Join for FREE
It only takes a minute!
Experience the Great Outdoors. New Zeiss Terra ED Binoculars. Visit our online shop to find out more!

Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old Thursday 30th March 2017, 22:01   #1
Rapala
Registered User
 
Rapala's Avatar

 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Michigan
Posts: 822
For Critique: Barred Owl Photos

These photos are the result of a chance encounter with a Barred Owl just several days ago. I spotted the owl fly across the road, and it remained in the nearby trees for several minutes These are three of the better photos, but I'm not sure which I like best. The bright gray sky in the background of photos 2 and 3 is a drawback, however, photos 2 and 3 are slightly sharper than photo number 1. Which do you prefer and why?

EXIF (all photos)
1/400
f/5.6
ISO 1000

Taken with Canon T4i and Canon 400 f/5.6L lens
Minor adjustments made in Adobe Lightroom 6

Thanks for the critique!
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	BAOW1i.jpg
Views:	44
Size:	137.8 KB
ID:	620503  Click image for larger version

Name:	BAOW2i.jpg
Views:	38
Size:	139.4 KB
ID:	620504  Click image for larger version

Name:	BAOW3i.jpg
Views:	53
Size:	144.3 KB
ID:	620505  
__________________
A bird doesn't sing because it has an answer, it sings because it has a song. -Maya Angelou
Latest Lifer- Eastern Whip-poor-will
My Gallery

Last edited by Rapala : Thursday 30th March 2017 at 22:15.
Rapala is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 30th March 2017, 23:44   #2
fugl
Registered User

 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Reno, Nevada
Posts: 12,476
Yeah, #1 is a bit soft, otherwise it would be my first choice. Of the other two, #3 is best in my opinion because of the direction of gaze and overall expression. You could always darken the sky a bit in post-processing (though it looks fine on my monitor. . .).
__________________
Bird photos (Flickr): http://www.flickr.com/photos/fugl/
". . .Let them be left, O let them be left, wildness and wet;
Long live the weeds and the wilderness yet."

--Gerard Manley Hopkins

Last edited by fugl : Friday 31st March 2017 at 01:05.
fugl is offline  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Old Friday 31st March 2017, 02:35   #3
hampers
Hampers

 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,653
Number 3 for me. No 1 is softer than 2 and 3 but prefer the eye/head in 3. It's looking straighter in the lens. Of course just a personal choice.

Phil
hampers is offline  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2009 2010 2011 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A Couple Photos to Critique EsotericForest Photo Critique 3 Sunday 10th July 2011 15:02
Critique please Atricapilla Photo Critique 5 Thursday 3rd June 2004 13:59

{googleads}

Fatbirder's Top 1000 Birding Websites

Help support BirdForum

Page generated in 0.14551806 seconds with 15 queries
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:30.