• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Minox BD 8.5x43 BR Asph. Argon filled etc. (1 Viewer)

pezzer

Member
So I've gone ahead and purchased a pair of these to check out. I was inches from going for the Kahles 8x43 instead but the owner and a rep. at KB Cameras in Bellingham both had incredible things to say about this Minox (versus Kahles and others). Given that the Minox was slightly less ($549.00) they certainly didn't seem to have a sales agenda other than A pair of binos.

Anyone have exposure to this model and have remarks? I'll also welcome remarks on the Kahles (which I liked quite a bit in the store viewing).
 
Can't help with the 8.5x43, but I've had a pair of Minox 10x52,s for just over a year now and have found them excellent value for money with a crisp, sharp, neutral image. I had the eye cups changed from the old plastic method of raising them to the new steel ball bearing system which made a lot of difference, as the old system was too soft and the cups were easily pushed down. I sent them to Minox in (in England) for the change over on the Tuesday and had them back by Friday - fantastic service! Only complaint is the weight - they are a bit heavy after a day up on the Fells lugging them around plus a (fab) Zeiss 65mm scope and tripod combo. But then the solid construction did mean that when I accidently dropped them onto the quarry tiled kitchen floor all they suffered was a small dent to the casing.

Minox in England (Dave Morgan, www.dave.morgan.minox.co.uk is always interested in any feedback and very helpful

Good birding

Barry
 
I think the current Minox range is quite under-rated. I have the 10x58 ED which I bought for astronomy and low-light use. It's very impressive with a beautiful easy view that's very natural. I'd be interested to hear what you think of the 8.5's when you've had a chance to test them (they've been hovering on the edge of my wish-list for a while !).
Good luck.
 
had a play with the 8.5's a couple of months ago at cley,they are very similar to the leica trinovid's opticly.they have an outstanding field of view and good close focus.the trouble with this price range is the close proximity of trinovid range and nikon se etc,not that i am sudgesting the minox bins are a poor substitute.handing might well be prefered in these than said leicas or nikons.

matt
 
Interesting note re the similarity to Leica - Minox had a close tie-up with Leica until about the beginning of this year. I'm not sure what the relationship was exactly, but I believe Minox were glad when it came to an end and could go their on way.

Now that Minox have gone into a lower-priced binocular and have just bought out a porro prism range, will they be going up market and bring in a light weight top end bino to compete with Leica, Zeiss etc?

Will Dave at Minox read this and let us all know?

Barry
 
Minox 8.5x BR

I haven't yet received my new Minox but will surely post my impression of them when they come (which should be tomorrow). I have read at least one post that laments their limited FOV at 315ft/1000. While I see that this is somewhat narrow compared to other lines, I will reserve judgment until I hold and play with this new pair. At $549.00 US they seem a very reasonable offering for a product that some feel is just a small step below a Leica. If I do not like them i will probably be sending them back in favor of a pair of Kahles 8x.
 
Barry Robson wrote:

'Now that Minox have gone into a lower-priced binocular and have just bought out a porro prism range, will they be going up market and bring in a light weight top end bino to compete with Leica, Zeiss etc?
Will Dave at Minox read this and let us all know?'

well, just have to say that Dave at Minox has read this and will be 100% truthful when I say that I do not know what is happening next. Yes, I've been party to a few ideas etc but as yet no actual new product designs.

The new lightweight 'BLs' had some very good reviews in the popular birding press and the new Porros are due for review in the same magazines shortly, so with the different optical construction of Porros, we are waiting to see what the reviewers have to say. Both models had a very successful BBWF in terms of interest and sales and the Porros were given a very favourable welcome by all who tried them, the incredible depth of field being the overriding comment we received.

With reference to the 8.5x42 aspherics, I realise that the US market does have its price advantages at the moment, but am amazed that the 8.5x42s are being offered at $549.00, almost to the extent, Pezzer, that I'd be tempted to make sure that they were the newer Aspherical model you were buying and not an older non-aspherical model. For reference, the order code (on the box) for the newer aspherical model is 62124 and for the older non-asph model it's 62126.

The comparative FOV is down to the aspherical lenses used in the eyepiece construction - with most binoculars (unless you're going for the very top-end models such as Leica or Swarovski which eliminate this with highest quality glass, prisms and multi-coatings on all surfaces) you will experience some distortion to the edges of the FOV (barrelling). While giving the impression of a large field of view, this area is largely useless as it is out of focus by some degree. Aspheric lenses have been used in camera lenses for many years and now their use in the binoculars enables us to give a flat-field view and cut down this edge distortion by about 68% so you get 68% of this previously distorted area now in focus. The remaining 32% which would still be out of focus to some extent is removed and thus cuts down slightly on the FOV.

This is shown in diagramatic form on www.minoxuk.co.uk on the aspherics page.

I've got this thread updated via my email notification, so I'll keep an eye out in case anyone wants to know anything else about the product range and its specifics or where to see / try it in the UK.

ATVB,

Dave Morgan
Product Coordinator
Minox UK.


www.minoxuk.co.uk
B :)
 
minox 8.5 x 43

davem said:
Barry Robson wrote:

'Now that Minox have gone into a lower-priced binocular and have just bought out a porro prism range, will they be going up market and bring in a light weight top end bino to compete with Leica, Zeiss etc?
Will Dave at Minox read this and let us all know?'

well, just have to say that Dave at Minox has read this and will be 100% truthful when I say that I do not know what is happening next. Yes, I've been party to a few ideas etc but as yet no actual new product designs.

The new lightweight 'BLs' had some very good reviews in the popular birding press and the new Porros are due for review in the same magazines shortly, so with the different optical construction of Porros, we are waiting to see what the reviewers have to say. Both models had a very successful BBWF in terms of interest and sales and the Porros were given a very favourable welcome by all who tried them, the incredible depth of field being the overriding comment we received.

With reference to the 8.5x42 aspherics, I realise that the US market does have its price advantages at the moment, but am amazed that the 8.5x42s are being offered at $549.00, almost to the extent, Pezzer, that I'd be tempted to make sure that they were the newer Aspherical model you were buying and not an older non-aspherical model. For reference, the order code (on the box) for the newer aspherical model is 62124 and for the older non-asph model it's 62126.

The comparative FOV is down to the aspherical lenses used in the eyepiece construction - with most binoculars (unless you're going for the very top-end models such as Leica or Swarovski which eliminate this with highest quality glass, prisms and multi-coatings on all surfaces) you will experience some distortion to the edges of the FOV (barrelling). While giving the impression of a large field of view, this area is largely useless as it is out of focus by some degree. Aspheric lenses have been used in camera lenses for many years and now their use in the binoculars enables us to give a flat-field view and cut down this edge distortion by about 68% so you get 68% of this previously distorted area now in focus. The remaining 32% which would still be out of focus to some extent is removed and thus cuts down slightly on the FOV.

This is shown in diagramatic form on www.minoxuk.co.uk on the aspherics page.

I've got this thread updated via my email notification, so I'll keep an eye out in case anyone wants to know anything else about the product range and its specifics or where to see / try it in the UK.

ATVB,

Dave Morgan
Product Coordinator
Minox UK.


www.minoxuk.co.uk
B :)
I am quite sure that I'm getting the aspherical Minox. I ordered from KB Camera out of Bellingham, Washington. They had the best price. I will check on arrival of the binos today to be sure that I am getting what I expect. More anon...
 
Dave is being modest when he says the BLs had some good reviews - The editor of 'Birdwatching' magazine 'was taken aback at how modest the cost was' for the 8x42 and went on to say:
'In daylight the multicoated lenses deliver a lovely natural image and contrast was excellent. In dark understorey they were more than a match for some mid priced models in terms of resolution and brightness. Happily the Minox team have opted for a simple, modern straightforward shape that seemed immediately comfortable in the hand'.

A question for Dave:
Would it be possible to use the polycarbonate barrels used in the BL's in the top of the range models to produce a lighter bin but with the high quality optical performance we love in our aspheric BD/BR's?

Barry
 
I have the Kahles in 10x42 and I bought the Minox 10x42s for my best friend of 30+ years. There is virtually no difference in the two except the $50.00 more that the Kahles cost. Both are as good as anything that you can get without spending well over $1,000.00. The one area that the Kahles has a slight edge is in low-light performance. You can still identify targets with the Kahles about ten minutes after the Minox gives out. Not really enough of an issue to worry about. Bottom line, I would not have bought them for my buddy if I they were not of great quality.

ranburr
 
Interesting comments and I whole heartedly agrre with the optical quality comments. Also, I have tried Swaros and Leicas and was unhappy with the focus mechanism on both, particularly the Leica - very lumpy and not what I expected from a £900+ bino.

re the light issue, perhaps you should have given the 10x52s a whirl?

A thought - why do all magazines revue 8x models and completey ignore 10x - most Birders I know use 10x

Cheers

B
 
minox 8.5 x 42 Asph.

Well I got the Minox in yesterday and I'm impressed. Bear in mind that I've been using 8x42 Swift Ultralights for the last 10 years. The Minox balance well in my hands and the image is spectacular. The Chestnut-backed Chickadees that are swarming at our feeder now are glorious. As far as a more restricted field of view I just don't know that I will have a significant issue with this -- most of my birding is spotting particular targets and locking in.

A couple of points: reviewers often subtract pointes from binos that lack a locking diopter and the twist up eye cups with detents. These Minox have neither of these features and I'm not really bothered. I would like to see the eye cups click into the fully extended mode or into the fully collapsed mode, but this is a minor quibble. Also, the objective lens covers seem to have no method of attachment to the barrels when not in use and therefore may become easily lost. Is the thought that they are just not generally used much except when storing the binos? Anyone have a tip on how they manage that one?

Dave from Minox UK expressed some skepticism that I was actually receiving the Asphericals for the $549 price. I can now say with complete confidence that I have indeed received a brand new pair of BR Asphericals for that price and that the customer service was excellent. KB Camera in Washington state.

Final note -- my wife thinks the bins are heavy. I think they feel solid. If I was traveling extra light (backpacking) I might think twice about toting them along but I'd feel that way about virtually any 8 or 10x product. Anyone have a suggestion on a stellar and reasonably priced travel bino?

Cheers.
 
I'm in two minds about the weight issue - you're right they feel solid and that you could knock nails in with them, this doesn't make me feel too guilty about the heavy use mine get but as I said in my first posting, after a 10-12 mile hike over the fells lugging the scope, tripod and 10x52 bins I begin to feel that anything that would reduce the weight of the kit would be useful - but still a great bin…

B
 
barry robson said:
I'm in two minds about the weight issue - you're right they feel solid and that you could knock nails in with them, this doesn't make me feel too guilty about the heavy use mine get but as I said in my first posting, after a 10-12 mile hike over the fells lugging the scope, tripod and 10x52 bins I begin to feel that anything that would reduce the weight of the kit would be useful - but still a great bin…

B

I'm going to try out some different strap options and see if a wider/spiffier strap doesn't cut down on neck fatigue. Do your eye cups twist and lock into place or do they simply twist up or down?
 
barry robson said:
re the light issue, perhaps you should have given the 10x52s a whirl? A thought - why do all magazines revue 8x models and completey ignore 10x - most Birders I know use 10x

Cheers
B

We wanted to do an apples to apples comparison of the binos. Thus a 10x42 vs a 10x42. Incidentally, we also used Docter 10x42s, and Pentax SP 10x43s in these informal evaluations. Pezzer, go to your local Walmart and purchase yourself a Bino Suspender from "Crooked Horn Outfitters". This will be the best $20.00 that you can spend. You will experience zero neck strain with these and your binos are always available for immediate use.

ranburr
 
ranburr said:
We wanted to do an apples to apples comparison of the binos. Thus a 10x42 vs a 10x42. Incidentally, we also used Docter 10x42s, and Pentax SP 10x43s in these informal evaluations. Pezzer, go to your local Walmart and purchase yourself a Bino Suspender from "Crooked Horn Outfitters". This will be the best $20.00 that you can spend. You will experience zero neck strain with these and your binos are always available for immediate use.

ranburr
Thanks for the tip!
 
Hi Pezzer & Ranburr

Don' have a 'Crooked Horn Outfitter' over here - will look out for one on my next trip to your Fab country (did Washington/Oregon/California this year over a 4 week driving trip).

My bins have twist up mechanism that stays in place beautifully. They originally fittedv with a plastic mechanism that was a real pain - too soft and kept pushing down, but Minox replaced them with the new stiffer system (in 4 days including post!) free of charge and its made a world of difference.

Cheers

B
 
barry robson said:
Hi Pezzer & Ranburr

Don' have a 'Crooked Horn Outfitter' over here - will look out for one on my next trip to your Fab country (did Washington/Oregon/California this year over a 4 week driving trip).

My bins have twist up mechanism that stays in place beautifully. They originally fittedv with a plastic mechanism that was a real pain - too soft and kept pushing down, but Minox replaced them with the new stiffer system (in 4 days including post!) free of charge and its made a world of difference.

Cheers

B
Hi Barry: I'm not sure if my new Minox come with the plastic mechanism you mention or the stiffer version. I do wish that the eye cups had the detents as they rotate out similar to the Pentax DCF-SP. I do find that with repeated placement of the rain cover the eye cups can shift downwards. Having just gotten the binos I'm hesitant to send them off to Germany or wherever just yet! I like them very much and yet I'm still wondering how much I might be missing by having a field of view of 315 feet. I am also wondering why the objective lens covers do not have a decent method of attachment to the barrels. i've put mine in the shipping box for safe keeping as they seem easily lost. Does that jive with your experience?

I feel fortunate to live in Oregon -- just got a report tonight from our local hawk migration and banding station on Mt. Hood and the fellow in charge uo there reported catching a second year Bald Eagle that initially went for the pigeon lure (and made contact) and then was caught in a mist net. This is only the 3rd bald eagle caught at a Hawkwatch International site in the last 20 plus years! When I worked at the site we caught Goldens, but NEVER had a go at a Bald. Unbelievable!!
 
Warning! This thread is more than 18 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top