abritinquint
Member
Hi There,
https://flic.kr/p/Aw3vub
Looking for some extra reach, I recently picked up a Sigma DG 120-400mm f4.5-5.6 (APO HSM to be specific). When I compare my images to those of the Nikkor 70-300mm f4.5-5.6 (ED VR) that I've been using with my Nikon D5300 for some time now, I find the Sigma produces a much softer/cloudier image at full range (400mm). Some of my images look almost like they're in the style of a water colour painting. Now I know the light isn't great at this time of year (even at midday), but I'm still somewhat surprised by the effect. Of course, the that much ISO could just be too much for my lens/camera combo to cope with.
If anybody has experience of using this lens, I'd welcome a second opinion or any tips on usage. I typically use OS setting 1 when hand-holding or have OS switched off when using a monopod. This specific shot was taken using a monopod. Cheers...
https://flic.kr/p/Aw3vub
Looking for some extra reach, I recently picked up a Sigma DG 120-400mm f4.5-5.6 (APO HSM to be specific). When I compare my images to those of the Nikkor 70-300mm f4.5-5.6 (ED VR) that I've been using with my Nikon D5300 for some time now, I find the Sigma produces a much softer/cloudier image at full range (400mm). Some of my images look almost like they're in the style of a water colour painting. Now I know the light isn't great at this time of year (even at midday), but I'm still somewhat surprised by the effect. Of course, the that much ISO could just be too much for my lens/camera combo to cope with.
If anybody has experience of using this lens, I'd welcome a second opinion or any tips on usage. I typically use OS setting 1 when hand-holding or have OS switched off when using a monopod. This specific shot was taken using a monopod. Cheers...
Last edited: