• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

The Ultimate Binoculars....totally regardless of cost (1 Viewer)

Saving a few ounces will not have the desired revolutionary impact.

Check out the 'Weight Weenies' website for cyclists obsessed with weight savings. They post 'before and after' photos of bike parts, weighed on digital scales, and remove tiny bits of paint, or miniscule decals from front stems, etc., to show savings of tiny fractions of a gram. One guy worried that a single red wheel spoke (the others were black) might be adding excess weight to his bike via the paint involved. They are delightfully loony, and it's a comfort to know that they're out there, making us feel normal. Which of course we aren't. At the other end of the crazy-spectrum, there may be people who worry and obsess about nothing at all. If I meet any, I'll let y'all know!

P.S. - the ultimate birding bino is an EII or SE (whichever mag you fancy) that's also waterproof.
 
Last edited:
Presumably any big zoom glass would need to be built around a single objective, to keep out of the collimation thicket. So a stabilized zoom monocular with a binoviewer at the end.

No,two objectives for the 3d binocular effect..the collimation issue i dont see it,to keep both barrels magnification equal is the design challenge here..but to make a barlow move precisely in two barrels at the same time should not be different to the issue of making to lenses focus in the same point in two barrels.
 
since all binoculars are compromises with weight, mag, size, optics
the ultimate binocular would have to DO IT ALL
-focus 12" to infinity
-zoom from 5x to 15x (to 50x if astronomy is included)
-IS or light enough to hold steady
-cheap enough for most to afford
-everyone would agree this is the best one

edj
 
No,two objectives for the 3d binocular effect..the collimation issue i dont see it,to keep both barrels magnification equal is the design challenge here..but to make a barlow move precisely in two barrels at the same time should not be different to the issue of making to lenses focus in the same point in two barrels.

The higher power binoculars currently available have much heavier frames than normal, presumably to ensure the optics remain aligned.
The thought was that sacrificing the 3d effect was worthwhile, because a single objective design could be much lighter and hence portable.
 
I think there might be a future for binoculars with EVFs (Electronic ViewFinders) as opposed to looking straight through glass. Reasons:

1) EVFs are improving quickly. Epson recently announced a 4.41mp EVF (probably as used in Leica SL cameras). As EVF resolution improves, OVFs(Optical ViewFinders) may no longer have superior optics.

http://www.dpreview.com/articles/7963916751/epson-mass-produces-4-41m-dot-lcd

2) EVFs allow information overlays (very useful if image capture is part of the plan).

3) EVFs can offer a 'live view' that can greatly enhance the image. For example, depending on the sensor that is used, the EVF can produce a relatively bright image in relatively dark conditions (much moreso than an OVF could provide).

4) EVFs can be stabilized much easier than OVFs.

5) EVFs can be digitally collimated. This is somewhat of a reach at the moment, but as processor speed improves, images from two different objectives can be combined/aligned even if/when objects are out-of-collimation. This could open the door to some interesting 3D views.

6) There is the possibility of having hybrid binoculars with both an EVF and an OVF, which may reduce cost of having two EVFs, two objective sensors, etc.

7) Image capture technology will become much better. Yes, the binocular cameras that have been available have been very gimmicky and poor image quality. However, if you have a high-performance processor and high-performance sensors, quality image capture becomes more of a reality. As an example, several modern cameras can capture 8mp stills from 4k video (this is MUCH better quality than, say, taking a screenshot of a video on your computer). Panasonic is rapidly working to develop sensors that enable 33mp still images to be extracted from 8k video by 2018.

8) we all know that larger sensors can gather/capture more light - simple physics. Larger sensors also require larger glass and faster processors. On the flipside, smaller sensors can use smaller/lighter glass, but gather less light. However, as processor speeds increase, you can leverage that processing power to extract more light from the smaller sensor image. As an example, suppose you can stack 60 images together over a one-second period, and add all of their light together - you get a very bright image. Of course, no one wants a one-second lag in their viewing, but those speeds will increase along with processor evolution, and you may only need a few frames which might only require hundredths, or thousands, of a second. Twenty years from now, it will be essentially real-time.

All of this technology is being developed in the optics industry, primarily for cameras, including surveillance cameras. If we are near the zenith for optical glass, the next logical step forward is electronically-enhanced glass. It is only a matter of time before the technology makes the leap from cameras to binoculars...
 
Last edited:
How experienced are they with bins? I'm thinking...how many of these folk have witnessed and reflected upon the natural wonders which you have yourself - looking through binoculars? :t:

Happy Christmas Brockner,

Rathaus

They don't need experience, that's what personal assistants are for. ;)

Merry Christmas to you and your Rathäuser.

<B>
 
Warning! This thread is more than 8 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top