black lark
Registered User
is there someone who uses the scope without the stay on cover, i want to use it without the cover, the scope can take this i believe !!!!!!
is there someone who uses the scope without the stay on cover, i want to use it without the cover, the scope can take this i believe !!!!!!
I have one this last 5 months, and I don´t have a cover. My instinct is not to get one unless absolutely necessary. I had a cover on my old Swaro 65 and hated it, it simply took all the ergonomic advantages of the Swaro scope and destroyed them. On the Nikon ED82A, I really don´t want to go through that again. I haven´t seen a cover, but can´t imagine how the helical focussing ring would be perfectly accessible under any kind of cover, unless it were (the cover) in two sections. If the scope is bombproof and waterproof, I can´t think why one would need a cover anyway. To transport it, I use a bag. If it pours rain while seawatching, I put the bag over it. Elegant, simple, cheap. BTW, I have the ED50 too, and didn´t get a cover for that (although I was tempted after Penny Clarke´s recommendation of same). The only thing about the ED´s that I find a (very mild) concern is losing the lens covers at both ends, they´re very loose. So I´m currently experimenting with old coffee jar lids and the like to come up with replacements. Best of luck, if you do get a cover that you really like, please post us! (Hey, isn´t the ED82 a brilliant scope, or what???)
Funnily enough, no, it didn´t. I had no idea it was being marketed elsewhere with a cover. I didn´t buy it in Ireland (never buy optics in Ireland, the prices are silly), I got it from an online operation in England called Warehouse Express. Maybe sometimes it´s bundled with a cover and eyepiece, but I bought mine body only, as I´d already gotten the eyepieces with the ED50. (Which also came without a cover, in my case).didn't your ED come with the stay-on velcro cover?
i thought it was standard issue.
I have one this last 5 months, and I don´t have a cover. My instinct is not to get one unless absolutely necessary. I had a cover on my old Swaro 65 and hated it, it simply took all the ergonomic advantages of the Swaro scope and destroyed them. On the Nikon ED82A, I really don´t want to go through that again. I haven´t seen a cover, but can´t imagine how the helical focussing ring would be perfectly accessible under any kind of cover, unless it were (the cover) in two sections. If the scope is bombproof and waterproof, I can´t think why one would need a cover anyway. To transport it, I use a bag. If it pours rain while seawatching, I put the bag over it. Elegant, simple, cheap. BTW, I have the ED50 too, and didn´t get a cover for that (although I was tempted after Penny Clarke´s recommendation of same). The only thing about the ED´s that I find a (very mild) concern is losing the lens covers at both ends, they´re very loose. So I´m currently experimenting with old coffee jar lids and the like to come up with replacements. Best of luck, if you do get a cover that you really like, please post us! (Hey, isn´t the ED82 a brilliant scope, or what???)
The cover is useful however as protection when traveling.
Anybody want to sell me theirs?
Please forgive me if unsolicited bids are taboo here at BF.