Steve said: Brock speaking of thousandth of acrseconds Rick already posts on Cloudy Nights/Days.
Yes, I know, Rick is on my CN Friends List. We have PMed each other.
I was just busting his chopsticks. He's a great guy.
(Plus, I don't want to lose my "Tokyo connection" when all the world except Japan runs out of Nikon classic porros!
Bob, you're going to get a "schoolmarmish knuckle rapping" for that kind of culinary tomfoolery (thanks for that phrase, Henry, it is
so true!).
I agree that this thread has been exhausted. I know I'm exhausted!
Henry, I respect you enormously even though when you go too "quant" for me to follow your intricate calculations, you do so with grace and patience in trying to explain it "long hand" to us mathophobes, so I will take your sagely advice to strike a "happy medium" on BF threads (but
not in my Gumbo, which I don't like Medium but "HOT"!
.
However, I don't think my post here was "wildly irrelevant" but rather evolutionary, and I've had PMs from others who agreed.
I think our difference of opinion on this stems my "stream of consciousness" way of thinking (I think that was what Rick was trying to say above), which is a vastly different approach than a quant's methodical step-by-step analysis.
However, if there are no objections and all that needed to be said about the silver vs. dielectric coatings OP has been said, I will end it, and we can continue the "incremental changes" discussion on the other thread I posted.
<THE END>