Join for FREE
It only takes a minute!
Magnifying the passion for nature. Zeiss Victory Harpia 95. New!

Welcome to BirdForum.
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community, dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE! You are most welcome to register for an account, which allows you to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 20 votes, 4.80 average.
Old Sunday 9th November 2008, 20:05   #1
Swissboy
Registered User
 
Swissboy's Avatar

 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sempach, Switzerland
Posts: 3,389
HMW Handbook of the Mammals of the World

Lynx Editions, the publishers of HBW, now have more info on their new project, the comparable Handbook of the Mammals of the World.

http://www.hbw.com/lynx/en/handbook-...rld/index.html

Volume 1, treating the carnivores, is scheduled for next April. Very exciting news, indeed, for whoever sees the need for a similar compendium on the mammals like we have come to appreciate for the birds.

Their pre-publication reduction is valid till the end of March. But I presume they stick to their policy of first ordered - first served.

What strikes me is that the number of planned volumes (8) is no longer showing on the Lynx website. Could it mean that the publishers realized an increase in volumes would be inevitable? Same thing happened with HBW, though not at the onset.
__________________
Robert
--PS: That's a Sooty Falcon on the avatar, photo taken near Sharm el Sheik, Egypt. My highest priority raptor at the time.
What's your species on the avatar? I often have no clue
!
Swissboy is offline  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Old Saturday 15th November 2008, 12:58   #2
Rasmus Boegh
BF member
 
Rasmus Boegh's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: right next door
Posts: 3,812
Excellent idea. I do hope they'll be able to keep the high standard of the bird version (and specifically related to the sample plates they have included on their page, for completeness I do hope they'll remember that some Black Bear are brown - would of course be nice to also include the white morph of kermodei or the greyish emmonsii, but I'm less bothered about that).

Last edited by Rasmus Boegh : Saturday 15th November 2008 at 13:04.
Rasmus Boegh is offline  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2008 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Old Saturday 15th November 2008, 21:27   #3
jurek
Registered User
 
jurek's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Switzerland/Poland
Posts: 3,739
...and that syrian brown bears are pale, and that quinlingensis giant pandas are brown and white.

I think idea is good, but samples of the text included seem rather too general and vague for so well studied creatures. Also photos are either tame animals or often-reproduced images (would be great to see some recent wild snow leopard pics instead of tame cub on the backdrop of Rocky Mountains). Would be interesting to see the finished book.
jurek is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Sunday 16th November 2008, 09:55   #4
Rasmus Boegh
BF member
 
Rasmus Boegh's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: right next door
Posts: 3,812
Quote:
Originally Posted by jurek View Post
...and that syrian brown bears are pale, and that quinlingensis giant pandas are brown and white.
Syrian Browns are rather similar in colour - a bit browner perhaps - to the illustrated Grizzly (which, of course, is pretty variable itself). Additionally, the single photo I've seen of a qinlingensis Giant Panda shows a far less impressive variation than what was suggested in the description of this subspecies. If the photo is accurate (I'll see if I can remember where I saw it), I'd say "slightly brown-tinged" is more accurate than brown for the dark parts, and the pale sections looked essentially as any other Giant Panda looks when dirty. Anyhow, we'll see the final result of this book.

EDIT: Found the photos. An immature, but in terms of colours it should be pretty similar to the ad's: http://www.lastrefuge.co.uk/images/h...ml/panda1.html

Last edited by Rasmus Boegh : Sunday 16th November 2008 at 10:18. Reason: edit
Rasmus Boegh is offline  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2008 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Old Monday 17th November 2008, 00:27   #5
jurek
Registered User
 
jurek's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Switzerland/Poland
Posts: 3,739
Not sure about pandas. Syrian brown bears are pale milk-coffee coloured, at least ones I seen in European zoos.
jurek is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 24th November 2008, 06:06   #6
Melanie
Registered User

 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kassel, Germany
Posts: 2,334
I am most curious on volume 3 about the primates. Because for the first time we will have accounts and illustrations of all newly described primates and lemurs since 1990 in one book, in particular those which were discovered by Marc van Roosmalen and Russ Mittermeier.

Last edited by Melanie : Monday 24th November 2008 at 15:59.
Melanie is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 24th November 2008, 14:29   #7
Isurus
Registered User
 
Isurus's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Guernsey
Posts: 2,077
Has Marc's stuff all been formally published and recognised? Quite a lot of it seems to just be on his website at the moment unless I'm missing publications?
Isurus is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 24th November 2008, 15:53   #8
Melanie
Registered User

 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kassel, Germany
Posts: 2,334
Well, there are some publications like this interesting paper: http://marcvanroosmalen.org/images/T...ti_Monkeys.pdf. There are also accounts in Wilson/Reeder: Mammal Species of the World and in a German book called Vergleichende Primatologie (Comparative Primatology) by Thomas Geissmann. But i think the HMW will be the most comprehensive account.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Isurus View Post
Has Marc's stuff all been formally published and recognised? Quite a lot of it seems to just be on his website at the moment unless I'm missing publications?
Melanie is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Monday 24th November 2008, 19:12   #9
Rasmus Boegh
BF member
 
Rasmus Boegh's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: right next door
Posts: 3,812
Quote:
Originally Posted by Isurus View Post
Has Marc's stuff all been formally published and recognised? Quite a lot of it seems to just be on his website at the moment unless I'm missing publications?
His earlier stuff has generally gained wider recognition and was, with a few exceptions, published in peer-reviewed journals, but there are on-going discussions regarding the taxonomy of numerous primate groups, in particular because several authorties (incl. Marc) in recent years have lobbied strongly for the phylogenetic species concept; i.e. there can be no doubts that many of the recently described "species" are species per PSC, but likewise there can be no doubts that many of them "only" are subspecies per the biological species concept (and you'll also notice that while numerous new species of primates have been described in recent years, virtually no subspecies have been described in the same period). As for the numerous "new species" Marc has mentioned/published info about in the last 2-3 years, they've been met with a far higher level of scepticism from fellow biologists than his earlier work. E.g. when he published rather brief comments about an orange coati I remember reading numerous comments around the internet speaking almost ecstatically about this potentially stunning animal... what they presumably didn't know is that there already are recognized subspecies of the South American Coati in parts of the Pantanal and south-central and south-eastern Amazon that are quite rich orange (see e.g. this: http://www.ddbstock.com/jpegndx/jung...lefauna064.jpg; in the border regions between the "normally coloured" ssp's and the orange ssp's the two intergrade and both colours can even be found among the members of the same group: http://flickr.com/photos/nor/56838165/sizes/o/), and thereby look completely different from the duller "standard" subspecies people are familiar with from zoos and alike (nevertheless, there is a possible new species of Nasuella coati in Peru - it is sometimes even seen near Machu Picchu - but that's another discussion). The subspecies with the "standard" colour are found in the northern, eastern and southern part of this species' range - as indeed could be expected from the drier habitat (standard Gloger's Rule). This geographical variation was even described more than a decade ago by L. H. Emmons in her book Neotropical Rainforest Mammals (which also correctly describes how the west Amazonain ssp's of the South American Coatis are much darker - indeed they look as different from the "normal ssp's" as the orange; http://flickr.com/photos/williamquat...01861/sizes/l/). Enough coati for one post! Anyhow, the case for several of his other recent claims of "new species" are equally questionable, even if there quite probably are a few "good ones" among them.

Last edited by Rasmus Boegh : Monday 24th November 2008 at 20:08. Reason: + photo link
Rasmus Boegh is offline  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2008 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Old Wednesday 13th May 2009, 21:28   #10
Swissboy
Registered User
 
Swissboy's Avatar

 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sempach, Switzerland
Posts: 3,389
Any news on this book? It is supposed to be published this month.
__________________
Robert
--PS: That's a Sooty Falcon on the avatar, photo taken near Sharm el Sheik, Egypt. My highest priority raptor at the time.
What's your species on the avatar? I often have no clue
!
Swissboy is offline  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Old Wednesday 13th May 2009, 21:45   #11
Daniel Philippe
Registered User
 
Daniel Philippe's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: France
Posts: 943
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swissboy View Post
Any news on this book? It is supposed to be published this month.
I received this mail today:

Dear Customer ,

We are pleased to inform you that your copy of the Handbook of the Mammals of the World volume 1 has been sent to you on Tuesday 12th of May. It will be delivered directly to the address you specified within about 9 working days. Please contact us if you do not receive the volume, or notification from the transport company, within this period.

Regards,

Lynx Edicions
Daniel Philippe is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 14th May 2009, 09:09   #12
Daniel Philippe
Registered User
 
Daniel Philippe's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: France
Posts: 943
Just arrived
Daniel Philippe is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 14th May 2009, 18:00   #13
jurek
Registered User
 
jurek's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Switzerland/Poland
Posts: 3,739
Any reviews? I may buy it, even at the double price.
jurek is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Thursday 14th May 2009, 20:23   #14
Swissboy
Registered User
 
Swissboy's Avatar

 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sempach, Switzerland
Posts: 3,389
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Philippe View Post
Just arrived
Great, so I can expect my copy within the next days, I guess. At any rate, it's good to know the book has actually come out. I'm curious too, to compare it with HBW's standard.
__________________
Robert
--PS: That's a Sooty Falcon on the avatar, photo taken near Sharm el Sheik, Egypt. My highest priority raptor at the time.
What's your species on the avatar? I often have no clue
!
Swissboy is offline  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Old Friday 15th May 2009, 12:58   #15
Daniel Philippe
Registered User
 
Daniel Philippe's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: France
Posts: 943
Quote:
Originally Posted by jurek View Post
Any reviews?
Can't review more than the cover today, but a glimpse inside revealed a layout very similar to HBW, superb photos and outstanding illustrations.

Daniel Philippe is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 15th May 2009, 13:22   #16
Melanie
Registered User

 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kassel, Germany
Posts: 2,334
What is the HMW saying about the population status of the Malabar Civet? It is really extinct?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Philippe View Post
Can't review more than the cover today, but a glimpse inside revealed a layout very similar to HBW, superb photos and outstanding illustrations.

Melanie is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 15th May 2009, 14:01   #17
Daniel Philippe
Registered User
 
Daniel Philippe's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: France
Posts: 943
Quote:
Originally Posted by Melanie View Post
What is the HMW saying about the population status of the Malabar Civet? It is really extinct?
Status and Conservation. Classified as Critically Endangered on The IUCN Red List. Schedule I of the Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act. The Malabar Civet is extremely rare and is listed as a priority species for conservation by the IUCN/SSC Small Carnivore Specialist Group. It has been recorded mostly in the coastal district, from Kanyakumari in the south to Honnavar in the north. There are only two reports of its occurrence at higher elevations, in the High Wavy Mountains and Kudremukh. In 1972, the IUCN declared that the Malabar Civet was possibly extinct . However, in the 1970s there were two possible sight records of this species, one in the Kudremukh area, Karnataka, and the other in Tiruvella, Kerala. Skins of recently killed civets were obtained in Elayur, Kerala (in 1987), and near Nilambur, northern Kerala (in 1990). Loss and degradation of habitat is a serious threat ; it is likely that surviving populations exist in the remaining lowland forests and sub-optimal habitats along the foothills and lower slopes of the Western Ghats. Another major threat is hunting for meat. Various conservation measures have been proposed : greater protection of remaining populations and habitats, captive breeding, field surveys, and ecological studies.
Daniel Philippe is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 15th May 2009, 14:35   #18
Melanie
Registered User

 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kassel, Germany
Posts: 2,334
Oh, thank you very much for this information. So there is some hope that this species might have survived. I think I will got my HMW copy in the early summer.
Melanie is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Saturday 30th May 2009, 23:55   #19
Rasmus Boegh
BF member
 
Rasmus Boegh's Avatar

 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: right next door
Posts: 3,812
A fast review of HMW vol. 1: First, do keep in mind that while I do have a “fair level” of knowledge about mammals, I am certainly not an expert and could therefore easily have missed something (not to forget that this is based on first impressions rather than a thorought check through every single part of the book).

I’ll start with what IMO is the primary weakness in an otherwise excellent work: Subspecies. In most species, there are no descriptions of subspecies (how they differ from each other - they do include the usual lists of the subspecies+their distribution in the intro of each species). I am well aware that mammalian taxonomy overall is far behind that of birds (far fewer people working with mammalian taxonomy & often far fewer specimens available, making it harder to accurately judge geographical variations), but even in species where the basis for recognizing the subspecies is relatively well known, it is often not mentioned in text. The same is the case in species where geographical variations in e.g. colour are relatively well known, even if they do not necessarily match currently recognized subspecies well. For example, while it is mentioned that the color of the South American Coati is very variable, ranging from very dark brown to orange, none of the geographical patterns in this variation – as I described in the earlier post #9 – are mentioned. The same is the case with many other species. Related to this, they generally do not mention IUCN Red List status for subspecies (only for species), e.g. no mention of the fact that the Asiatic Lion (Panthera leo persica) is rated as Endangered, or that the Iriomote Cat (Prionailurus bengalensis iriomotensis) is rated as Critically Endangered. Secondly, in many cases they have an IMO odd approach to species where a new review of the subspecific taxonomy is needed: They disregard all “traditionally” recognized subspecies and consider the species monotypic, as can be seen in e.g. the Stone Marten, Common Slender Mongoose, Eurasian Otter, Common Palm Civet and Binturong (in the last they somewhat oddly include illustrations of two subspecies and mention them in the taxonomy section, but don’t have any subspecies in the list). True, in these and several others the “traditional” subspecific boundaries are likely not entirely correct, but taxonomic work – as is the case with all scientific work – builds on top of previous knowledge (it is not a start from zero, as suggested by removing all “traditional” subspecies). As can be seen in both birds and mammals where there have been recent reviews of the subspecies, there really are few cases where earlier generations of taxonomists didn’t get it at least partially right... partially right is better than nothing. In other cases they evidently are aware of new work, but for some reasons chose not to follow it. For example, the recently described quinlingensis subspecies of the Giant Panda (also mentioned in some of the first posts of this thread) is not recognized, even if the taxonomic intro for the Giant Panda says: “No subspecies yet recognized, although one population in Quingling Mountains, Shaanxi Province, shows differences in cranial and dental morphology, pelage characteristics, and genetics indications of isolation for several thousand years, and a subspecies designation (quinlingensis) has been proposed.” With all that, and no arguments presented for why it should not be recognized, I find it puzzling why they still do not recognize it. Likewise, several studies (as they also mention) have shown that the various African subspecies of the Leopard should be considered synonymous. They do not mention any reasons for disregarding these studies, but still end up listing the several “traditional” African subspecies. Nevertheless, they evidently are fully aware of even very recent taxonomic publications/ideas, as there are few cases where they do not mention them somewhere (either in the systematic section of the family or under the taxonomic section of the individual species). E.g. they mention the very recent idea of splitting the Hog Badger into three species (even if they end up contradicting themselves in that species' entry versus plate) and – finally – a much needed review of the olingos has dealt with the previous complete taxonomic mess of that genus, though it means that they are forced to list one of the species as “Bassaricyon n. sp”, as they managed to beat the publication of the official species description. It should be noted that they (with very few exceptions, e.g. the Chinese Mountain Cat, where I have been unable to find any mention of the genetic work that suggests it should be considered a subspecies of F. silvestris [catus]) use what I would consider up-to-date species and generic limits, i.e. the previous mentioned issues are generally restricted to the lower level of subspecies.

The photos are, as we are used to from the bird equivalent HBW, plentiful and generally excellent: Like a Sand Cat having a go at a small viper and a Lion dealing with a young African Elephant (yes I know some might consider that last photo gruesome, but to disregard something like this in a book about Carnivores would IMO have been highly questionable and diminished the books value), a Margay showing its capability of climbing head-first down a tree trunk, encounters between a group of Banded Mongooses and a group of Common Dwarf Mongooses, a resting Banded Mongoose lying flat on its belly with all four limbs pointing outwards leading to an almost cartoonish look, a series of photos showing a “mouse leap” through snow by an Arctic Fox, a Gray Wolf – Brown Bear encounter, Giant Otter – Spectacled Caiman encounter, a Wolverine that looks seriously mad and as a direct opposite a playing young Wolverine rolling around on its back with its leg in the air and the tongue hanging out, not to forget photos of relatively poorly known rarities like the Andean Cat, Hose’s Palm Civet, Golden Palm Civet, Liberian Mongoose, Darwin’s Fox, Mountain Coati, Pygmy Spotted Skunk, etc. I do wonder if the identification of the "Tibetan Fox" on page 402 is correct, but perhaps I'm simply being fooled by the appearance of young individuals of this species (I've mentioned issues with certain identification in the bird equivalent HBW elsewhere; http://www.birdforum.net/showthread.php?t=125169).

The plates, too, are generally excellent and IMO belong among the best I have seen for mammals (something I admittedly feared a bit before receiving the book, considering the "mixed" quality of mammal illustrations in many field guides). There really are very few where I have some issues, and where I do they are in general minor. The fact remains; they are generally among the best mammal illustrations I have seen. It also appears they added quite a few illustrations in the last period of the production, as some may have noticed from the change in the sample plates available on the Lynx Edicions homepage. For example, they now have both the brown and white Black Bears (see post #2) and Syrian Brown Bears (post #3; there are now illustrations of 6 subspecies of the Brown Bear). In general, the coverage of subspecies/variants/morphs on the plates is excellent, and there are few cases where I think an extra illustration would have added any significant to the value of this work. Furthermore, unlike the bird equivalent HBW, HMW includes illustrations of animals in the winter pelage when it differs significantly from summer, and in a small number of cases (several of the large cats) they even included illustrations of juveniles.

I have very little to add on the main text (family & species), and the sections I have checked generally appear both thorough and up-to-date. In addition to all the “usual” stuff, I was quite pleased to see that they included dental formulas in many species, which are quite important in several mammalian groups. I have not spend any greater amount of time checking the first chapter, which is an overall introduction to mammals (skeleton, respiratory system, metabolism, various types of locomotion, lactation, behaviors, etc), but it appeared to be a good, although brief, introduction to the various matters.

So, overall this appears to be the start of yet another excellent series, but with room for improvements on the issues mentioned in the first section of this review. On a 10-point scale (0= worst; 10 = perfect) with the last few volumes of the bird equivalent HBW rating at 8 or 9, HMW vol. 1 would be 7 or 8. Recommended for anyone with a more serious interest in mammals than just the usual "big and famous" species.

Last edited by Rasmus Boegh : Sunday 31st May 2009 at 11:30. Reason: typo
Rasmus Boegh is offline  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2008 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Old Sunday 31st May 2009, 14:50   #20
jurek
Registered User
 
jurek's Avatar

 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Switzerland/Poland
Posts: 3,739
Like Rasmus, I noticed changed plates (including eg. Syrian Brown Bear and colour forms of American Black Bear). I wonder if publishers might have responded to the last-minute critique? It would be very nice.

Overall, it is very good, especially as it is the first book to describe and reasonably portrait many less known small carnivores. Although I still cannot tell whether otters I saw in India were Eurasian or Smooth-coated Otters. !

Criticism? For me a bit too superficial, although of course many big carnivores are extremely well researched. I would enjoy more info on the past and prehistoric (eg. falkland wolf; no mention of so-called cave hyena or sabetoothed cats). In mammals we know that there is a fact a continuum from the prehistoric extinctions to the modern ones. Some species texts, in contrast, seem to be too much details and no overview of eg. food habits. Often the autors seem unable to describe when the knowledge is poor and unsafe (eg. like Rasmus said, many subspecies with a need of taxonomic revision).

Some pictures are painfully captive animals (sea otter and binturong with aquarium walls and mesh visible). Overall, a book is very attractive, but many pics seem too cropped, like the subject is 'exploding' the page.

Still, the best work on carnivores available, and much needed replacement of the old Walker's.
jurek is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Friday 12th June 2009, 23:08   #21
Swissboy
Registered User
 
Swissboy's Avatar

 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sempach, Switzerland
Posts: 3,389
Thank you, Rasmus, for your nevertheless quite thorough assessment! I have since received my copy as well, but I can't judge on the accuracy. Thus, your review is most helpful in that respect as well.

Inevitably, this new series is being compared with the bird series (HBW). While the basic set-up is pretty much similar, there have been some changes in the appearance. On the positive side, each photo clearly states the scientific name now in bold face. On the negative side, these captions to the photos now come in a smaller font than in HBW. This makes for harder reading for all whose eyesight is no longer (or never has been) optimal.

On first sight, the outside cover of any book is its first "calling card", so to speak. Here, I think, the new series has not received what it deserves. HBW comes in a somewhat unconventional and bold design, clearly indicating its extraordinary status. HMW, however, comes across as "just another" encyclopedia. I have several large animal books that all have a basically black cover (or at least spine) with white lettering. Thus, the new series does not stand out optically at all. A minor thing, maybe, but it might also be interpreted as "not being that extraordinary". Certainly not what the series deserves.
__________________
Robert
--PS: That's a Sooty Falcon on the avatar, photo taken near Sharm el Sheik, Egypt. My highest priority raptor at the time.
What's your species on the avatar? I often have no clue
!
Swissboy is offline  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Old Monday 22nd June 2009, 22:37   #22
Swissboy
Registered User
 
Swissboy's Avatar

 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sempach, Switzerland
Posts: 3,389
Meanwhile, I have been puzzled by the range maps. These show only the original or presumed native distribution. Thus, any range extensions due to human releases, such as the Red Fox in Australia are not shown. They are just briefly mentioned in the text. But they give no details about the extension in the area. I think this is a major flaw in an otherwise very informative book. I'd suggest showing the total range, but the parts that are due to releases could be shown with another color or with another signature such as lighter, dotted, striped.

The same omission, by the way, is also found in the HBW series. It may be that there is often too much uncertainty as to whether an introduced species will be there for good. But those cases of widespread occurrence like European Starlings in North America would definitely deserve being shown as well.
__________________
Robert
--PS: That's a Sooty Falcon on the avatar, photo taken near Sharm el Sheik, Egypt. My highest priority raptor at the time.
What's your species on the avatar? I often have no clue
!

Last edited by Swissboy : Monday 22nd June 2009 at 22:48.
Swissboy is offline  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Old Tuesday 23rd June 2009, 10:46   #23
Richard Klim
-------------------------
 
Richard Klim's Avatar

 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Somerset, UK
Posts: 12,792
Introduced ranges

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swissboy View Post
I'd suggest showing the total range, but the parts that are due to releases could be shown with another color or with another signature such as lighter, dotted, striped.

The same omission, by the way, is also found in the HBW series. It may be that there is often too much uncertainty as to whether an introduced species will be there for good. But those cases of widespread occurrence like European Starlings in North America would definitely deserve being shown as well.
I agree it would be useful to distinguish between natural and introduced ranges on distribution maps.

The mapping of introduced species seems quite variable in HBW. eg, in Britain, Canada Goose, Ring-necked Pheasant & Little Owl are mapped, but Red-legged Partridge is not; in N America, Mute Swan, Ring-necked Pheasant & Rock Dove are mapped, but Chukar & Grey Partridge are not. I guess a judgement has been made on which are the most significant and sustainable introductions. Of course, some introductions have expanded their ranges so rapidly that any distribution maps would already be obsolete (eg, Eurasian Collared Dove in N America).

In general, I think that all species with widespread introduced ranges should preferably be fully mapped. But I don't beliveve it would be useful to attempt to illustrate the distributions of introduced species largely confined to urban areas (derived from cagebirds - mostly passerines & parrots), or small isolated populations derived from exotic pheasants & wildfowl - the description of such localised populations is perhaps better confined to the text.

Richard

PS: I'm looking forward to seeing HMW1 at the Birdfair in August.
Richard Klim is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Tuesday 23rd June 2009, 21:12   #24
Swissboy
Registered User
 
Swissboy's Avatar

 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sempach, Switzerland
Posts: 3,389
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Klim View Post
........
In general, I think that all species with widespread introduced ranges should preferably be fully mapped. But I don't beliveve it would be useful to attempt to illustrate the distributions of introduced species largely confined to urban areas (derived from cagebirds - mostly passerines & parrots), or small isolated populations derived from exotic pheasants & wildfowl - the description of such localised populations is perhaps better confined to the text.

.......

I fully agree with you. In particular, it would not be feasible to map very localised populations in the available space. And I think this should hold both for HBW and HMW.
__________________
Robert
--PS: That's a Sooty Falcon on the avatar, photo taken near Sharm el Sheik, Egypt. My highest priority raptor at the time.
What's your species on the avatar? I often have no clue
!

Last edited by Swissboy : Tuesday 23rd June 2009 at 21:14.
Swissboy is offline  
Reply With Quote

BF Supporter 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Support BirdForum With A Donation

Old Wednesday 24th June 2009, 00:16   #25
Melanie
Registered User

 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Kassel, Germany
Posts: 2,334
I think the range maps in HMW 1 are rather similar to the range maps in the IUCN red list.
Melanie is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisement
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Handbook of the birds of the world volume 11 Papuan birder Books, Magazines, Publications, Video & DVD 11 Tuesday 15th September 2015 12:35
Handbook of the Birds of the World stuartelsom Books, Magazines, Publications, Video & DVD 0 Thursday 26th January 2006 19:56

{googleads}

Fatbirder's Top 1000 Birding Websites

Help support BirdForum

Page generated in 0.21662402 seconds with 36 queries
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:14.