That's what it looks like to me. The low number of ridges on the focus knob makes me think that this is not a top of the line model. Usually with Leica, the more detailed the focus knob, the more expensive the model.
Good point about the focus wheel CF.
But it is hard to imagine any manufacturer kicking off a new line with 56s or even 50s.
And although the name is Noctivid, suggesting night-vision, the Little Owl used in the teaser is definitely not a night-time specialist and is active in daylight.
So I am thinking 32 or 42, but I haven't a clue about the market positioning.
Going back to the focus wheel the Geovids don't have very 'detailed' wheels and they are not 'economy-priced'. Also the Trinovids carry the red Leica logo low on the right hand optical tube and I think we would be able to see the edge of it in the Russian pic. So unless it has been Photoshopped out, if the logo is high up the tube then this might indicate a top line model. Or not :-O.
Lee
I think we can rule out a 32mm. I measured the size ratio between ocular and objective in photos and the Noctivid* is around 80%. Thats in the same range as the rest of Leica 42mm bins. The UVHD 32mm has a ratio of over 90%, and the 50-56mm bins is lower at around 70%. But I won't eat my hat on it.
See table attached.
*I found a full resolution photo where the outlines could be seen much better: http://www.forestitalia.com/leicablog/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/ADV_SO_Noctivid_210x285_3mm.jpg
That's what it looks like to me. The low number of ridges on the focus knob makes me think that this is not a top of the line model. Usually with Leica, the more detailed the focus knob, the more expensive the model.
Why not just wait until bird fair? All will become clear ( excuse the intended pun).
Why not just wait until bird fair? All will become clear ( excuse the intended pun).
Why should we? Speculation is part of the fun. Waiting is a very dry and boring thing. I am afraid Leica is following the Swarovski bridge design, making their superb binos turn into the super ugly swaro look. The bridge design for me is a reason never to buy a swaro. When Leica is going that way I will be desperate in the future.
it is hard to imagine any manufacturer kicking off a new line with 56s or even 50s.
And although the name is Noctivid, suggesting night-vision, the Little Owl used in the teaser is definitely not a night-time specialist and is active in daylight.
So I am thinking 32 or 42, but I haven't a clue about the market positioning.
For the name to have any meaning, they should have a large exit pupil size IMHO. Something like 7x50 or 6x42 perhaps? Would be a very bold move.
It has a built in flashlight and, when turned on (button on top of focus wheel), the beam comes out of the hinge at the objective end.
For the name to have any meaning, they should have a large exit pupil size IMHO. Something like 7x50 or 6x42 perhaps? Would be a very bold move.
I agree that a large exit pupil is preferred for use in very low light.
I would say 6 mm would be enough to call it a nocturnal bin.
In that case it would be a 7x bin, but I don't think that is very likely.
7x bins don't sell much.
Another alternativ is very high transmission, let's say
95% transmission in the whole range 400-700 nm,
that would be nocturnal enough for me.
But It's not the marketing department that develops the binoculars...
So I guess it will be something more modest than that.
Progress in binoculars seem to be rather slow and take small steps so
I wouldn't expect to much from the marketing fluff.
Exactly VB.
But there is still the mysterious split ring with space for a fingertip to execute some sort of switch, just underneath the focus wheel.
Lee
It's for activating the built-in tele-converter.
Switching between 7x and 10x mag!
B
Exactly VB.
But there is still the mysterious split ring with space for a fingertip to execute some sort of switch, just underneath the focus wheel.
Lee