Join for FREE
It only takes a minute!

Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old Friday 24th August 2012, 22:37   #26
joe101
Registered User
 
joe101's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: singapore
Posts: 311
Quote:
Originally Posted by ceasar View Post
Southern Hemisphere price will be higher!

Bob
huh why ?


joe101 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 26th August 2012, 12:20   #27
James Bean
Registered User

 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chester, England.
Posts: 732
Isn't it obvious? Because you're antipodean (aka 'southpaws' or 'left-footers') they have to make special upside-down models for you blokes 'down under', so costs go up of course... Crikey, mate, it's not rocket science!
James Bean is offline  
Reply With Quote
BF Supporter 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Click here to Support BirdForum
Old Sunday 26th August 2012, 13:02   #28
Robert Wallace
Registered User

 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Halifax West Yorkshire
Posts: 313
Quote:
Originally Posted by James Bean View Post
Isn't it obvious? Because you're antipodean (aka 'southpaws' or 'left-footers') they have to make special upside-down models for you blokes 'down under', so costs go up of course... Crikey, mate, it's not rocket science!
Oh heck does that mean my current binoculars won't work when I visit Singapore in a few weeks time?!
Sounds like just the excuse I needed to buy some new bins.
Robert Wallace is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 26th August 2012, 13:57   #29
Troubador
Registered User

 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 887
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Wallace View Post
Oh heck does that mean my current binoculars won't work when I visit Singapore in a few weeks time?!
Sounds like just the excuse I needed to buy some new bins.
Yes Robert and don't forget to take some hangunder tablets for those mornings after..............

Lee
Troubador is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 26th August 2012, 14:29   #30
joe101
Registered User
 
joe101's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: singapore
Posts: 311
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Wallace View Post
Oh heck does that mean my current binoculars won't work when I visit Singapore in a few weeks time?!
Sounds like just the excuse I needed to buy some new bins.
Guys, Singapore is in the northern hemisphere, if you din't know that .
A nickname of our city is one degree north, or at least to local astronomers

Last edited by joe101 : Sunday 26th August 2012 at 14:32.
joe101 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 26th August 2012, 15:06   #31
Troubador
Registered User

 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 887
Quote:
Originally Posted by joe101 View Post
Guys, Singapore is in the northern hemisphere, if you din't know that .
A nickname of our city is one degree north, or at least to local astronomers
Apologies for our ignorance Joe, still, what's one degree between pals?

Lee
Troubador is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 26th August 2012, 15:10   #32
ticl2184
Registered User

 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: isle of Wight
Posts: 152
Would it be possible for Mark or Gary from Zeiss UK to comment on the "actual" reason for the delay in the release of the HT's ?
ticl2184 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 29th August 2012, 19:25   #33
ticl2184
Registered User

 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: isle of Wight
Posts: 152
Quote:
Would it be possible for Mark or Gary from Zeiss UK to comment on the "actual" reason for the delay in the release of the HT's ?
Obviously not !
ticl2184 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 29th August 2012, 20:15   #34
garymh
Registered User
 
garymh's Avatar

 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northampton, UK
Posts: 241
Quote:
Originally Posted by ticl2184 View Post
Obviously not !

Obviously yes !!!!!

The Schott HT glass that we are using in the Victory HT binocular is a brand new innovation.

As with all new products of this nature we are ensuring that the quality is consistent and that all binoculars of this series will give the same results.

We want to produce the ultimate binocular range with a consistently high quality and unfortunately there have been delays while we get things perfect.
garymh is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 30th August 2012, 01:18   #35
spiralcoil
Registered User

 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North America
Posts: 62
Hi, what would be the reason for Zeiss against the use of "field flattener" on the new HT to compete with the Swaro SV?



Quote:
Originally Posted by garymh View Post
Obviously yes !!!!!

The Schott HT glass that we are using in the Victory HT binocular is a brand new innovation.

As with all new products of this nature we are ensuring that the quality is consistent and that all binoculars of this series will give the same results.

We want to produce the ultimate binocular range with a consistently high quality and unfortunately there have been delays while we get things perfect.
spiralcoil is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 30th August 2012, 01:30   #36
NDhunter
Registered User

 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: ND
Posts: 1,666
Quote:
Originally Posted by spiralcoil View Post
Hi, what would be the reason for Zeiss against the use of "field flattener" on the new HT to compete with the Swaro SV?
With Zeiss it seems the goal is brightness, or transmission, as these are designed for the hunter in mind, not the birder.
To get better edges using field flatteners would require an all new ocular lens
design, multiple lenses and more complicated.
They are not ready for that, and so the high end sales side will still be solidly
Swarovski.
In the US, Swarovski is easily the sales leader. Just check this out with any
large sporting goods store.
I don't see anything Zeiss changing that at all.

Jerry
NDhunter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 30th August 2012, 06:14   #37
Troubador
Registered User

 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 887
Quote:
Originally Posted by NDhunter View Post
With Zeiss it seems the goal is brightness, or transmission, as these are designed for the hunter in mind, not the birder.
To get better edges using field flatteners would require an all new ocular lens
design, multiple lenses and more complicated.
They are not ready for that, and so the high end sales side will still be solidly
Swarovski.
In the US, Swarovski is easily the sales leader. Just check this out with any
large sporting goods store.
I don't see anything Zeiss changing that at all.

Jerry
I can state categorically that the HTs have not been designed solely for, nor solely with input from, hunters.

The absence of field flatteners is not evidence of the absence of consideration for birders' needs or the needs of those wanting a general purpose nature observation instrument.

Hunters are an important segment of the market but the notion that brightness is only important to hunters and not to birders or naturalists seems misguided to me.

Zeiss has its own views on the value of field flatteners, central sharpness vs edge sharpness etc. Its up to individuals whether this view suits their requirements or not.

One thing is absolutley clear:HTs are for everybody not just hunters.

If you have been, thank you for listening.................

Lee
Troubador is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 30th August 2012, 09:41   #38
ticl2184
Registered User

 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: isle of Wight
Posts: 152
Quote:
Obviously yes !!!!!
Thanks for the reply Gary.

Tim
ticl2184 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 30th August 2012, 22:04   #39
garymh
Registered User
 
garymh's Avatar

 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northampton, UK
Posts: 241
Hi Tim,

You're welcome,


Gary.
garymh is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 30th August 2012, 22:32   #40
NDhunter
Registered User

 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: ND
Posts: 1,666
Quote:
Originally Posted by Troubador View Post
I can state categorically that the HTs have not been designed solely for, nor solely with input from, hunters.

The absence of field flatteners is not evidence of the absence of consideration for birders' needs or the needs of those wanting a general purpose nature observation instrument.

Hunters are an important segment of the market but the notion that brightness is only important to hunters and not to birders or naturalists seems misguided to me.

Zeiss has its own views on the value of field flatteners, central sharpness vs edge sharpness etc. Its up to individuals whether this view suits their requirements or not.

One thing is absolutley clear:HTs are for everybody not just hunters.

If you have been, thank you for listening.................

Lee
Lee:

I am well aware that these new binoculars will be used by all.
If you look back at the thread on here titled "Here are the new Victories...."
there are several posts that promote the initial marketing to hunters.

From Mr. Jenson, Pres. of Carl Zeiss, North America,

"This will be a core hunting product".

"The first real "super premium binocular" built by hunters for hunters."

The initial marketing push is to the hunting sector. That is not good or
bad, just wanting to remind how Zeiss promotes its products.

Jerry
NDhunter is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 31st August 2012, 06:27   #41
Troubador
Registered User

 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 887
Quote:
Originally Posted by NDhunter View Post
Lee:

I am well aware that these new binoculars will be used by all.
If you look back at the thread on here titled "Here are the new Victories...."
there are several posts that promote the initial marketing to hunters.

From Mr. Jenson, Pres. of Carl Zeiss, North America,

"This will be a core hunting product".

"The first real "super premium binocular" built by hunters for hunters."

The initial marketing push is to the hunting sector. That is not good or
bad, just wanting to remind how Zeiss promotes its products.

Jerry
Hi Jerry

You are not wrong about the marketing, thats for sure.

The problem in this case is when some people interpret this as meaning the HT was designed solely for hunters.

Lee
Troubador is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Saturday 1st September 2012, 02:41   #42
motts
Registered User

 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 69
I'd let your eyes determine which bino is appropriate...not a corporate marketing team. Many hunters have known for years that if they wanted info on the best binos...find out what birders were using...no matter if the binos were marketed at birders or not.

I suppose hunters may put a higher priority on low light performance over sharpenss or contrast. However, usually there are multiple bins that will get the job done. I don't like to get to technical over it all. I just try a bunch out and get the one that looks good and feels right to me.

When you're talking top tier, Alpha, bins especially...the minute differences aren't gonna make you not ID a bird or miscount tines on antlers...they'll all be able to do the job or they all won't. It's just personal preferences on what your individual eyes prefer and personal ergonomics.
motts is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Saturday 1st September 2012, 08:08   #43
Troubador
Registered User

 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 887
Quote:
Originally Posted by motts View Post
I'd let your eyes determine which bino is appropriate...not a corporate marketing team. Many hunters have known for years that if they wanted info on the best binos...find out what birders were using...no matter if the binos were marketed at birders or not.

I suppose hunters may put a higher priority on low light performance over sharpenss or contrast. However, usually there are multiple bins that will get the job done. I don't like to get to technical over it all. I just try a bunch out and get the one that looks good and feels right to me.

When you're talking top tier, Alpha, bins especially...the minute differences aren't gonna make you not ID a bird or miscount tines on antlers...they'll all be able to do the job or they all won't. It's just personal preferences on what your individual eyes prefer and personal ergonomics.

Exactly.

Lee
Troubador is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Saturday 1st September 2012, 10:13   #44
Stanbo
Registered User

 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 41
Quote:
Originally Posted by motts View Post
I'd let your eyes determine which bino is appropriate...not a corporate marketing team. Many hunters have known for years that if they wanted info on the best binos...find out what birders were using...no matter if the binos were marketed at birders or not.

I suppose hunters may put a higher priority on low light performance over sharpenss or contrast. However, usually there are multiple bins that will get the job done. I don't like to get to technical over it all. I just try a bunch out and get the one that looks good and feels right to me.

When you're talking top tier, Alpha, bins especially...the minute differences aren't gonna make you not ID a bird or miscount tines on antlers...they'll all be able to do the job or they all won't. It's just personal preferences on what your individual eyes prefer and personal ergonomics.

A bit of common sense for a change - well said Motts. Everyone has different eyes.

Stan
Stanbo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 7th September 2012, 16:50   #45
Troubador
Registered User

 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 887
Zeiss USA are still showing 15th Sept as the launch date for HTs.

Looks like at long last its going to happen.

Lee
Troubador is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 10th September 2012, 16:50   #46
ticl2184
Registered User

 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: isle of Wight
Posts: 152
I hear from someone at Zeiss Uk that delivery for the Uk is October. Perhaps the US will get the first taste of HT's ?
ticl2184 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 10th September 2012, 18:05   #47
joe101
Registered User
 
joe101's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: singapore
Posts: 311
I got a feeling no
joe101 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 10th September 2012, 18:30   #48
Troubador
Registered User

 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 887
Quote:
Originally Posted by joe101 View Post
I got a feeling no
Hi Joe

I think the US will get them first. Last month by this time Zeiss US had pulled the launch date of Aug 15th and replaced it with 15th Sept. We are only days away now and the Zeiss US site is still showing 15th Sept.

Last UK delivery I heard was of tiny quantities arriving end Sept and then supply building up through Oct.

Lee
Troubador is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Wednesday 12th September 2012, 07:42   #49
ticl2184
Registered User

 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: isle of Wight
Posts: 152
Were getting pretty close now. Surely dealers in the US know if there getting a delivery of HT's this Friday or not ?
ticl2184 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tanzania August September 2011 Hanno Vacational Trip Reports 34 Tuesday 4th October 2011 09:46
Birdwatching at Algarve at August/September rivieren Portugal including Madeira 2 Wednesday 24th August 2011 18:13
KENYA - August/September Bob Biggs Vacational Trip Reports 1 Monday 20th September 2010 08:15
Mull - August or September? clarity Scotland 4 Friday 3rd April 2009 22:41
Florida, August/September? Jos Stratford Florida 3 Wednesday 28th May 2008 00:53

{googleads}
Fatbirder's Top 1000 Birding Websites

Search the net with ask.com
Help support BirdForum
Ask.com and get

Page generated in 0.22573304 seconds with 36 queries
All times are GMT. The time now is 23:38.