• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

New Leica Scopes (1 Viewer)

My brother was talking to a UK supplier earlier today about the 82mm model. It made for some pretty depressing news for anyone hankering after one of these. Key takeaways:

1) Leica are being bullish about the retail price. Credit crunch or no credit crunch, the basic price isn't likely to come down anytime soon as a concession to the current economic climate, so don't expect anything more than a 'free' stay on case (and how much of a concession is that really? It must cost a lot less to manufacture, market and cover the retailer's margin than the £150 they charge)

2) The units won't be available until next month at the earliest and, even then, it sounds like supply will be drip-fed with some existing firm orders possibly not being met until February 09

3) As a result, the older 77mm Televids are still commanding good prices second-hand (I've watched a few on ebay and they are mostly going for £700+) as many presumably settle for a Leica they can afford

As a marketing professional myself I don't know whether to pity or grudgingly admire how Leica have handled the launch of these new models. The lack of communication about the ongoing delays is certainly frustrating but only adds to the anticipation I guess. They clearly believe in not rushing the product to market before they feel it's ready and they also have absolute faith in the value of what they have produced. A considerable amount of R&D will have gone into this kit and, as mentioned elsewhere on this thread, the fact that they will inevitably sell fewer of these very top-end scopes than say a mid-range model will have been factored into their business plan and hence their retail price point.

I was fortunate enough to get a good 20 minutes-or-so use out of one of the APO 82mm models Leica had on their stand at this year's Birdfair and I have to say it was a pleasure to use. I personally found the wide angle lens amazing and, as a spectacles-wearer, the 'comfort' of the view seemed superior to all the other makes and models I tried that day: when comparing views at the same magnification it felt like I was looking down a smarties tube in comparison.

That said, like many others here I'm really not sure I can justify £2,500 on a piece of kit that will inevitably get knocked about in the field no matter how careful I am. I genuinely think I'd be too petrified to take it out of the house, rather defeating the object!

I really wish Leica well as I respect their products and their brand values but I have my doubts as to whether I'll see many of these models in the field.

David
 
I have been following this thread with interest.

It wasn’t so long ago that a big scope was essential as a main scope, simply because the optical quality most people needed most of the time was not available on a smaller scope.

Then Stephen Ingraham asked what the point of an 80mm scope was for most people most of the time after reviewing the Swarovski and Zeiss 65s on BVD. More recently the Nikon ED50 threads on this forum have not only been asking the same question, but some are on record as having bought an ED50 and then sold their big scopes because they didn’t use them any more. I have a Swarovski 80HD and I’m fed up with lugging it around. I’ve looked through an ED50 and I’ll be buying one this week.

Whilst some will always have a need for a big scope (e.g. sea watching, high end digiscoping etc.), and others always have the money for the latest and most expensive scope, I wonder if the days when your main scope had to be a big scope are over for most people most of the time. If so perhaps fewer people than before will see the need to spend £2500 on a main scope. Perhaps the new Leica may then turn out to be an expensive luxury for specialist use and/or a second scope for the few that can afford it.

Interesting times !
 
I've just "downsized" from an 80 to a Swaro 65HD - don't think I'm going to notice much difference apart from weight.

Seeing the incredible price of the new Leicas I was a little surprised to see a APO 62 Angled ("old" model) on sale in Cardiff (not second hand) for £589, the non-APO was £489; the lenses (no zoom unfortunately) were all below £160 - a good buy for someone.

They also had a Swaro 65HD body for £549, no lenses I'm afraid.

New models appear and we benefit!
 
How much will it cost to insure a £2,500 scope? As David said it will pick up a few knocks and if you take a scope up hill and down dale as I do, then insurance is needed.
Gareth

p.s I dont work in insurance!
 
How much will it cost to insure a £2,500 scope? As David said it will pick up a few knocks and if you take a scope up hill and down dale as I do, then insurance is needed.
Gareth

p.s I dont work in insurance!

Not sure exactly, but I pay around £20-25 per year to insure my Swaro 80HD as a specified single item over £1000 on my home contents. Some policies allow single items up to around £1500 for no extra cost, but a £2500 scope would surely be over this limit. Although it's worth bearing in mind that the body only should be less this,

Steve
 
My house hold policy allows single items up to £2000 for no extra cost.
That said, I would set foot out of the house with ANY 'scope unless it was in a suitable (padded) case e.g. skua
 
It wasn’t so long ago that a big scope was essential as a main scope, simply because the optical quality most people needed most of the time was not available on a smaller scope.
Then Stephen Ingraham asked what the point of an 80mm scope was for most people most of the time after reviewing the Swarovski and Zeiss 65s on BVD.

Yesterday I was observing a grey phalarope at a distance of approx 1200 metres through my Swaro 65 HD with a fixed x 30 wide. The light conditions were fair - slightly overcast at around 1330 hours.I asked to look through someone elses Leica APO 77 with a x 32 wide. The image through the Leica was noticably brighter than through my 65mm. This is surely the point why companies produce 80mm and larger objective scopes and why some people will have them. A 65mm top end scope is a handy compromise for most people in terms of size, weight and cost. The larger stablemate should always give you a brighter image. I would happily have a Leica 82 if I could afford one. Regards
 
What is going on with the release date of these scopes? Month after month goes by and every time I look at retailers' advertising or websites I see the 'available from' date has been pushed back yet again.

When I first became aware of them, release was scheduled for April 08. Today I noticed a retailer's advert indicating availability from Nov/Dec!

Is Leica just trying to ride out the recession by retarding release until we're in a more favourable economic climate that makes the wallet-busting asking price of these seem marginally more realistic? Or are there production/finishing problems I wonder?

All rather academic in my case as I'm not sure I want to afford one, so to speak, but I'm curious to compare the 82 with the 85 diascope at a retailer that (eventually!) stocks both.
 
Some companies in the optics market seem to be very impressed by the success that Microsoft once had with introduction of their early version of Windows. The success was essentially based on very early advertisings of a product yet to come.

Steve
 
Last edited:
Some companies in the optics market seem to be very impressed by the success that Microsoft once had with introduction of their early version of Windows. The success was essentially based on very early advertisings of a product yet to come.

Steve

But how do you install update after update in a scope once the flaws have become obvious ? ;)
 
Yesterday I was observing a grey phalarope at a distance of approx 1200 metres through my Swaro 65 HD with a fixed x 30 wide. The light conditions were fair - slightly overcast at around 1330 hours.I asked to look through someone elses Leica APO 77 with a x 32 wide. The image through the Leica was noticably brighter than through my 65mm. This is surely the point why companies produce 80mm and larger objective scopes and why some people will have them. A 65mm top end scope is a handy compromise for most people in terms of size, weight and cost. The larger stablemate should always give you a brighter image. I would happily have a Leica 82 if I could afford one. Regards


I agree that the larger objectives to present a noticable advantage in certain conditions and if every other factor is equal it should be brighter. One note about the APO 77 is that it's exceptionally bright for its size. While on an elk hunt a year ago we were able to directly compare a non-HD STS80 on some distant herds ranging from 600-1600 yards. The difference in brightness was a bit surprising and a fair amount of more detail could be seen in the fading skylight through the Leica. During the last 6-8 minutes of light the STS80 wasn't usable anymore and was put away. The difference during the 90 minutes prior to that was imperceptible as there was plenty of light available for either scope. It was only during the last 25 minutes that the difference became discernible. I suspect that the HD model would have performed better but obviously Leica was utilizing some fairly impressive glass in the 77 APO. I don't personally believe the difference was due to the optical coatings since Swarovski often seems to be the best in that regard.
 
Last edited:
I was in the mini Cley Spy at Cley NWT yesterday and the very helpful chap there told me he did not think that they would have the new scopes in much before April! Come on Leica!
 
And it seems to have increased the price of their bins as well-from SWOptics their 10x42 is now £1599!!!

I think I ought to ring Leica up and ask them exactly why that is worth £600 more than a Zeiss FL!
 
And it seems to have increased the price of their bins as well-from SWOptics their 10x42 is now £1599!!!

I think I ought to ring Leica up and ask them exactly why that is worth £600 more than a Zeiss FL!

Leica had better smell the coffee or they're going to price themselves out of business, they'll still be those with more money than sense who won't mind the extra outlay but I'd imagine a good deal of their custom comes from everyday birders on the street who have to save for months to aquire such a product...I think those people will soon start to turn to the competition with these ridiculous price increases!!

Matt
 
Warning! This thread is more than 15 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top