
Hogjaws