Nikon 200-400 f4 vs 300 f2.8 (1 Viewer)

J

JSER

Well-known member

• Aug 20, 2011

• #21

Nice lens, my sixteen year old son has this on his camera.

28-300.

 

Last edited: Aug 20, 2011

steve.hinchliffe

Well-known member

• Aug 20, 2011

• #22

have had the 200/400 for 18 months now and yes it is a heavy lump of glass
but the i q is superb with or without the 1.4 converter .quality and versatility
in one package.attached is an image taken handheld with the 1.4 only this last
week

 

Attachments

• 
  foxy2.jpg

  175.6 KB · Views: 704

A

alasdairturner

Well-known member

• Aug 22, 2011

• #23

Thanks for all the thoughts. I was out for the weekend shooting these...

 

Attachments

• 
  DSC_5449vsmall.jpg

  307.4 KB · Views: 384

Jaff

Registered Member

• Aug 22, 2011

• #24

Was that taken with your 70-200mm? If you can get that close to birds do you even need another lens!?

 

A

alasdairturner

Well-known member

• Aug 22, 2011

• #25

Yea that was with the 70-200. I have no problem getting close to some ground birds and hawks and eagles, but there are other birds I would like to shoot that are not as cooperative.