• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Japanese Sparrowhawk? Singapore, Oct 2017 (1 Viewer)

TwiddlingThumbs

Well-known member
These rather poor quality photos are at 150% crop as the bird was flying real high. They have been brightened up due to strong shadows. Hopefully there are enough details to provide an ID.

Is this a female Japanese Sparrowhawk (notch in tail)?

Appreciate help with the ID.
 

Attachments

  • JS.JPG
    JS.JPG
    20.3 KB · Views: 40
  • JS2.JPG
    JS2.JPG
    23.4 KB · Views: 47
Hi TT,
It is a Japanese Sparrowhawk but I do not think you can id. a female Japanese Sparrowhawk by the notch in its tail. These maybe be poor quality photos to you but to my mind they do illustrate the differences in silhouette between Eurasian and Japanese Sparrowhawk. Four prominent fingers are showing in your photo with #6 being almost level with the slight secondary bulge.
 
Hi TT,
sorry to confuse but did mean #6 primary. This is a feature for critical identification #6 is still a primary feather and some of the other species of hawks have this#6 feathers far more projecting. The effect in the field is to make our Eurasian Sparrowhawk look long-winged when directly compared in the field to some of the Asian hawks. Hope this is more intelligible.
 
Its a juvenile Japanese Sparrowhawk on account of 5 'fingers' and obvious cleft in in tail. Eurasian has 6 fingers and lacks the mesial streak, different proportions etc.

Eurasian Sparrowhawk is very scarce in the Peninsula e.g <10 recorded annually (autumn) at Khao Dinsor in Thailand and it is a rare vagrant in Singapore.

Grahame
 
Warning! This thread is more than 7 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top