I have to agree that it is sad about their not being introduced in Europe. Maybe the rumors of there being a conventional bridge model with the same optics introduced in your neck of the woods are true.
One can only hope.
...as for availability... I have seen them locally here in the US and online at severl retailers.
I have not tried an EDG bin yet, however, from looking at every review I could find, and matching the specs, the optics
do appear to be the same as the HGL except for the added ED element.
Given the HGL's excessive CA (more CA than the HG to my eyes), the ED element was a much needed "fix," and adding the open bridged roof design made the EDG competitive with the Swaro EL.
What I suspect happened was this (purely conjecture):
Due to problems with the toulouse popping diopters, Nikon delayed the release of its EDG series, and by the time the final version came out, we were at the beginning of a world wide recession.
So after people's 401ks became 201ks, not many had extra $ in discretionary funds to buy $2k bins or if they did, they decided to hold off because of the still growing unemployment numbers and uncertainty about when the economy will recover.
Meanwhile, the Chinese came out with their ED open bridged clones around the same time as the EDG, and they are selling like hotcakes, because of their surprisingly good quality and much lower price at a time when consumers are looking for value.
Economics may have also played a part in why Nikon decided to re-release the less expensive HG L as the "Premier LX" and why they are holding off releasing the EDG in Europe.
The Premier HG (HG L) provides an alternative to those who want a high end roof but who can't afford to spend $2k on an EDG.
It also provides consumers who have deep pockets but don't like the open roof design with a closed bridge alternative from Nikon.
If Nikon had a crystal ball and could have seen the Wall Street meltdown coming, it might have just added an ED element to the HG L and upped the price $300 like Pentax did on its EDs.
What they need to do to sell some EDGs, but they can't do what Zeiss did with Eagle Optics. Leave out the box, and then charge $600 less! Hope you took advantage of that sale if you wanted an FL. (wonder where all those boxes went?
.
However, Zeiss could do that because the FL has been out for some time, and they have already recovered their R & D.
I'm sure we will see the EDG in Europe after the recovery. Employers are likely to reduce wages to offset loses during the recession (mine did), so that might slow consumer spending on high ticket items like the EDG for some time.
I had my Nikon 8x32 LX up for sale, but couldn't get my price (which was less than what I've seen others sell for on the same online Website, but that's what happens during recessions - people want bargains).
So I'm holding on to my LX for now. I have large hands and would probably find the 8x32 EDG more comfortable to hold, and the LX has more CA than my porros, so the ED element would be a welcomed addition, but I'm not going to pay over a $1,000 more for those two improvements.
After the recovery is solid and my pockets are hopefully jingling again, I might consider buying a "pre-owned" or "refurbished" 8x32 EDG at a good price if it's better optically and ergonomically than my 8x32 LX.
Newer isn't always better, as I found out with the HG L.
However, if the EDG turns out to be the "bee's knees" (threw that in for the Brits
, then I will expect the EDG to last me a lifetime.
Other than add FL glass there is not much else they could do to the EDG (other than add some pincushion to the full sized models!!!).
I think we are reaching (or perhaps have already reached) the limit of optical quality in roof prism binoculars.
From here on in, it will be a matter of personal preference for the optical and ergonomic design choices and amenities of one premium bin vs. another, and "brand loyalty" that will dictate sales.
I also see "made in China" losing its stigma in the future to the point of being equal to "made in Japan" in terms of optical quality.
"Zeiss" and "Leica" and to a lesser extent "Swarovski" will continue to carry their prestige, but with very good Chinese and Japanese alternatives, and continued economic pressures on the US and Europe even after the recovery due to the emergence of China and India as major economic powers, I see worldwide sales slumping for the "Big Three".
My crystal ball is getting hazy so I will now stop.
Brock